Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Blank fields in records indicate information that was not collected or not collected electronically prior to July 2006.
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
3320-0008
ICR Reference No:
200203-3320-006
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
199905-2010-001
Agency/Subagency:
MKU-USIECR
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
National Roster for Environmental Dispute Resolution and Consensus-Building Professionals
Type of Information Collection:
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
03/11/2002
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
03/11/2002
Terms of Clearance:
As agreed upon after discussions with EPA, the ICR was approved for a three-year period with the following terms of clearance. Before the next review of the ICR, EPA shall perform an evaluation of the National Roster for Environmental Dispute Professionals. EPA shall consult with OIRA regarding the details of the evaluation design. The evaluation shall include, at a minimum, the following subjects. Roster Composition 1. Number of people on the roster, tabulated by organizational affiliation (non-profit, ADR firm, law firm, etc.) 2. Rate of failure of applicants to the roster. 3. Analysis of those who failed to qualify. The analysis should break down those failing to qualify by score into subgroups of 50-64 points, 0-49 points. The analysis should include applicants' organizational affiliation (non-profit, etc.) as well as score. Roster Use 1. Number of people calling the Institute for assistance with using the roster to develop a panel of mediators, subdivided by agency (EPA regions, EPA headquarters, other Federal agencies, state/local government agencies, other). 2. Number of people accessing the roster electronically to develop a panel of mediators, subdivided if possible by agency. 3. Estimate of the percentage of environmental disputes mediated by EPA that use a mediator who is on the roster. 4. Estimate of the percentage of environmental disputes mediated by other Federal agencies that use a mediator who is on the roster. 5. Estimate of the percentage of environmental disputes mediated by state/local agencies that use a mediator from the roster, if possible.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
10/31/2002
10/31/2002
Responses
167
0
0
Time Burden (Hours)
458
0
0
Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
Abstract:
This ICR is the application form for listing facilitators, mediators, and other similar professionals on a National Roster for Environmental Dispute Resolution and Consensus-Building Professionals ("roster"). It will collect information about the experience and education of professionals engaged in assisting disputants in reaching consensus, agreements, or settlements of environmental and natural resource conflicts. The information needed to complete the form is the same as that found on a resume or curriculum vita or provided in reply to a request for proposal.
Authorizing Statute(s):
None
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
1
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
National Roster for Environmental Dispute Resolution and Consensus-Building Professionals
1888.01
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
167
0
0
167
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
458
0
0
458
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$0
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [PPACA, P.L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Act [Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, P.L. 111-203]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
Uncollected
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
03/11/2002
About Us
Related Resources
Disclosure
Accessibility
Privacy Policy
Contact Us
