Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0938-0941
ICR Reference No:
200809-0938-015
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
200511-0938-002
Agency/Subagency:
HHS/CMS
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Medicare Demonstration Ambulatory Care Quality Measure Performance Assessment Tool ("PAT")
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved with change
Conclusion Date:
01/08/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
09/26/2008
Terms of Clearance:
This ICR is approved consistent with CMS memos of 11/10/08 and 12/30/08 and revised supporting statement. Accordingly, CMS 1) agrees to acknowledge all study limitations when discussing study results; 2) recognizes that the results of these demonstrations will not be generalizable to the general population or the Medicare provider/beneficiary population and that further study is needed before pay-for-performance programs are implemented on a wider scale and will therefore not generalize the results beyond the study sites as such; and 3) acknowledges that these demonstrations were not designed to evaluate changes in quality as a function of varying incentive amounts. Further, CMS acknowledges that pay-for-performance programs can lead to unintended consequences (e.g. cream-skimming, exacerbation of health disparities, coding creep, cost-shifting, impeded knowledge transfer among providers, etc.), particularly in the absence of rigorous risk-adjustment methodologies. While CMS intends to evaluate the degree to which these pay-for-performance demonstration programs may have resulted in any unintended consequences, CMS acknowledges that the design of these demonstration programs may not allow for a robust evaluation of these unintended consequences. For all these reasons, caution should be exercised--and further studies conducted--before rolling these programs out on a wider scale. Future rounds should address these limitations to the maximum extent possible. Finally, CMS shall discontinue 0938-0942 as those burdens are being rolled into this ICR. Previous terms of clearance remain in effect.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
01/31/2012
36 Months From Approved
01/31/2009
Responses
1,060
0
800
Time Burden (Hours)
25,990
0
19,200
Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
Abstract:
The Performance Assessment Tool ("PAT) is being used in 3 CMS pay for performance demonstrations to collect clinical quality measure information. It is not an electronic health record but rather a tool for collecting 'numerator' and 'denominator' information that is used to calculate performance measures on specific clinical quality measures. The tool is currently approved for use in the Physician Group Practice (PGP) Demonstration and the Medicare Care Management Performance Demonstration (MCMP). These are both Congressionally mandated demonstrations and will continue data collection past the current expiration date and through FY 2011. In 2008, CMS will implement the Electronic Health Records (EHR) demonstration, a high Secretarial and Administration priority, to encourage the adoption of electronic health records in small to medium sized primary care practices. This demonstration does not involve the development by CMS of an electronic health record, but will require physician offices to implement them over a specific period of time. This demonstration will include the collection of the same clinical quality measures using the same PAT data collection tool and methodology as the MCMP demonstration. The first year clinical data collection for this demonstration will begin in the fall of 2011, and, therefore, should be covered under this PRA approval.
Authorizing Statute(s):
US Code:
42 USC 1395b-1
Name of Law: EHR Demonstration
PL:
Pub.L. 108 - 173 649
Name of Law: MCMP Demonstration - Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
73 FR 36329
06/26/2008
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
73 FR 53026
09/12/2008
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
3
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Medicare Demonstration Ambulatory Care Quality Measure Performance Assessment Tool (PAT) - MCMP Demonstration
CMS-10136
MCMP PAT
Medicare Demonstration Ambulatory Care Quality Measure Performance Assessment Tool (PAT) - PGP Demonstration
CMS-10136
MCMP PAT
Medicare Demonstration Ambulatory Care Quality Measure Performance Assessment Tool (PAT) -EHR Demonstration
CMS-10136
MCMP PAT
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
1,060
800
0
400
-140
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
25,990
19,200
0
9,600
-2,810
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
We are combining two previously approved forms (for the PGP and MCMP Demonstration) into one submission as the data collection tools used for both are substantially the same. A revised estimate of the burden is provided. The difference in the total burden of effort is due to a combination of factors. On a per submission basis, the burden for the PGP demonstration is greater than the MCMP Demonstration due to the larger size of practices and the greater number of patients for whom data is collected per respondent. However, the number of respondents for the MCMP Demonstration has been reduced from a projected 800 (prior to recruitment of practices) to an actual of 650, thus contributing to a reduction in the burden estimate. Also, starting in 2011, we are adding a third demonstration, the EHR Demonstration. This demonstration, which is being conducted under CMS's statutory demonstration authority, has been approved by OMB and is a Administration and Secretarial priority. The goal of this demonstration is to encourage the adoption of electronic health records as a tool to improve the quality and efficiency of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries. As part of this effort, demonstration practices who volunteer to participate will use this data collection tool to submit the same clinical quality measures as the MCMP Demonstration. Finally, we have increased the hourly average cost (salary + fringe) to submit the data due to the general increase in salaries over time. More detail on the estimate of burden is provided in the Supporting Statement.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$906,202
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
Yes
Part B of Supporting Statement
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Bonnie Harkless 4107865666
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
09/26/2008