Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0648-0514
ICR Reference No:
200910-0648-004
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
200809-0648-002
Agency/Subagency:
DOC/NOAA
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Alaska Region BSAI Crab Permits
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
10/18/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
10/08/2009
Terms of Clearance:
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
07/31/2011
07/31/2011
07/31/2011
Responses
2,899
0
2,799
Time Burden (Hours)
4,450
0
4,419
Cost Burden (Dollars)
12,374
0
17,011
Abstract:
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) manages the crab fisheries in the waters off the coast of Alaska under the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab. The Crab Rationalization Program (Program) allocates Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands crab resources among harvesters, processors, and coastal communities. This collection-of-information addresses the permits, transfers, and cost recovery procedures for the Program. This request is to add the option of online transfers to the Program, for: 1) transfer of IFQ between cooperatives, 2) transfer of IFQ and 3) transfer of IPQ. In addition, the Application for Transfer of Crab Quota Share/Individual Fishing Quota (QS/IFQ) or Processor Quota Shares/Individual Processing Quota (PQS/IPQ) is removed and replaced by three separate applications, because each of the quota type transfers is submitted differently and contains different information.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 94 - 265 313(j)
Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as amended in 2006
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
0648-AW56
Final or interim final rulemaking
74 FR 51515
10/07/2009
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
17
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Annual application for crab IFQ permit
NA
Application for Crab IFQ/IPQ permit
Appeal of denial of any application
Application for Crab IFQ Hired Master Permit
NA
Application for Crab IFQ Hired Master Permit
Application for Crab IPQ permit
NA
Application for crab IFQ/IPQ permit
Application for Registered Crab Receiver (RCR) Permit
NA
Application for Registered Crab Receiver Permit
Application for Transfer of Crab IPQ
NA
Transfer of Crab IPQ
Application for an Annual Crab Harvesting Cooperative IFQ Permit
NA
Application for Crab Harvesting Cooperative IFQ Permit
Application for eligibility to receive crab QS/IFQ or PQS/IPQ by transfer
NA
Application to receive crab QS/IFQ or PQS/IPQ by transfer
Application for federal crab vessel permit
NA
Application for federal crab vessel permit
Application for transfer of IFQ
NA
Transfer of Crab IFQ
Application for transfer of IFQ between crab harvesting cooperatives
NA
Transfer of IFQ between crab harvesting cooperatives
Application for transfer of crab QS or PQS
NA
Transfer of crab QS or PQS
Application for transfer of crab QS/IFQ to or from an ECCO
NA
Application for transfer of crab QS/IFQ to or from an ECCO
Application to become an ECCO
NA
Application to become an ECCO
Registered Crab Receiver Fee Submission Form
NA
Registered Crab Receiver Fee Submission Form
Right of first refusal contracts
Right of first refusal waivers
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
2,899
2,799
0
100
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
4,450
4,419
0
31
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
12,374
17,011
0
-4,637
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Changing Regulations
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Reduction Due to:
Changing Regulations
Short Statement:
Program changes: 1) provide the option to submit quota transfers online for Crab IFQ, IPQ and inter-cooperative transfer of IFQ; 2) remove the Application for transfer of Crab QS/IFQ or PQS/IPQ and separate it into three applications, because each of the quota type transfers is submitted differently and contains different information; 3) remove the notarization requirement for transfers of Crab IFQ and Crab IPQ. There is an overall increase of 31 hours. A net increase of 180 hours is due to the removal of the transfer of Crab QS/IFQ or PQS/IPQ form and replacement by the three following it below, but the shorter average response time for transfer of Crab IPQ saves 16 hours; that is, simply adding these three forms, with no online transfer option for Crab IPQ transfer, would have added 196 hours. A decrease of 149 hours is due to the addition of online submission for the inter-cooperative transfer of IFQ. Removing the notarization requirement for Crab IFQ and IPQ decreases miscellaneous costs by $2,920. Allowing online transfer for the inter-cooperative transfer of IFQ decreases miscellaneous costs by $1,765. Adding $48 for the Crab QS/PQS transfer results in a net decrease of $4,637. Details of Program Changes: Application for Transfer of Crab QS/IFQ or PQS/IPQ; this form is removed. a decrease of 400 respondents and responses, 0 instead of 400 a decrease of 800 hr burden, 0 hr instead of 800 hr a decrease of $20,000 personnel costs, $0 instead of $20,000 a decrease of $4,572 miscellaneous costs, $0 instead of $4,572 Application for Transfer of Crab QS or PQS; this form is added. This form must be notarized and may be submitted only by mail or courier. an increase of 93 respondents and responses, 93 instead of 0 an increase of 186 hr burden, 186 hr instead of 0 hr an increase of $4,650 personnel costs, $4,650 instead of $0 an increase of $48 miscellaneous costs, $48 instead of $0 Application for Transfer of Crab IFQ; this form is added. This form may be submitted by mail, fax, or courier. an increase of 373 respondents and responses, 373 instead of 0 an increase of 746 hr burden, 746 hr instead of 0 hr an increase of $18,650 personnel costs, $18,650 instead of $0 an increase of $1,605 miscellaneous costs, $1,605 instead of $0 Application for Transfer of Crab IPQ; this form is added. This form may now be submitted online, as well as by fax, by mail, or by courier. an increase of 24 respondents, 24 instead of 0 an increase of 32 responses, 32 instead of 0 an increase of 48 hr burden, 48 hr instead of 0 hr an increase of $1,200 personnel costs, $1,200 instead of $0 an increase of $47 miscellaneous costs, $47 instead of $0 Application for Inter-Cooperative Transfer of IFQ. This form may now be submitted online, as well as by fax, by mail, or by courier. a decrease of 140 respondents, 19 instead of 159 (this is a correction based on permit counts) an increase of 2 responses, 161 instead of 159 a decrease of 149 hr burden, 169 hr instead of 318 hr a decrease of $3,725 personnel costs, $4,225 instead of $7,950 a decrease of $1,765 miscellaneous costs, $52 instead of $1,817.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$21,364
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Patsy Bearden 907 586-7008
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
10/08/2009