View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package

OMB Control No: 1902-0096	ICR Reference No: 201103-1902-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201012-1902-006
Agency/Subagency: FERC	Agency Tracking No: FERC-516
Title: FERC-516, (Demand Response, Final Rule in RM10-17) Electric Rate Schedules and Tariff Filings
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR: No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 07/19/2011
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)	Date Received in OIRA: 04/29/2011
Terms of Clearance: In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for 3 years. Upon resubmission, it is suggested the agency revisit annual cost burden estimates.

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	07/31/2014	36 Months From Approved	02/28/2014
Responses	4,718	0	4,650
Time Burden (Hours)	470,301	0	462,501
Cost Burden (Dollars)	143,556	0	143,556

Abstract: In this Final Rule in Docket RM10-17 on Demand Response, FERC amends its regulations under the Federal Power Act to ensure that when a demand response resource participating in an organized wholesale energy market administered by a Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) or Independent System Operator (ISO) has the capability to balance supply and demand as an alternative to a generation resource and when dispatch of that demand response resource is cost-effective as determined by the net benefits test described in this rule, that demand response resource must be compensated for the service it provides to the energy market at the market price for energy, referred to as the locational marginal price (LMP). This approach for compensating demand response resources helps to ensure the competitiveness of organized wholesale energy markets and remove barriers to the participation of demand response resources, thus ensuring just and reasonable wholesale rates. The tariff changes needed to implement the compensation approach required in this Final Rule, including the net benefits test, measurement and verification explanation and proposed changes, and the cost allocation mechanism must be made on or before 7/22/2011. All tariff changes directed herein should be submitted as compliance filings pursuant to this Final Rule, not pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act (FPA). Accordingly, each RTO's or ISO's compliance filing to this Final Rule will become effective prospectively from the date of FERC order addressing that filing, and not within 60 days of submission. In addition, we believe that integrating a determination of the cost-effectiveness of demand response resources into the dispatch of the ISOs and RTOs may be more precise than the monthly price threshold and, therefore, provide the greatest opportunity for load to benefit from participation of demand response in the organized wholesale energy market administered by an RTO or ISO. However, we acknowledge the position of several of the RTOs and ISOs that modification of their dispatch algorithms to incorporate the costs related to demand response may be difficult in the near term. In light of those concerns, we require each RTO and ISO to undertake a study examining the requirements for and impacts of implementing a dynamic approach which incorporates the billing unit effect in the dispatch algorithm to determine when paying demand response resources the LMP results in net benefits to customers in both the day-ahead and real-time energy markets. FERC directs each RTO and ISO to file the results of this study with FERC on or before 9/21/2012.

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 16 USC 824(d) Name of Law: Federal Power Act
PL: Pub.L. 110 - 140 1301, 1305 Name of Law: Energy Independence and Security Act

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
1902-AE02	Final or interim final rulemaking	76 FR 16658	03/24/2011

Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? Yes

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to Agency Discretion
Annual Number of Responses	4,718	4,650	68
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	470,301	462,501	7,800
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	143,556	143,556	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Changing Regulations

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This final rule amends the Commission's regulations to obligate ISOs and RTOs to pay the market price for energy to demand response resources for demand reductions within each respective ISO and RTO region, as applicable. Requiring ISOs and RTOs to pay the market price for energy to demand response resources for demand reductions in response to price signals will potentially reduce the market clearing price of electricity. The Commission has emphasized the importance of demand response as a vehicle for improving the competitiveness of organized wholesale electricity markets and ensuring supplies of energy at just, reasonable and not unduly discriminatory or preferential rates. Paragraphs 83-84 of Order 745 [footnote 166 from the order omitted here] state: "Nearly every participant in the net benefits panel at the September 13, 2010 Technical Conference agreed that it would be counterproductive to defer to the RTO or ISO stakeholder process to determine when demand response provides net benefits without explicit guidance from the Commission. We believe that this result, and the guidance provided in this Final Rule will provide for timely improvements to RTO and ISO market pricing for demand response resources participating in organized wholesale energy markets. In addition to requiring each RTO and ISO to construct the net benefits test described herein, the Commission also imposes a second requirement for each RTO and ISO to undertake a study, examining the requirements for and impacts of implementing a dynamic approach to determine when paying demand response resources LMP results in net benefits to customers. We believe that integration of the billing unit effect into RTO and ISO dispatch algorithms holds promise for more accurately integrating demand resources on a dynamic basis into the dispatch of the RTOs and ISOs. In theory, this could help ensure that the cost-effective level of demand response resources is dispatched or scheduled into the organized wholesale energy markets. Given the potential of software enhancements to determine the amount of cost-effective demand response resources purchased in the day-ahead and real- time energy markets, we believe that it would be useful for the Commission to know more about the feasibility of and requirements for implementing improvements to the existing dispatch algorithms. Therefore, we will require each RTO and ISO to undertake a study, either individually or collectively, examining the requirements for, costs of, and impacts of implementing a dynamic net benefits approach to the dispatch of demand resources that takes into account the billing unit effect in the economic dispatch in both the day-ahead and real-time energy markets, and to file the results of their study with the Commission on or before September 21, 2012." See "Overview" section above for further discussion.

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $148,645

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

Agency Contact: Dennis Hough 202 505-8631 dennis.hough@ferc.gov

View ICR - OIRA Conclusion