Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
1660-0062
ICR Reference No:
201202-1660-001
Status:
Historical Inactive
Previous ICR Reference No:
201104-1660-001
Agency/Subagency:
DHS/FEMA
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
State/Local/Tribal Hazard Mitigation Plans
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Comment filed on proposed rule and continue
Conclusion Date:
08/09/2013
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
04/11/2013
Terms of Clearance:
The agency will respond to comments received on this collection at the final rule stage.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
09/30/2014
36 Months From Approved
09/30/2014
Responses
1,680
0
1,680
Time Burden (Hours)
768,320
0
768,320
Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
Abstract:
The purpose of State Hazard Mitigation Plan requirements is to support State administration of FEMA Mitigation grant programs, and contemplate a significant State commitment to mitigation activities, comprehensive State mitigation planning, and strong program management. Implementation of plans, preidentified, cost-effective mitigation measures will streamline the disaster recovery process. Mitigation Plans is the demonstration of the goals, priorities, to reduce risks from natural hazards. Request is also made to modify the name of the collection to State/Local/Tribal Hazard Mitigation Plans.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 106 - 390 104
Name of Law: Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
PL: Pub.L. 106 - 390 104 Name of Law: Disaster Mitigation Act
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
1660-AA77
Proposed rulemaking
78 FR 13844
03/01/2013
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
5
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Enhanced State Plan Updates
Mitigation Plan Updates
New Local and Tribal Plans
Standard State Plan Updates
State Review of Local and Tribal Plans
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Changing Regulations
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Reduction Due to:
Changing Regulations
Short Statement:
First, an adjustment was made to the methodology used to estimate the number of collections. FEMA has separated out the burden for State Mitigation Plan updates (Standard and Enhanced) from the existing mitigation plan update category thus creating two new categories, one for Standard State Mitigation Plan updates and one for Enhanced State Mitigation Plan updates. Second, an adjustment was made to the methodology used to estimate hour burden based on HMGP and PDM grant awards. Using HMGP and PDM grant awards, FEMA estimates an average cost of $57,000 for New Local and Tribal Plans, $49,000 for Local and Tribal Updates, $205,000 for Standard State Plan Updates, and $524,000 for Enhanced State Plan Updates. These cost estimates were then broken out between personnel costs (23 percent), contracting costs (66 percent), and non-labor costs (11 percent). To calculate hour burden, the percent of costs attributed to personnel costs was divided by an updated Urban and Regional Planner loaded wage rate for each information collections. This resulted in new Average Burden per Response estimates. However, changes to the State Review of Local and Tribal Plans results purely from modification to the number of plans reviewed and the associated wage rate. One effect of this altered approach is that some of the burden previously accounted for in hour burden has likely shifted annual cost estimates. In addition, the decrease in State Mitigation Plan frequency from an update every 3 years to every 5 years also decreases the hour burden that would have otherwise been included. See Question 15 for explanation.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$1,571,254
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Sherina Greene 202 646-4343 sherina.greene@associates.dhs.gov
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
04/11/2013
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
The site is secure.
