Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0648-0372
ICR Reference No:
201403-0648-001
Status:
Historical Inactive
Previous ICR Reference No:
201311-0648-007
Agency/Subagency:
DOC/NOAA
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Electronic Monitoring Systems for Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) (formerly entitled "Vessel Monitoring Systems for Atlantic Highly Migratory Species")
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Comment filed on proposed rule and continue
Conclusion Date:
05/07/2014
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
04/15/2014
Terms of Clearance:
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, OMB is withholding approval at this time. Prior to publication of the final rule, the agency must submit to OMB a summary of all comments related to the information collection contained in the proposed rule and the agency response. The agency should clearly indicate any changes made to the information collection as a result of these comments.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
11/30/2016
11/30/2016
11/30/2016
Responses
37,946
0
37,946
Time Burden (Hours)
1,286
0
1,286
Cost Burden (Dollars)
127,206
0
127,206
Abstract:
This collection is being modified with the electronic monitoring provisions included in draft Amendment 7 to the Consolidated Fishery Management Plan for Highly Migratory Species (HMS). Purse seine vessels are being added to the list of HMS fishing vessels that are required to have a qualified marine electrician install an Enhanced Mobile Transmitting Unit Vessel Monitoring System unit (E-MTU VMS), submit hourly automatic position reports, and hail in and out on fishing trips. Draft Amendment 7 would require that pelagic longline (PLL) and purse seine vessels report bluefin tuna catches via E-MTU message. Draft Amendment 7 would also require PLL vessels to install a video and gear monitoring system and record all catch and relevant data regarding PLL gear deployment and retrieval. These data must be submitted to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for catch monitoring and accounting of individual bluefin tuna quota balances.
Authorizing Statute(s):
US Code:
16 USC 971
Name of Law: Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
0648-BC09
Proposed rulemaking
78 FR 52032
08/21/2013
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
4
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Beginning and Ending Trip declaration through VMS plus cost of annual maintenance and automatic location responses
Blulefin tuna catch and effort reports for pelagic longline and purse seine vessels
Electronic video and gear monitoring requirements
Vessel Monitoring System for Atlantic Highly Migratory Species - Installation, installation and activation checklist
NA
Atlantic HMS installation and activation checklist
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
Program changes: The hours and costs are changed to reflect the addition of potential new requirements under draft Amendment 7, including VMS requirements for purse seine vessels, reports of bluefin tuna interactions for PLL and purse seine vessels, and video and gear monitoring for PLL vessels. There are an additional 20,056 responses, 19,132 hours and $3,620,936 . Adjustments: There are no current capital costs for VMS installations, or any expected in the next three years; however one installation is included here. There are 3 additional respondents. Minor changes in trip numbers changed hail-in/hail out responses and costs, and automatic location costs: an increase of 4 responses, a decrease of 17 hours, and an increase of $25,365 in costs. In the previous submission, VMS maintenance costs were included in the supporting statement, but omitted in ROCIS; thus there is an increase of $154,000, due to correction.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$90,000
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Margo Schulz-Haugen 301 713-0234
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
04/15/2014
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
The site is secure.
