Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0648-0330
ICR Reference No:
201406-0648-010
Status:
Historical Inactive
Previous ICR Reference No:
201210-0648-012
Agency/Subagency:
DOC/NOAA
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
NMFS Alaska Region Scale and Catch Weighing Requirements
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Comment filed on proposed rule and continue
Conclusion Date:
08/08/2014
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
07/31/2014
Terms of Clearance:
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, OMB is withholding approval at this time. Prior to publication of the final rule, the agency must submit to OMB a summary of all comments related to the information collection contained in the proposed rule and the agency response. The agency should clearly indicate any changes made to the information collection as a result of these comments.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
11/30/2015
11/30/2015
11/30/2015
Responses
38,221
0
38,221
Time Burden (Hours)
11,259
0
11,259
Cost Burden (Dollars)
4,942,080
0
4,942,080
Abstract:
verifiable at the level of the individual haul and less dependent on estimates generated by at-sea observers. The use of at-sea scales can provide very precise and potentially accurate estimates of catch. At-sea scales have proven to be reliable and are now used to account for the vast majority of catch by catcher/processors fishing off Alaska. However, recent evidence of fraud calls into question the overall accuracy of the approach and indicates that catch estimates based on scale weights may systematically underestimate harvest in those fisheries dependent on scale weights for catch accounting. The At-sea Scales Program would be modified for catcher/processors and motherships that are required to weigh catch at sea by reducing the possibility of scale tampering and improving the accuracy of catch estimation.
Authorizing Statute(s):
US Code:
16 USC 1801 et seq.
Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
0648-BD90
Proposed rulemaking
79 FR 44372
07/31/2014
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
25
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Bin video monitoring system data storage and maintenance
CMCP inspection request
NA
Catch monitoring and control plan inspection request
CMP inspection request
NA
Catch monitoring plan inspection request
Catch monitor and control plan addendum
Catch monitoring and control plan for shoreside processors aned stationary floating processors
Catch monitoring plan addendum
NA
Catch monitoring plan template
Catcher/processor bin monitoring inspection request form
NA
Inspection request for electronic bin monitoring system
Catcher/processor observer notification of flow scale tests
Catcher/processor observer sampling station costs and annual inspection request form
NA
Inspection request for observer sampling station
Catcher/processor printed output of flow scale, catch weight
Catcher/processor records of daily flow scale tests
NA
Record of daily flow scale tests
Crab catch monitoring plan
NA
Crab Catch Monitoring Plan template
Daily records from hopper scale test
NA
Daily records from hopper scale test
Electronic monitoring system
Inspection request, Chinook salmon bycatch and freezer longline video monitoring systems
NA, NA
Inspection request, electronic monitoring system
,
Inspection request, freezer longline video monitoring system
Inspection request, flow scales
NA
Inspection request for at-sea scales
Inspection request, video for flow scale area
NA
Inspection request, flowscale video monitoring system
Notification of Pacific cod Monitoring Option plus costs from installation of a motion-compensated flow scale
NA
Notification of Pacific Cod Freezer Longline Monitoring Option
Notify Observer of hopper scale tests
Observer notification of CDQ, pollock and rockfish delivery
Printed output flow scale, audit trail
Printed output flow scale, calibration log
Printed output flow scale, fault log
Printed output hopper scale, audit trail
Printed output hopper scale, catch wt
Scale type evaluation
NA, NA, NA
Scale type evaluation - belt scale form
,
Scale type evaluation - automatic hopper scales
,
Scale type evaluation - platform hanging scales
Shoreside or SFP inseason scale tests, printed records from State of Alaska scale
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Changing Regulations
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Reduction Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Short Statement:
Program changes Scale heads & calibration software are required. Includes purchase and installation, $177,000 A new Flow scale video monitoring system is required. Includes purchase and installation, $ 369,000. Inspection request for flow scale video monitoring system an increase of 78 respondents and responses, 78 instead of 0 an increase of 156 hours, 156 instead of 0 hours an increase of $5,772 personnel costs, $5,772 instead of $0 an increase of $26 miscellaneous costs, $26 instead of $0 Printed output flow scale, audit trail [NEW] an increase of 78 respondents, 78 instead of 0 an increase of 10,530 responses, 10,530 instead of 0 an increase of 176 hours, 176 instead of 0 an increase of $6,512 personnel costs, $6,512 instead of $0 Printed output flow scale, calibration log [NEW] an increase of 78 respondents, 78 instead of 0 an increase of 10,530 responses, 10,530 instead of 0 an increase of 176 hours, 176 instead of 0 an increase of $6,512 personnel costs, $6,512 instead of $0 Printed output flow scale, fault log [NEW] an increase of 78 respondents, 78 instead of 0 an increase of 10,530 responses, 10,530 instead of 0 an increase of 176 hours, 176 instead of 0 an increase of $6,512 personnel costs, $6,512 instead of $0 Electronic monitoring system –REMOVED a decrease of 648 responses, 0 instead of 648 a decrease of 648 hours, 0 instead of 648 a decrease of $435,737 in capital costs, 0 instead of $435,737. Net program changes: Increases of 31,020 responses, 36 hours and$110,289. Net adjustments: Decreases of 203 responses, 258 hours and $4,156,663.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$50,051
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Patsy Bearden 907 586-7008
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
07/31/2014
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
The site is secure.
