Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0648-0213
ICR Reference No:
201603-0648-002
Status:
Historical Inactive
Previous ICR Reference No:
201509-0648-008
Agency/Subagency:
DOC/NOAA
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Alaska Region Logbook Family of Forms
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Comment filed on proposed rule and continue
Conclusion Date:
09/22/2016
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
08/19/2016
Terms of Clearance:
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, OMB is withholding approval at this time. Prior to publication of the final rule, the agency must submit to OMB a summary of all comments related to the information collection contained in the proposed rule and the agency response. The agency should clearly indicate any changes made to the information collection as a result of these comments.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
03/31/2018
03/31/2018
03/31/2018
Responses
37,436
0
37,436
Time Burden (Hours)
12,478
0
12,478
Cost Burden (Dollars)
9,501
0
9,501
Abstract:
The proposed action would allow fishermen to use longline pot gear to harvest sablefish in the Gulf of Alaska Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) fishery. Longline pot gear is less prone to whale interactions than hook-and-line gear. Whales can remove sablefish from hook-and-line gear; however, whales cannot remove sablefish from longline pot gear. This action is intended to reduce fishery interactions with whales and reduce the negative impacts of whale interactions on the sablefish IFQ fleet. Also, the action would minimize conflicts between hook-and-line and longline pot gear on the fishing grounds and prevent significant consolidation of sablefish IFQ onto fewer vessels. IFQ fishermen could choose to incur costs to reconfigure their vessel to use longline pot gear or continue to use hook-and-line gear. Vessel operators using longline pot gear would be required to mark the gear according to specifications in regulations, use a vessel monitoring system, complete logbooks, and declare the fishing status of the gear prior to landing their catch.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 94 - 265 303
Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as amended in 2006
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
0648-BF42
Proposed rulemaking
81 FR 55408
08/19/2016
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
7
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Catcher vessel trawl gear daily fishing logbook
NA
Catcher vessel trawl gear daily fishing log
Catcher vessel, longline or pot gear DFL
NA
Catcher Vessel LongLine and Pot Gear DFL
Catcher/processor longline and pot gear DCPL
NA
Catcher-Processor Longline and Pot Gear DCPL
Mothership checkin/checkout report
NA
Mothership checkin/checkout report
Product transfer report (Operators or Managers for non-IFQ groundfish, RCRs and IFQ registered buyers)
NA
Product transfer report
Shoreside processor Check-in/out Report
NA
Shoreside processor check-in/check-out report and instructions
Vessel Activity Report
NA
Vessel Activitiy Report
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Changing Regulations
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
Program Changes This action provides for a commercial fishery for IFQ sablefish using longline pot gear in the GOA. This action is necessary to improve efficiency of the IFQ sablefish fleet and reduce fishery interactions with whales and seabirds. Catcher vessel longline and pot gear DFL an increase of 111 respondents, 321 instead of 210 an increase of 4,107 responses, 11,877 instead of 7,770 an increase of 3,062 hr burden, 6,447 instead of 3,385 an increase of $153,680 personnel costs, $2,386 instead of $156,066 an increase of $1,110 miscellaneous costs, $3,210 instead of $2,100 Catcher/processor longline and pot gear DCPL an increase of 180 hr burden, 1,002 instead of 822 an increase of $6,660 personnel costs, $37,074 instead of $30,414 The following adjustments are necessary in the following forms and logbooks due to changes in number of respondents based on actual rather than estimated values. Catcher vessel trawl gear DFL a decrease of 30 hr burden, 1,588 instead of 1,618 a decrease of $1,110 personnel costs, $58,756 instead of $59,866 Vessel activity report (VAR) a decrease of 14 respondents, 194 instead of 208 a decrease of $148 personnel costs, $1,665 instead of $1,813 a decrease of $6 miscellaneous costs, $460 instead of $466 Shoreside Check-in/Check-out report a decrease of 74 respondents, 124 instead of 50 a decrease of $11,174 personnel costs, $11,470 instead of $296 a decrease of $165 miscellaneous costs, $2,706 instead of $2,871 Mothership Check-in/Check-out report an increase of 5 responses, 30 instead of 25 an increase of 1 hour, 4 instead of 3 an increase of $32 miscellaneous costs, $182 instead of $150.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$169,133
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Patsy Bearden 907 586-7008
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
08/19/2016