View Rule
View EO 12866 Meetings | Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML |
EPA/AR | RIN: 2060-AO04 | Publication ID: Fall 2008 |
Title: Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incineration Units--Response to Remand | |
Abstract: Under section 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is required to adopt and implement maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards for both new and existing hospital/medical/infectious waste incineration units (HMIWI). Regulations for HMIWI were promulgated on September 15, 1997, and those standards have been adopted and fully implemented with all retrofits completed. However, these regulations were subsequently remanded by the Court on March 2, 1999. The fundamental issue leading to the remand was the approach and methodology used by EPA to develop the HMIWI regulations. In effect, the Court questioned whether the regulations developed by EPA reflected the actual emission performance of the best controlled similar unit for new HMIWI and the average of the best performing 12 percent of units for existing HMIWI, and remanded the regulations to EPA for further explanation of its reasoning in determining the minimum regulatory "floors" for new and existing HMIWI. On February 6, 2007, EPA published a proposal that responded to the questions raised in the Court's remand and also addressed the CAA section 129(a)(5) requirement that EPA review and, if necessary, revise standards developed under section 129 every 5 years. Recent Court decisions that impact the February 2007 proposal, as well as issues raised in the public comments regarding that proposal, necessitate a re-proposal of responses to the questions raised in the Court's remand. We note that implementation of these MACT standards has been highly effective, reducing emissions of the nine section 129 pollutants (particulate matter, carbon monoxide, dioxins/furans, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrogen chloride, lead, mercury, and cadmium) by more than 95 percent, and has reduced dioxin/furan and mercury emissions by more than 99 percent since 1995. Additionally, the number of operational units has dropped significantly since promulgation in 1997 from 2,400 units to approximately 60 units today. | |
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) | Priority: Other Significant |
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda | Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Stage |
Major: No | Unfunded Mandates: No |
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 | |
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq |
Legal Deadline:
|
||||||||||||
Timetable:
|
Additional Information: SAN No. 5071; EPA publication information: Original NPRM - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2007/February/Day-06/a1617.htm; NPRM is a re-proposal of remand response; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0534 | |
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No | Government Levels Affected: None |
Small Entities Affected: No | Federalism: No |
Included in the Regulatory Plan: No | |
RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/129/hmiwi/rihmiwi.html | |
RIN Data Printed in the FR: No | |
Agency Contact: Mary Johnson Environmental Protection Agency Air and Radiation 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code D243-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone:919 541-5025 Email: johnson.mary@epa.gov Brian Shrager Environmental Protection Agency Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone:919 541-7689 Fax:919 541-5450 Email: shrager.brian@epa.gov |