|View EO 12866 Meetings||Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML|
|DOL/OLMS||RIN: 1245-AA03||Publication ID: Fall 2011|
|Title: Persuader Agreements: Employer and Labor Relations Consultant Reporting Under the LMRDA|
|Abstract: The Department published a notice and comment rulemaking seeking consideration of a revised interpretation of section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). That statutory provision creates an "advice" exemption from reporting requirements that apply to employers and other persons in connection with persuading employees about the right to organize and bargain collectively. A revised interpretation would narrow the scope of the advice exemption.|
|Agency: Department of Labor(DOL)||Priority: Other Significant|
|RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda||Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Stage|
|Major: No||Unfunded Mandates: No|
|CFR Citation: 29 CFR 405 29 CFR 406|
|Legal Authority: 29 USC 433 29 USC 438|
Statement of Need: The Department of Labor proposed a regulatory initiative to better implement the public disclosure objectives of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) regarding employer-consultant agreements to persuade employees concerning their rights to organize and bargain collectively. Under LMRDA section 203, an employer must report any agreement or arrangement with a third party consultant to persuade employees as to their collective bargaining rights or to obtain certain information concerning the activities of employees or a labor organization in connection with a labor dispute involving the employer. The consultant also is required to report concerning such an agreement or arrangement with an employer. Statutory exceptions to these reporting requirements are set forth in LMRDA section 203(c), which provides, in part, that employers and consultants are not required to file a report by reason of the consultant's giving or agreeing to give "advice" to the employer. The Department's proposal stated that its current policy concerning the scope of the "advice exception" is overbroad and that a narrower construction would better allow for the employer and consultant reporting intended by the LMRDA. The proposal stated that regulatory action is needed to provide workers with information critical to their effective participation in the workplace.
Summary of the Legal Basis: This proposed rulemaking is authorized under U.S.C. sections 433 and 438 and applies to regulations at 29 CFR part 405 and 29 CFR part 406.
Alternatives: Alternatives will be developed and considered in the course of notice and comment rulemaking.
Anticipated Costs and Benefits: Anticipated costs and benefits of this proposed regulatory initiative have not been assessed and will be determined at a later date, as appropriate.
Risks: This action does not affect public health, safety, or the environment.
|Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No||Government Levels Affected: None|
|Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes|
|RIN Information URL: www.olms.dol.gov||Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov|
|RIN Data Printed in the FR: No|
|Related RINs: Previously reported as 1215-AB79|
Andrew R. Davis
Chief, Division of Interpretations and Standards, Office of Labor-Management Standards
Department of Labor
Office of Labor-Management Standards
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room N-5609, FP Building,
Washington, DC 20210