View Rule

View EO 12866 Meetings Printer-Friendly Version     Download RIN Data in XML

USDA/FS RIN: 0596-AC49 Publication ID: Spring 2008 
Title: Forest Service National Environmental Policy Act Procedures 
Abstract: This rule gives Forest Service National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Procedures more visibility, consistent with the transparent nature of the Agency's environmental analysis and decisionmaking. Also, additions to the Forest Service NEPA procedures in this rule are intended to provide an environmental analysis process that better fits with modern thinking on decisionmaking, collaboration, and adaptive management to meet the intent of NEPA by describing a process for incremental alternative development and development of adaptive management alternatives. Previously, Forest Service NEPA procedures and agency guidance were combined in FSH 1909.15. Making changes to agency NEPA guidance in the Handbook previously involved consultation with CEQ pursuant to 40 CFR 1507.3 because the Handbook does not differentiate between NEPA “guidance” and “procedures.” This was time-consuming for both agencies when updating simple guidance. Having agency NEPA procedures in the CFR, separate from internal guidance, will streamline the agency process for maintaining that internal guidance. General NEPA guidance and internal processes will continue to be set out in the FSH 1909.15 Handbook. Since the last major update of Forest Service NEPA policy in 1992, CEQ has issued guidance concerning emergency alternative arrangements under NEPA; guidance on preparing focused, concise, and timely environmental assessments; and guidance on consideration of past actions in cumulative effects analysis. The Agency incorporated this guidance in its regulation. The rule also incorporates concepts that are currently used, but for which there have been no explicit provisions in procedures. Specifically, these changes: -- Clarify actions subject to NEPA by summarizing the relevant CEQ regulations in one place. -- Recognize agency obligations to take immediate emergency responses and emphasize the options available for subsequent proposals to address actions related to the emergency when normal NEPA processes are not possible. -- Incorporate CEQ guidance language regarding what past actions are “relevant and useful” to a cumulative effects analysis. -- Clarify that an alternative(s), including the proposed action, may be modified through an incremental process. -- Clarify that adaptive management strategies may be incorporated into an alternative(s), including the proposed action. -- Incorporate CEQ guidance that states environmental assessments (EAs) need only analyze alternatives to the proposed action if there are no unresolved conflicts concerning alterative uses of available resources. The CEQ was consulted on the proposed and final rule to ensure the rule is in compliance with NEPA and the CEQ regulations. The draft NEPA procedures were published in the Federal Register on August 16, 2007, for a 60-day comment period. The Agency received 10,975 responses, consisting of letters, e-mails, web based submissions, and faxes. Of those, approximately 200 contained original substantive comments; the remaining responses were organized response campaign (form) letters. Comments were received from the public, from within the Agency, and from other agencies. The Department considered all the comments and made a number of adjustments to the rule in response. While most of the adjustments were editorial in nature to improve clarity, the following substantive changes were made: • “Schedule of Proposed Actions” was added to the definitions and largely removed from the procedures because most of the language was guidance and more appropriate to the Forest Service Handbook; • “Preliminary Environmental Impact Statement” was deleted from the definitions and procedures due to confusion surrounding intent and perceived requirements; • A sentence was added to the categories requiring a project file and decision memo to the effect that a plan approval document required by 36 CFR 219.7 satisfies the decision memo requirements of this part. • One class of actions normally requiring an EIS, “Other proposals to take major Federal actions that may significantly affect the quality of the human environment” was removed because it was not a class of actions and such actions would always require an EIS. • A provision for optionally describing the effects of no action in an EIS was removed because of confusion surrounding perceived requirements and perceived conflicts with CEQ regulations. 
Agency: Department of Agriculture(USDA)  Priority: Other Significant 
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Stage 
Major: No  Unfunded Mandates: No 
CFR Citation: 36 CFR 220   
Legal Authority: 40 CFR 1507.3   
Legal Deadline:  None
Timetable:
Action Date FR Cite
NPRM  08/16/2007  72 FR 45998   
NPRM Comment Period End  10/15/2007    
Final Action  05/00/2008    
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No  Government Levels Affected: None 
Small Entities Affected: No  Federalism: No 
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes 
RIN Information URL: www.fs.fed.us/emc/nepa   Public Comment URL: nepa_procedures/index.htm  
RIN Data Printed in the FR: No 
Agency Contact:
Michael McGee
Regulatory Analyst
Department of Agriculture
Forest Service
MS 1134, ATTN: ORMS, D&R Branch, 1400 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20250-0003
Phone:202 205-2601
Fax:202 260-6539
Email: mmcgee01@fs.fed.us