DEPARTMENT OF THE
TREASURY (TREAS)
Statement of
Regulatory Priorities
The
primary missions of the Department of the Treasury are:
To promote prosperous and stable American and world economies,
including promoting domestic economic growth and maintaining our Nation's
leadership in global economic issues, supervising national banks and thrift
institutions, and helping to bring residents of distressed communities into the
economic mainstream.
- To
manage the Government's finances by protecting the revenue and collecting
the correct amount of revenue under the Internal Revenue Code, overseeing
customs revenue functions, financing the Federal Government and managing
its fiscal operations, and producing our Nation's coins and currency.
- To
safeguard the U.S. and international financial systems from those who
would use these systems for illegal purposes or to compromise U.S.
national security interests, while keeping them free and open to
legitimate users.
Consistent with these
missions, most regulations of the Department and its constituent bureaus are
promulgated to interpret and implement the laws as enacted by the Congress and
signed by the President. It is the policy of the Department to comply with
requirements to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking and carefully consider
public comments before adopting a final rule. Also, in particular cases, the
Department invites interested parties to submit views on rulemaking projects
while a proposed rule is being developed.
In
response to the events of September 11, 2001, the President signed the USA
PATRIOT Act of 2001 into law on October 26, 2001. Since then, the Department
has accorded the highest priority to developing and issuing regulations to
implement the provisions in this historic legislation that target money
laundering and terrorist financing. These efforts, which will continue during
the coming year, are reflected in the regulatory priorities of the Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).
To the
extent permitted by law, it is the policy of the Department to adhere to the
regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in Executive Order 12866, and to
develop regulations that maximize aggregate net benefits to society while
minimizing the economic and paperwork burdens imposed on persons and businesses
subject to those regulations.
Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act
On October 3, 2008,
the President signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA)
(Pub. L. 110-334). Section 101(a) of EESA authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury to establish a Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to "purchase, and
to make and fund commitments to purchase, troubled assets from any financial
institution, on such terms and conditions as are determined by the Secretary, and
in accordance with this Act and policies and procedures developed and published
by the Secretary."
EESA provides
authority to issue regulations and guidance to implement the program.
Regulations and guidance required by EESA include conflicts of interest,
executive compensation, and tax guidance. The Secretary is also charged with
establishing a program that will guarantee principal of, and interest on,
troubled assets originated or issued prior to March 14, 2008.
The Department has
issued guidance and regulations and will continue to provide program
information through the next year. Regulatory actions taken to date include
the following:
Executive
compensation.
In October 2008, the Department issued an interim final rule that set forth
executive compensation guidelines for the TARP Capital Purchase Program (73 FR
62205). Related tax guidance on executive compensation was announced in IRS
Notice 2008-94. In addition, among other EESA tax guidance, the IRS issued
interim guidance regarding loss corporation and ownership changes in Notice
2008-100, providing that any shares of stock owned by the Department of the
Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program will not be considered to cause
Treasury's ownership in such corporation to increase. On June 15, 2009, the
Department issued a revised interim final rule that sets forth executive
compensation guidelines for all TARP program participants (74 FR 28394),
implementing amendments to the executive compensation provisions of EESA made
by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L.111-5). Public
comments on the revised interim final rule regarding executive compensation
were due by August 14, 2009 and will be considered as part of the process of
issuing a final rule on this subject.
Insurance
program for trouble assets. On October 14, 2008, the Department released a request
for public input on an insurance program for troubled assets.
Conflicts
of interest.
On January 21, 2009, the Department issued an interim final rule providing
guidance on conflicts of interest pursuant to section 108 of EESA (74 FR
3431). Comments on the interim final rule, which were due by March 23, 2009,
will be considered as part of the process of issuing a final rule.
During Fiscal Year 2010,
the Department will continue implementing the EESA authorities to restore
capital flows to the consumers and businesses that form the core of the
nation's economy.
Terrorism Risk
Insurance Program Office
The Terrorism Risk
Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA) was signed into law on November 26, 2002. The
law, which was enacted as a consequence of the events of September 11, 2001,
established a temporary Federal reinsurance program under which the Federal
Government shares the risk of losses associated with certain types of terrorist
acts with commercial property and casualty insurers. The Act, originally
scheduled to expire on December 31, 2005, was extended to December 31, 2007 by
the Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act of 2005 (TRIEA). The Act has since
been extended to December 31, 2014, by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2007 (TRIPRA).
The Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions is responsible for developing
and promulgating regulations implementing TRIA, as extended and amended by
TRIEA and TRIPRA. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Office, which is part
of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions, is
responsible for operational implementation of TRIA. The purposes of this
legislation are to address market disruptions, ensure the continued widespread
availability and affordability of commercial property and casualty insurance
for terrorism risk, and to allow for a transition period for the private
markets to stabilize and build capacity while preserving State insurance
regulation and consumer protections.
Over the past year,
the Office of the Assistant Secretary has issued proposed rules implementing
changes authorized by TRIA as revised by TRIPRA. The following regulations
should be published by December 31, 2009:
- Recoupment
of Federal Share of Compensation for Insured Losses. This final rule
would implement and establish requirements for determining amounts to be
recouped and for procedures insurers are to use for collecting terrorism
policy surcharges and remitting them to the Treasury.
- Cap
on Annual Liability and Pro Rata Share of Insured Losses. This final rule
would establish, for purposes of the $100 billion cap on annual
liability, how Treasury will determine whether aggregate insured losses
will exceed $100 billion and, if so, how Treasury will determine the pro
rata share of insured losses to be paid by each insurer that incurs
insured losses under the Program.
During 2010,
Treasury will continue the ongoing work of implementing TRIA and carrying out revised
operations as a result of the TRIPRA related regulation changes.
Customs Revenue
Functions
On
November 25, 2002, the President signed the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (the
Act), establishing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The Act
transferred the United States Customs Service from the Department of the
Treasury to the DHS, where it is was known as the Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection (CBP). Effective March 31, 2007, DHS changed the name of the Bureau
of Customs and Border Protection to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
pursuant to section 872(a)(2) of the Act (6 USC 452(a)(2)) in a Federal
Register notice (72 FR 20131) published on April 23, 2007. Notwithstanding the
transfer of the Customs Service to DHS, the Act provides that the Secretary of
the Treasury retains sole legal authority over the customs revenue functions.
The Act also authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to delegate any of the
retained authority over customs revenue functions to the Secretary of Homeland
Security. By Treasury Department Order No. 100-16, the Secretary of the
Treasury delegated to the Secretary of Homeland Security authority to prescribe
regulations pertaining to the customs revenue functions. This Order further
provided that the Secretary of the Treasury retained the sole authority to
approve any such regulations concerning import quotas or trade bans, user fees,
marking, labeling, copyright and trademark enforcement, and the completion of
entry or substance of entry summary including duty assessment and collection,
classification, valuation, application of the U.S. Harmonized Schedules,
eligibility or requirements for preferential trade programs and the
establishment of recordkeeping requirements relating thereto.
During the past
fiscal year, among the Treasury-retained CBP customs-revenue function
regulations issued was
an interim rule to amend the regulatory provisions relating to the requirement
under the United States-Bahrain FTA (BFTA) that a good must be "imported
directly" from Bahrain to the United States or from the United States to
Bahrain to qualify for preferential tariff treatment. The change removed the
condition that a good passing through the territory of an intermediate country
must remain under the control of the customs authority of the intermediate
country. CBP plans to finalize this rulemaking in the upcoming fiscal year.
In addition, during
the past fiscal year, CBP amended the regulations on an interim basis to
implement certain provisions of the Tom Lantos Block Burmese JADE (Junta's
Anti-Democratic Efforts) Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-286) (the "JADE
Act") and Presidential Proclamation 8294 of September 26, 2008, which
includes new Additional U.S. Note 4 to Chapter 71 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States ("HTSUS"). The interim amendments prohibit the
importation of Burmese-covered articles of jadeite, rubies and articles of
jewelry containing jadeite or rubies, and sets forth restrictions for the
importation of non-Burmese covered articles of jadeite, rubies and articles of
jewelry containing jadeite or rubies.
As a
result of last year's "Farm Bill" legislation, CBP implemented interim
regulations on the Softwood Lumber Act of 2008, which prescribed special entry
requirements as well as an importer declaration program applicable to certain
softwood lumber (SWL) and SWL products exported from any country into the
United States; CBP plans to finalize the interim rule in the upcoming fiscal
year.
During fiscal year 2010,
CBP and Treasury plan to give priority to the following regulatory matters
involving the customs revenue functions not delegated to DHS:
- Trade
Act of 2002's preferential trade benefit provisions. Treasury and
CBP plan to finalize several interim regulations that implement the trade
benefit provisions of the Trade Act of 2002 including the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act and the African Growth and Opportunity Act.
- Free
Trade Agreements.
Treasury and CBP also plan to finalize interim regulations this fiscal
year to implement the preferential tariff treatment provisions of the
United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act and the
Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (also known as
"CAFTA-DR")
Implementation
Act. Treasury and CBP expect to issue interim regulations implementing
the United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, the
United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, and the United
States-Peru Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act.
- Country
of Origin of Textile and Apparel Products. Treasury and
CBP also plan to publish a final rule adopting an interim rule that was
published on the Country of Origin of Textile and Apparel Products, which
implemented the changes brought about, in part, by the expiration of the
Agreement on Textile and Clothing and the resulting elimination of quotas
on the entry of textile and apparel products from World Trade
Organizations (WTO) members.
- North
American Free Trade Agreement country of origin rules. Treasury and CBP
are determining how to proceed regarding a proposal which was published in
July 2008 seeking public comment regarding uniform rules governing the
determination of the country of origin of imported merchandise. The
proposal attracted considerable interest from the trading community. If
finalized, the proposed amendments would extend the application of the
North American Free Trade Agreement country of origin rules to all trade.
- Customs
Modernization provisions of the North American Free Trade Implementation
Act (Customs Mod Act). Treasury and CBP also plan to continue moving
forward with amendments to improve its regulatory procedures began under
the authority granted by the Customs Mod Act. These efforts, in
accordance with the principles of Executive Order 12866, have involved and
will continue to involve significant input from the importing public. CBP
will also continue to test new programs to see if they work before
proceeding with proposed rulemaking to establish permanently the
programs. Consistent with this practice, we expect to finalize a proposal
to establish permanently the remote location filing program, which
has been a test program under the Customs Mod Act. This rule would allow
remote location filing of electronic entries of
merchandise from a location other than where the merchandise will arrive.
In addition, Treasury and CBP plan to finalize a proposal which was
published in August 2008 regarding the electronic payment and refund of
quarterly harbor maintenance fees. The rule would provide the trade
with expanded electronic payment/refund options for quarterly harbor
maintenance fees and would modernize and enhance CBP's port use fee
collection efforts.
Community Development
Financial Institutions Fund
The Community Development
Financial Institutions Fund (Fund) was established by the Community Development
Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.).
The primary purpose of the Fund is to promote economic revitalization and
community development through the following programs: the Community Development
Financial Institutions (CDFI) Program, the Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program,
the Native American CDFI Assistance (NACA) Program, and the New Markets Tax
Credit (NMTC) Program. In addition the Fund administers the Financial
Education and Counseling Pilot Program (FEC) and the Capital Magnet Fund (CMF).
In
fiscal year (FY) 2010, subject to funding availability, the Fund will provide awards
through the following programs:
Native American CDFI Assistance (NACA) Program. Through the NACA
Program, the Fund will provide technical assistance grants and financial
assistance awards to promote the development of CDFIs that serve Native
American, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian communities.
Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program. Through the BEA Program, the Fund
will provide financial incentives to encourage insured depository institutions
to engage in eligible development activities and to make equity investments in
CDFIs.
- New
Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) Program. Through the NMTC Program, the CDFI
Fund will provide allocations of tax credits to qualified community
development entities (CDEs). The CDEs in turn provide tax credits to
private sector investors in exchange for their investment dollars;
investment proceeds received by the CDEs are be used to make loans and
equity investments in low-income communities. The Fund administers the
NMTC Program in coordination with the Office of Tax Policy and the
Internal Revenue Service.
- Financial
Education and Counseling (FEC) Pilot Program. Through the
FEC Pilot Program, the CDFI Fund will provide grants to eligible
organizations to provide a range of financial education and counseling
services to prospective homebuyers. The Fund will administer the FEC
Program in coordination with the Office of Financial Education.
- Capital
Magnet Fund (CMF). Through the Capital Magnet Fund, the CDFI Fund
will provide competitively awarded grants to CDFIs and qualified nonprofit
housing organizations to finance affordable housing and related community
development projects. In FY 2010, the Fund expects to draft and publish
regulations to govern the application process, award selection, and
compliance components of the CMF.
Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network
As chief
administrator of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), FinCEN's regulations constitute
the core of the Department's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism
financing programmatic efforts. FinCEN's responsibilities and objectives are
linked to, and flow from, that role. In fulfilling this role, FinCEN seeks to
enhance U.S. national security by making the financial system increasingly
resistant to abuse by money launderers, terrorists and their financial
supporters, and other perpetrators of crime.
The
Secretary of the Treasury, through FinCEN, is authorized by the BSA to issue
regulations requiring financial institutions to file reports and keep records
that are determined to have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or
regulatory matters, or in the conduct of intelligence or counter-intelligence
activities to protect against international terrorism. Those regulations also
require designated financial institutions to establish anti-money laundering
programs and compliance procedures. To implement and realize its mission,
FinCEN has established regulatory objectives and priorities to safeguard the
financial system from the abuses of financial crime, including terrorist
financing, money laundering, and other illicit activity. These objectives and
priorities include: (1) issuing, interpreting, and enforcing compliance with
regulations implementing the BSA; (2) supporting, working with, and, as
appropriate, overseeing compliance examination functions delegated to other
Federal regulators; (3) managing the collection, processing, storage, and
dissemination of data related to the BSA; (4) maintaining a Government-wide
access service to that same data, and for network users with overlapping
interests; (5) conducting analysis in support of policymakers, law enforcement,
regulatory and intelligence agencies, and the financial sector; and (6)
coordinating with and collaborating on anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering
initiatives with domestic law enforcement and intelligence agencies, as well as
foreign financial intelligence units.
During
fiscal year 2009, FinCEN issued, or plans to issue, the following regulatory
actions:
Currency
Transaction Reporting Exemptions. FinCEN published a Final Rule that
simplifies the existing currency transaction reporting (CTR) exemption
regulatory requirements. The amendments were recommended by the Government
Accountability Office in GAO-08-355. By simplifying the regulatory requirements
regarding CTR exemptions, FinCEN believes that more depository institutions
will avail themselves of the exemptions. The rule was finalized with an
effective date of January 5, 2009.
Administrative
Rulings.
Prior to the end of the fiscal year, FinCEN will issue a final technical rule
change to update the Bank Secrecy Act provisions to reflect that Administrative
Rulings are published on the FinCEN Web site, rather than in the Federal
Register.
- Reorganization
of BSA Rules.
On October 23, 2008, FinCEN issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
re-designate and reorganize the BSA regulations in a new chapter within
the Code of Federal Regulations. The re-designation and reorganization of
the regulations in a new chapter is not intended to alter regulatory
requirements. The regulations will be organized in a more consistent and
intuitive structure that more easily allows financial institutions to
identify their specific regulatory requirements under the BSA. The new
chapter will replace 31 CFR Part 103.
- Money
Services Businesses. On May 12, 2009, FinCEN issued a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking addressing definitional thresholds for Money Services
Businesses (MSBs), incorporating previously issued Administrative Rules
and guidance with regard to MSBs, and addressing the issue of
foreign-located MSBs.
- Confidentiality
of Suspicious Activity Reports. On March 3, 2009, FinCEN issued a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking clarifying the non-disclosure provisions
with respect to the existing regulations pertaining to the confidentiality
of suspicious activity reports (SARs). In conjunction with this notice,
FinCEN issued for comment two guidance documents, SAR Sharing with
Affiliates for depository institutions and SAR Sharing with Affiliates for
securities and futures industry entities, to solicit comment permitting
certain financial institutions to share SARs with their U.S. affiliates that are also subject to SAR reporting requirements.
Mutual
Funds. On
June 5, 2009, FinCEN issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking addressing the
definition of financial institution in the BSA's implementing regulations to
include open-end investment companies (mutual funds). Despite the fact that
mutual funds are already required to comply with anti-money laundering and customer
identification program requirements, file SARs, comply with due diligence
obligations pursuant to rules implementing section 312 of the USA PATRIOT Act,
and perform other BSA compliance functions, a mutual fund is not designated as
a 'financial institution' under the BSA implementing regulations. The proposed
rule would address obligations to file Currency Transaction Reports for cash
transactions over $10,000 in lieu of current obligations to file Form 8300s.
Non-Bank
Residential Mortgage Lenders and Originators. On July 21, 2009, FinCEN issued an
Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) to solicit public comment on a
wide range of questions pertaining to the possible application of anti-money
laundering (AML) program and suspicious activity report regulations to a
specific sub-set of loan and finance companies, i.e., non-bank residential
mortgage lenders and originators
Expansion
of Special Information Sharing Procedures (pursuant to section 314(a) of the
BSA).
Prior to the end of the fiscal year, FinCEN will issue a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to amend the BSA regulations to allow certain foreign law
enforcement agencies, State and local law enforcement agencies, and FinCEN
itself to submit requests for information to financial institutions.
Withdrawal
of Proposed Rules.
On October 30, 2008, FinCEN withdrew the proposed rules (issued in 2002 and
2003) for investment advisers, commodity trading advisors, and unregistered
investment companies. The proposed rules were withdrawn to eliminate
uncertainty associated with the existence of out-of-date proposed rules, and to
allow FinCEN to issue new notices of proposed rulemaking at a later date that
take into account industry regulatory developments with respect to investment
advisers, commodity trading advisors, and unregistered investment companies
since 2003.
Renewal
of Existing Rules.
FinCEN renewed without change the information collections associated with the
existing regulations requiring money services businesses, mutual funds,
operators of credit card systems, dealers in precious metals, precious stones,
or jewels, and certain insurance companies to develop and implement written
anti-money laundering programs. Also, FinCEN renewed without change the
information collections associated with the existing regulations requiring
futures commission merchants, introducing brokers in commodities, banks,
savings associations, credit unions, certain non-federally regulated banks,
mutual funds, and securities broker-dealers to develop and implement customer
identification programs.
Administrative
Rulings and Written Guidance. FinCEN issued 10 Administrative Rulings and
written guidance pieces (as of August 2009) interpreting the BSA and providing
clarity to regulated industries.
FinCEN's
regulatory priorities for fiscal year 2010 include finalizing the proposed
initiatives mentioned above, as well as the following projects:
Anti-Money
Laundering Programs.
Pursuant to section 352 of the USA PATRIOT Act, certain financial institutions
are required to establish AML programs. Continued from fiscal year 2009,
FinCEN will propose a rulemaking to require state-chartered credit unions and
other depository institutions without a federal functional regulator to
implement AML programs. With the added information from the ANPRM regarding
non-bank residential mortgage lenders or originators, FinCEN will research and
analyze issues regarding potential regulation of the loan and finance industry,
and may issue proposed rulemaking with regard to non-bank residential mortgage
lenders and originators. Finally, FinCEN also will continue to consider
regulatory options regarding certain corporate and trust service providers.
Regulatory
Framework for Stored Value. The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and
Disclosure Act (CARD Act) of 2009 (Section 503) requires FinCEN to issue a
final rule "regarding issuance, sale, redemption, or international transport of
stored value" by mid-February 2010. This act has imposed a timetable to
activities that were already underway. Just prior to the enactment of the CARD
Act, FinCEN issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking clarifying the
applicability of BSA regulations with respect to MSB activities. As part of
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FinCEN solicited comment on the treatment
of stored value as money transmission under FinCEN's regulations. In the
accelerated rulemaking environment resulting from the CARD Act, FinCEN is
consulting with law enforcement and other regulators with the intent to issue a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and then a Final Rule to meet the established
deadline. FBAR Requirements. FinCEN will work with the IRS and other
pertinent offices within the Department of the Treasury to issue a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking with regard to revising the regulations governing the
filing of Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBARs). Among other
things, FinCEN and the IRS will seek comments regarding when a person with
signature authority over, but no financial interest in, a foreign financial
account should be relieved of filing an FBAR for the account, and when an
interest in a foreign entity (e.g., a corporation, partnership, trust or
estate) should be subject to FBAR reporting.
Other Requirements. FinCEN will continue
to consider
regulatory action in conjunction with the feasibility study prepared pursuant
to the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 concerning the
issue of obtaining information about certain cross-border funds transfers and
transmittals of funds. FinCEN also will continue to issue proposed and final
rules pursuant to Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act, as appropriate. Finally,
FinCEN expects to propose various technical and other regulatory amendments in
conjunction with its ongoing, comprehensive review of existing regulations to
enhance regulatory efficiency.
Internal Revenue
Service
The Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), working with the Office of the Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy),
promulgates regulations that interpret and implement the Internal Revenue Code
and related tax statutes. The purpose of these regulations is to carry out the
tax policy determined by Congress in a fair, impartial, and reasonable manner,
taking into account the intent of Congress, the realities of relevant
transactions, the need for the Government to administer the rules and monitor
compliance, and the overall integrity of the Federal tax system. The goal is
to make the regulations practical and as clear and simple as possible.
Most IRS
regulations interpret tax statutes to resolve ambiguities or fill gaps in the
tax statutes. This includes interpreting particular words, applying rules to
broad classes of circumstances, and resolving apparent and potential conflicts
between various statutory provisions.
During fiscal year
2010, the IRS will accord priority to the following regulatory projects:
Deduction
and Capitalization of Costs for Tangible Assets. Section 162 of the
Internal Revenue Code allows a current deduction for ordinary and necessary
expenses paid or incurred in carrying on any trade or business. Under section
263(a) of the Code, no immediate deduction is allowed for amounts paid out for
new buildings or for permanent improvements or betterments made to increase the
value of any property or estate. Those expenditures are capital expenditures
that generally may be recovered only in future taxable years, as the property
is used in the taxpayer's trade or business. It often is not clear whether an
amount paid to acquire, produce, or improve property is a deductible expense or
a capital expenditure. Although existing regulations provide that a deductible
repair expense is an expenditure that does not materially add to the value of
the property or appreciably prolong its life, the IRS and Treasury believe that
additional clarification is needed to reduce uncertainty and controversy in
this area. In August 2006, the IRS and Treasury issued proposed regulations in
this area and received numerous comments. In March 2008, the IRS and Treasury
withdrew the 2006 proposed regulations and issued new proposed regulations,
which have generated relatively few comments. The IRS and Treasury intend to
finalize those regulations.
- Arbitrage Investment Restrictions on
Tax-Exempt Bonds. The arbitrage investment restrictions on
tax-exempt bonds under section 148 generally limit issuers from investing
bond proceeds higher-yielding investments. Treasury and the IRS plan to
issue proposed regulations to address selected current issues involving the
arbitrage restrictions, including clarification of the issue price
definition used in the computation of bond yield, clarification and
simplification of the rules regarding modifications and terminations of
qualified hedging transactions, guidance on the treatment of working
capital financing, and selected other issues.
- Tax
Credit Bonds.
Tax credit bonds are bonds in which the holder receives a federal tax
credit in lieu of some or all of the interest on the bond. The American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created a number of new types of tax
credit bonds and modified the law as it concerned several existing types
of tax credit bonds. The IRS and Treasury intend to provide guidance on
numerous legal issues concerning tax credit bonds and to develop clear
guidelines for the IRS Tax Exempt Bond enforcement program.
- Build America Bonds. Treasury and
the IRS plan to issue proposed regulations to provide guidance on
interpretative issues that have arisen in implementing the broad new Build
America Bond program in section 54AA under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009.
- Private Activity Bonds. Treasury and
the IRS to issue final regulations on allocation and accounting rules for
application of the private business restrictions on tax-exempt
governmental bonds under section 141. These regulations will include
guidance on public-private partnerships and mixed use arrangements in
which projects are used in part by State and local governments and in part
by private businesses. These regulations will finalize 2006 proposed
regulations with modifications in consideration of the public comments.
- Guidance
on the Tax Treatment of Distressed Debt. Recent events
in the financial markets have highlighted a number of unresolved tax
issues relating to the amount, character, and timing of income, expense,
gain, or loss on distressed debt. In addition, the tax treatment of
distressed debt, including distressed debt that has been modified, may
affect the qualification of certain entities for tax purposes or result in
additional taxes on the investors in such entities, such as regulated
investment companies, real estate investment trusts, and real estate
mortgage investment conduits. During fiscal year 2009, Congress,
Treasury, and the IRS have addressed some of these issues through
statutory changes and published guidance. Treasury and the IRS plan to
address more of these issues in published guidance.
- Classification
of Series LLCs and Cell Companies. Series LLCs were first introduced in Delaware in 1996, and since then, series LLC statutes have been adopted in several other
states. These statutes typically permit the entity to segregate assets
and liabilities and to associate certain members with specified assets and
liabilities. In the insurance and foreign arena, similar entities are
sometimes referred to as cell companies. In Notice 2008-19, the IRS
requested comments on when a cell of a protected cell company should be
treated as a separate insurance company for federal income tax purposes. The
IRS also requested comments on similar segregated arrangements, such as
series LLCs that do not involve insurance. It is likely that, over time,
the use of series LLCs and cell companies will increase. Accordingly, it
is important to provide timely guidance to clarify the classification and
other tax treatment of this new form of organization. Guidance has been requested
on the federal tax classification of these domestic and foreign entities.
The IRS and Treasury intend to issue guidance that will address the
characterization of domestic and foreign series and cells for federal tax
purposes.
- Elective
Deferral of Certain Business Discharge of Indebtedness Income. In the recent
economic downturn, many business taxpayers realized income as a result of
modifying the terms of their outstanding indebtedness or refinancing on
terms subjecting them to less risk of default. The American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 includes a special relief provision allowing for
the elective deferral of certain discharge of indebtedness income realized
in 2009 and 2010. The provision, section 108(i) of the Code, is
complicated and many of the details will have to be supplied through
regulatory guidance. This guidance will have to be provided expeditiously
so taxpayers will be able to evaluate the benefits of electing deferral.
Treasury and the IRS recently issued Revenue Procedure 2009-37 that
prescribes the procedure for making the election. The IRS and Treasury
intend to issue additional guidance on such issues as the types of
indebtedness eligible for the relief, acceleration of deferred amounts,
the operation of the provision in the context of flow-through entities,
the treatment of the discharge for the purpose of computing earnings and
profits, and the operation of a provision of the statute deferring
original issue discount deductions with respect to related refinancings.
- Rules
under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 and Other Retirement-Related
Guidance. Significant new rules regarding the funding of qualified
defined benefit pension plans were enacted as part of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006 (PPA). The IRS and Treasury prioritized the
various pieces of guidance required to comply with those rules. The IRS
and Treasury intend to issue additional guidance on the provisions of the
PPA related to funding. In addition, the IRS and Treasury will be issuing
various items of administrative guidance that facilitate or enhance
retirement savings and security.
- Withholding
on Government Payments for Property and Services. Section
3402(t) was added to the Internal Revenue Code by the Tax Increase
Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (TIPRA). Section 3402(t)
requires all Federal, State and local Government entities (except for
certain small State entities) to deduct and withhold an income tax equal
to 3 percent from all payments (with certain enumerated exceptions) the
Government entity makes for property or services. Section 3402(t) will be
effective with respect to payments made after December 31, 2011. On March
11, 2008, the IRS issued Notice 2008-38 soliciting public comments
regarding guidance to be provided to Federal, State and local governments
required to withhold under section 3402(t). After considering the many
comments, the IRS and Treasury issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
which was published in the Federal Register on December 4, 2008. A
hearing on the proposed regulations was held on April 16, 2009, and the
IRS has received 168 comments from stakeholders on the proposed regulations.
The IRS and Treasury are considering the comments and intend to issue
final regulations.
- Information
Reporting of Basis by Brokers and Others. Section 403 of the Energy
Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 (Pub. L. No. 110-343) enacted on October
3, 2008, amended section 6045 to require brokers to report both the basis
and gross proceeds of securities sold by customers. Form 1099-B is used
for this purpose. Basis reporting generally will be required for stock
acquired after December 31, 2010. Basis reporting will be required for
debt securities, such as bonds, acquired after December 31, 2012. The
legislation also imposed basis reporting requirements on others in certain
circumstances. The IRS and Treasury intend to issue proposed and final
regulations under to address these new reporting requirements.
- Information
Reporting Concerning Payment Card Transactions. Section 6050W
was added to the Internal Revenue Code by the Housing Assistance Tax Act
of 2008, enacted on July 30, 2008. Section 6050W requires information
returns to be made for each calendar year beginning after December 31,
2010, by merchant-acquiring entities and third-party settlement
organizations with respect to payment card transactions and third-party
payment network transactions occurring in that calendar year.
Certain payment card transactions subject to information reporting under
section 6050W are subject to backup withholding if the payee has not
provided a valid taxpayer identification number (TIN). Announcement 2009-6,
2009-9 IRB 643 (Feb. 6, 2009), advised section 6050W filers that
they may participate in the TIN matching program under the procedures
established in Rev. Proc. 2003-9, 2003-1 C.B. 516, which permits program
participants to verify the payee TINs required to be reported on
information returns and payee statements. Notice 2009-19, 2009-10
IRB 660 (Feb. 20, 2009), requested public comments
regarding guidance to be provided to payment settlement entities and other
affected persons concerning the new requirements under section 6050W. The
IRS and Treasury intend to issue proposed and final regulations under
sections 6050W to address these requirements.
- Withholding
Tax and the Role of Financial Intermediaries. In 1997 the
IRS and Treasury issued regulations under the section 1441 provisions for
withholding tax on certain items of portfolio investment income from U.S. sources. The qualified intermediary (QI) system was a key element. In October 2008
the IRS issued Announcement 2008-98 concerning proposed amendments to the
qualified intermediary agreements and rules to address early notice of
failures of internal controls, evaluation of risk that foreign accounts
may be subject to control by U.S. persons, and association of a U.S. auditor to the oversight of QI performance. The IRS and Treasury intend to issue
regulations to address these various areas of compliance involving the
withholding taxes on portfolio investment income.
- Foreign
Bank Account Reporting (FBAR). In May 2009 the Treasury issued budget
proposals for Fiscal Year 2010 which included proposed legislation to
address FBAR related issues. In August 2009, the IRS and Treasury issued
Notice 2009-62 providing an extension until June 30, 2010 to file FBARs
for 2008 and earlier calendar years, pending the preparation of further
guidance. The IRS and Treasury intend to issue regulations to address
these FBAR issues.
Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) was created by Congress to charter national banks, to oversee a nationwide system of banking institutions, and to assure that national banks are safe and sound, competitive and profitable, and capable of serving in the best possible manner the banking needs of their customers.
The OCC seeks to assure a banking system in which national banks soundly manage their risks, maintain the ability to compete effectively with other providers of financial services, meet the needs of their communities for credit and financial services, comply with laws and regulations, and provide fair access to financial services and fair treatment of their customers.
Significant rules issued during fiscal year 2009 include:
Fair Credit Reporting, Accuracy and Integrity of Information Furnished to Consumer Reporting Agencies (12 CFR Part 41). The banking agencies,[1] the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a joint final rule to implement section 312 of the FACT Act. Section 312 requires the issuance of guidelines regarding the accuracy and integrity of information entities furnish to a consumer reporting agency (CRA). Section 312 also requires the issuance of regulations requiring entities that furnish information to a CRA to establish reasonable policies and procedures for the implementation of the guidelines. In addition, section 312 requires jointly prescribed regulations that identify the circumstances under which a furnisher of information to a CRA shall be required to investigate a dispute concerning the accuracy of information contained in a consumer report based on the consumer's direct request to the furnisher. A final rule was issued on July 1, 2009 (74 FR 31484).
Risk-Based Capital Guidelines; Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital Maintenance; Capital - Residential Mortgage Loans Modified Pursuant to the Home Affordable Program (12 CFR Part 3). In order to support and facilitate the timely implementation of the Home Affordable Program (Program) announced by the U.S. Department of Treasury and to promote the stability of banking organizations and the financial system, the banking agencies issued an interim final rule providing that a residential mortgage loan (whether a first-lien or a second-lien loan) modified under the Program will retain the risk weight assigned to the loan prior to the modification, so long as the loan continues to meet other relevant supervisory criteria. The rule minimizes disincentives to bank participation in the Program that could otherwise result from agencies' regulatory capital regulations. The banking agencies believe that this treatment is appropriate in light of the overall important public policy objectives of promoting sustainable loan modifications for at-risk homeowners that balance the interests of borrowers, servicers, and investors. Joint agency action is essential to ensure that the regulatory capital consequences of participation in the Program are the same for all commercial banks and thrifts. An interim final rule was issued on June 30, 2009. (74 FR 31160).
Registration
of Mortgage Loan Originators (12 CFR Part 34). The banking
agencies, the NCUA, and Farm Credit Administration (FCA) proposed amendments to
their rules to implement the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008, Title V
of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, P.L. 110-289.
These amendments require an employee of a depository institution, an employee
of a depository institution subsidiary regulated by a Federal banking agency,
or an employee of an institution regulated by the FCA that engages in the
business of a mortgage loan originator to register with the Nationwide Mortgage
Licensing System and Registry (NMLSR) and to obtain a unique identifier. These
amendments also provide that these institutions must require their employees who
act as mortgage loan originators to comply with this Act's registration and
unique identifier requirements and must adopt and follow written policies and
procedures to assure compliance with these requirements. A notice of proposed
rulemaking was issued on June 9, 2009 (74 FR 27386). The OCC has included this
rulemaking project in the Regulatory Plan (1557-AD23).
Risk-Based
Capital Guidelines -- Money Market Mutual Funds (12 CFR Part 3). On September 19,
2008, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System adopted the
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (the
"AMLF" or "ABCP Lending Facility") which enables depository institutions and
bank holding companies to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston on a
nonrecourse basis if they use the proceeds of the loan to purchase certain
asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) from money market mutual funds. The
purpose of this action was to reduce strains being experienced by money market
mutual funds. To facilitate national bank participation in the program, the
OCC adopted on September 19, 2008,[2]
on an interim final basis, an exemption from its risk-based capital guidelines
for ABCP held by a national bank as a result of its participation in this
program. The AMLF was set to expire on January 30, 2009. However, to
encourage the stability of money market mutual funds, the program has been
extended. This rule finalizes the risk-based capital exemption and extends the
risk-based capital exemption to ABCP purchased beyond the original January 30,
2009 date. This final rule applies the risk-based capital exemption to any
ABCP purchased as a result of a national bank's participation in the facility.
The risk-based capital exemption will continue to apply if the AMLF has not
expired. A final rule was issued on March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13336).
Minimum
Capital Ratios; Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital Maintenance; Capital:
Deduction of Goodwill Net of Associated Deferred Tax Liability (12 CFR Part 3). The banking agencies
issued a final rule to allow their institutions to elect to reduce the amount
of goodwill that a bank must deduct from tier 1 capital by the amount of any
deferred tax liability associated with that goodwill. This treatment is
currently permitted only in the case of goodwill acquired in a nontaxable
purchase business combination. This change effectively reduces the amount of
goodwill that a bank must deduct from tier 1 capital and reflects a bank's
maximum effective exposure to loss in the event that such goodwill is impaired
or derecognized for financial reporting purposes. A final rule was issued on
December 30, 2008 (74 FR 79602).
Standards Governing the Release of a Suspicious Activity Report (12 CFR Part 4).
The OCC proposed to revise its regulations
governing the release of non-public OCC information set forth in 12 CFR part 4,
subpart C. The proposal would clarify that the OCC's decision to release a
suspicious activity report (SAR) will be governed by the standards set forth in
proposed amendments to the OCC's SAR regulation, 12 CFR 21.11(k), that are
part of a separate, but simultaneously issued, rulemaking. A notice of
proposed rulemaking was published on March 9, 2009 (74 FR 10136).
Confidentiality
of Suspicious Activity Reports (12 CFR Part 21). The OCC proposed to
amend its regulations implementing the Bank Secrecy Act governing the
confidentiality of a suspicious activity report (SAR) to: clarify the scope of the statutory prohibition on the
disclosure by a national bank of a SAR; address the statutory prohibition on
the disclosure by the government of a SAR as that prohibition applies to the
OCC's standards governing the disclosure of SARs; clarify that the exclusive
standard applicable to the disclosure of a SAR, or any information that would
reveal the existence of a SAR, by the OCC is "to fulfill official duties
consistent with the purposes of the BSA"; and modify the safe harbor provision
in its rules to include changes made by the USA PATRIOT Act. This
proposal is based upon a similar proposal issued simultaneously by the
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). A notice of proposed rulemaking
was published on March 9, 2009 (74 FR 10130).
Community and Economic Development Entities, Community Development Projects, and Other Public Welfare Investments (12 CFR Part 24). The OCC adopted without change the interim final rule, issued on August 11, 2008, which implemented the statutory change to national banks' community development investment authority made in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA). The OCC also revised Appendix 1 to part 24, the CD-1 National Bank Community Development (Part 24) Investments Form, to make technical changes that are consistent with the HERA provision and the revised regulation. Section 2503 of the HERA revised the community development investment authority in section 24(Eleventh) to restore a national bank's authority to make investments designed primarily to promote the public welfare. A final rule was published on April 7, 2009 (74 FR 15657).
Community
Reinvestment Act Regulations (12 CFR Part 25). On August 14, 2008,
the Higher Education Opportunity Act (HEOA) was enacted into law. Section 1031
of the HEOA revised the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) to require the banking
agencies, when evaluating a bank's record of meeting community credit needs, to
consider, as a factor, low-cost education loans provided by the bank to
low-income borrowers. The banking agencies issued a proposal that would
implement section 1031 of the HEOA. In addition, the proposal would
incorporate into the banking agencies' rules statutory language that allows
them to consider as a factor when evaluating a bank's record of meeting
community credit needs capital investment, loan participation, and other
ventures undertaken by nonminority- and nonwomen-owned financial institutions
in cooperation with minority- and women-owned financial institutions and
low-income credit unions. A notice of proposed rulemaking was published on
June 30, 2009 (74 FR 31209).
The OCC's regulatory priorities for fiscal year 2010 include the following:
Risk-Based
Capital Guidelines; Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital Maintenance:
Regulatory Capital; Impact of Modifications to Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles; Consolidation of Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Programs; and Other
Related Issues (12 CFR Part 3). The banking agencies issued a notice of
proposed rulemaking to: (i) modify their general risk-based capital
standards and advanced risk-based capital adequacy frameworks to eliminate the
exclusion of certain consolidated asset-backed commercial paper programs from
risk-weighted assets; and (ii) provide a reservation of authority in their
general risk-based capital standards to permit the agencies' to require banking
organizations to treat structures that are not consolidated under accounting
standards as if they were consolidated for risk-based capital purposes
commensurate with the risk relationship of the banking organization to the
structure. The banking agencies also requested comment on the effect on
regulatory capital requirements of the consolidation of assets required by the
Financial Accounting Standard Board's (FASB) recent issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140 and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments to
FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). A notice of proposed rulemaking was
published on September 15, 2009 (74 FR 47138).
Risk-Based Capital Guidelines; Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital Maintenance: Basel II Standardized Approach (12 CFR Part 3). As part of the banking agencies' ongoing efforts to develop and refine the capital standards to enhance their risk sensitivity and ensure the safety and soundness of the banking system, they issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend various provisions of the capital rules on July 29, 2008, at 73 FR 43982. The changes involve amending the current capital rules for those banks that will not be subject to the advanced internal ratings-based approaches. Work on a final rule is underway.
Risk-Based Capital Standards: Market Risk (12 CFR Part 3). The banking agencies plan to issue a second notice of proposed rulemaking to amend the market risk capital requirements for national banks. The banking agencies issued a notice of proposed rulemaking on September 25, 2006 (71 FR 55958). The rule would make the current market risk capital requirements generally more risk sensitive with respect to the capital treatment of trading activities in banks and bank holding companies.
Interagency Proposal for Model Privacy Form under Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (12 CFR Part 40). The banking agencies, along with the NCUA, FTC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), issued a joint notice of proposed rulemaking pursuant to section 728 of the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-351) on March 29, 2007 (72 FR 14940). Specifically, a safe harbor model privacy form was proposed that financial institutions may use to provide the disclosures under the privacy rules. After further consumer testing of this model form, the SEC published for comment in the Federal Register a report analyzing this testing on April 20, 2009. 74 FR 17925. The final rule will be published in November 2009.
Office of Thrift
Supervision
As the primary
Federal regulator of the thrift industry, the Office of Thrift Supervision
(OTS) has established regulatory objectives and priorities to supervise thrift
institutions effectively and efficiently. These objectives include maintaining
and enhancing the safety and soundness of the thrift industry; a flexible,
responsive regulatory structure that enables savings associations to provide
credit and other financial services to their communities, particularly housing
mortgage credit; and a risk-focused, timely approach to supervision.
OTS, the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (FRB), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) (collectively, the banking agencies) continue to work together on
regulations where they share the responsibility to implement statutory requirements.
For example, the banking agencies are working jointly on several rules to
update capital standards to maintain and improve consistency in agency rules.
These rules implement revisions to the International Convergence of Capital
Management and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework (Basel II Framework) and
include:
- Risk-Based
Capital Guidelines: Implementation of Revised Basel Capital Accord. The final
Basel II Advanced Approaches rule was published by the banking agencies on
December 7, 2007 and became effective April 1, 2008. The OTS, in
conjunction with the other banking agencies, is working on implementing
the Advanced Approaches rule first for core banking organizations. This
is an institution-specific and multi-year process of evaluating each
organization's readiness and qualification to move forward into
transitional capital floors.
- Risk-Based
Capital Standards: Market Risk. On September 25, 2006, the Agencies
issued an NPRM on Market Risk. In this rule, OTS proposed to require savings
associations to measure and hold capital to cover their exposure to market
risk. The Agencies did not finalize the 2006 NPRM. Subsequently, the
Basel Committee directed international revisions which were completed in
July 2009. At that time the Agencies began drafting a new NPR, based upon
the international revisions as well as on the comments received in 2006.
The new NPRM should be issued in 2010.
- Risk-Based
Capital Standards: Standardized Approach. The banking
agencies issued an NPRM implementing the Standardized Approach to credit
risk and approaches to operational risk that are contained in the Basel II
Framework. 73 FR 43982 (July 29, 2008). Banking organizations would be
able to elect to adopt these proposed revisions or remain subject to the
agencies' existing risk-based capital rules, unless the banking
organization uses the Advanced Capital Adequacy Framework described
above. The comment period closed October 27, 2008 and the proposal is
still pending final action by the banking agencies.
- Risk-Based
Capital Guidelines: Impact of Modifications to Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles; Consolidation of Asset-Backed Commercial Paper
Programs.
The banking agencies are proposing to modify its general risk-based
capital standards and advanced risk-based capital adequacy framework to
eliminate the exclusion of certain consolidated asset-backed commercial
paper programs from risk-weighted assets; and permit the banking agencies
to require banking organizations to treat structures that are not
consolidated under accounting standards as if they were consolidated for
risk-based capital purposes commensurate with the risk relationship of the
banking organization to the structure. The agencies issued an NPRM on
September 15, 2009 (74 FR 47138).
Significant proposed
rules issued during fiscal year 2009 include:
S.A.F.E.
Mortgage Licensing.
On June 9, 2009, the banking agencies and the Farm Credit Administration (FCA)
issued a joint NPRM proposing to amend their rules to implement the Secure and
Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (the S.A.F.E. Act). These
amendments require an employee of a depository institution, an employee of a
depository institution subsidiary regulated by a Federal banking agency, or an
employee of an institution regulated by the FCA that engages in the business of
a mortgage loan originator to register with the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing
System and Registry and to obtain a unique identifier. These amendments also
provide that these institutions must require their employees who act as
mortgage loan originators to comply with this Act's registration and unique
identifier requirements and must adopt and follow written policies and
procedures to assure compliance with these requirements. The comment period on
this proposal closed on July 9, 2009, and comments are being reviewed in
preparation for drafting a final rule in 2010.
Significant
final rules issued during fiscal year 2009 include:
- OTS,
FRB and NCUA issued a final rule on January 29, 2009 (74 FR 5498) to
prohibit certain unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the areas of
credit cards and overdrafts and proposed clarifications to that final rule
on May 5, 2009 (84 FR 20804). The comment period closed on July 30, 2009
and, in accordance with the statute, the agencies may issue further
clarifications at a later date.
- OTS
anticipates implementing section 728 of the Financial Services Regulatory
Relief Act by amending its privacy rules under the Gramm-Leach Bliley Act
to include a safe harbor model privacy form. The banking agencies, NCUA,
FTC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (FTC), and SEC expect to issue
final amendments to their rules requiring initial and annual privacy
notices to their customers. And, pursuant to Section 728 of the Financial
Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006, the agencies are adopting a model
privacy form that financial institutions may rely on as a safe harbor to
provide disclosures under the privacy rules.
Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau
The Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) issues regulations to enforce the Federal
laws relating to alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and ammunition taxes and relating
to commerce involving alcohol beverages. TTB's mission and regulations are
designed to:
1) Regulate with regard
to the issuance of permits and authorizations to operate in the alcohol and
tobacco industries;
2) Assure the collection
of all alcohol, tobacco, and firearms and ammunition taxes, and obtain a high
level of voluntary compliance with all laws governing those industries; and
3) Suppress commercial
bribery, consumer deception, and other prohibited practices in the alcohol
beverage industry.
TTB plans to pursue
one significant regulatory action during FY 2010. In 2007, the Department
approved the publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking soliciting comments
on a proposal to require a serving facts statement on alcohol beverage labels.
The proposed statement would include information about the serving size, the
number of servings per container, and per-serving information on calories and
grams of carbohydrates, fat, and protein. The proposed rule would also require
information about alcohol content. This regulatory action was initiated under
section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, 27 U.S.C. 205(e),
which confers on the Secretary of the Treasury authority to promulgate
regulations for the labeling of alcoholic beverages, including regulations that
prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading statements on labels and
that ensure that such labels provide the consumer with adequate information as
to the identity and quality of the product. TTB received and reviewed
approximately 800 comments on the serving facts proposal and plans to put
forward for Department approval a final rule on this matter in FY 2010.
In addition to the
regulatory action described above, in FY 2010 TTB plans to give priority to the
following regulatory matters:
- Modernization of title 27, Code of
Federal Regulations. TTB will continue to pursue its multi-year program
of modernizing its regulations in title 27 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. This program involves updating and revising the regulations
to be more clear, current, and concise, with an emphasis on the
application of plain language principles. TTB laid the groundwork for this
program in 2002 when it started to recodify its regulations in order to
present them in a more logical sequence. In FY 2005, TTB evaluated all of
the 36 CFR parts in title 27 and prioritized them as "high,"
"medium," or "low" in terms of the need for complete
revision or regulation modernization. TTB determined importance based on
industry member numbers, revenue collected, and enforcement and compliance
issues identified through field audits and permit qualifications,
statutory changes, significant industry innovations, and other factors.
The 10 parts of title 27, Code of Federal Regulations, that TTB
ranked as "high" include the five parts directing operation of
the major taxpayers under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986: Part 19 -
Distilled Spirits Plants; Part 24 - Wine; Part 25 - Beer; Part 40 -
Manufacture of Tobacco Products and Cigarette Papers and Tubes; and Part
53 - Manufacturers Excise Taxes - Firearms and Ammunition. These five
parts represent nearly all the tax revenue that TTB collects, which is
expected to be approximately $22 billion in FY 2010. The remaining
five parts rated "high" consist of regulations covering imports
and exports (Part 27 - Importation of Distilled Spirits, Wine and Beer;
Part 28 - Exportation of Alcohol; and Part 41 - Exportation of Tobacco
Products and Cigarette Papers and Tubes), as well as regulations
addressing the American Viticultural Area program (Part 9) and TTB
procedures (Part 70).
To date, related to the modernization plan, TTB
has published notices of proposed rulemaking to revise Part 19 and to amend
Part 9 and has reviewed the public comments received in response to those
notices, and TTB anticipates that in FY 2010 it will forward to the Department final
rules for both parts for publication approval. In FY 2010, TTB plans to put
forward to the Department for publication approval an advance notice for
proposed rulemaking for the revision of the beer regulations in Part 25.
- Allergen Labeling. In FY 2006 TTB
published interim regulations setting forth standards for voluntary
allergen labeling of alcohol beverages. These regulatory changes
were an outgrowth of changes made to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
Act by the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of
2004. At the same time, TTB published a proposal to make those
interim requirements mandatory. In FY 2010 TTB intends to continue
its review of mandatory allergen labeling with a view to preparing a final
rule document that would take effect on the same date as the serving facts
regulatory changes discussed above.
- Multi-Region Appellations for Imported
Wine.
TTB will put forward for Departmental publication approval a proposal to
amend its wine labeling regulations to allow the labeling of imported
wines with multi-region appellations of origin. The proposed
regulatory change would provide labeling treatment for imported wines that
is similar to what is currently available for domestic wines, which may be
labeled with a multi-state or multi-county appellation of origin.
- Other wine labeling issues. In FY 2010 TTB
will continue to act on petitions for the establishment of new American
viticultural areas (AVAs) and for the modification of the boundaries of
existing AVAs. TTB also will seek Departmental publication approval of a
number of other wine labeling rulemaking documents for public comment in
FY 2010. These initiatives include a clarification of the approval
process for the use of American grape varietal names on labels and an
updating of the list of approved American grape varietal names. We also
plan regulatory action on petitions seeking to adopt new label designation
standards for wines now generally described as "wine with natural
flavors," and to limit the use of American appellations to wines produced
entirely from U.S. grapes.
- Specially Denatured and Completely
Denatured Alcohol Formulas. TTB will submit for publication
approval by the Department a proposal to reclassify some specially
denatured alcohol (SDA) formulas as completely denatured alcohol (CDA) for
which formula submission to TTB is not required. The proposed
regulatory changes would also allow other SDA formulas to be used without
the submission of article formulas. These changes would allow TTB to
shift its SDA-dedicated resources from the current front-end pre-market
formula control approach to a post-market assessment of actual compliance
with SDA regulations.
- Special (Occupational) Tax Repeal. TTB published
in FY 2009 a temporary rule, together with a contemporaneous notice of
proposed rulemaking that amended the TTB regulations in response to the
statutory repeal of the special (occupational) taxes on producers and
marketers of alcoholic beverages. In FY 2010 TTB intends to put forward
for Departmental approval a document that adopts those temporary
amendments as a final rule.
- Alternation of Brewery Premises. In FY 2010 TTB
will forward to the Department for publication approval a notice of
proposed rulemaking to amend the TTB regulations to set forth specific
standards for the approval and operation of alternating proprietorships at
the same brewery premises. The proposed regulations will include
standards for alternation agreements between host and tenant brewers as
well as rules for recordkeeping and segregation of products made by
different brewers.
- Determination of Tax on Large Cigars. TTB will
forward to the Department for publication approval a notice of proposed
rulemaking that clarifies the rules for determining the amount of tax that
is due on large cigars, which is based on their sale price. The proposed
regulatory changes will include specific standards for determining the tax
on large cigars that are provided at no cost in connection with a sale.
- Time For Payment of Tax on Alcohol
Beverages.
In FY 2010 TTB will forward to the Department for publication approval a
temporary rule, together with a contemporaneous notice of proposed
rulemaking, to reflect statutory standards for the deferred payment of
taxes on alcohol beverages in the month of September and for quarterly
payment of tax by small producers of alcohol beverages.
- Classification of Tobacco Products. In FY 2010 TTB
will continue its review of standards for the classification of different
tobacco products. In FY 2007 TTB published a notice of proposed
rulemaking to set standards for distinguishing between cigars and
cigarettes and, after a review of the public comments received in response
to that proposal, TTB determined that further review was necessary with a
view to possible publication of new proposals for further comment. In
addition, TTB will consider the possibility of proposing standards to
distinguish between pipe tobacco and roll-your-own tobacco.
CHIPRA
Tobacco Product and Processed Tobacco Implementation. In FY 2009 TTB
published two temporary rules, together with a contemporaneous notice of
proposed rulemaking in each case, to implement changes to the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 made by the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization
Act of 2009 (CHIPRA). The changes included tobacco product tax rate increases,
changes to the bases for the denial, suspension, or revocation of permits for
tobacco manufacturers and importers, permit and related requirements for
manufacturers and importers of processed tobacco, and an expansion of the
definition of roll-your-own tobacco. TTB anticipates that in FY 2010 it will
forward to the Department for publication approval final rules regarding these
two regulatory initiatives.
Bureau of the Public
Debt
The Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD) has responsibility for
borrowing the money needed to operate the Federal Government and accounting for
the resulting debt, regulating the primary and secondary Treasury securities
markets, and ensuring that reliable systems and processes are in place for
buying and transferring Treasury securities.
BPD administers regulations: (1) Governing transactions in
Government securities by Government securities brokers and dealers under the
Government Securities Act of 1986 (GSA), as amended; (2) Implementing
Treasury's borrowing authority, including rules governing the sale and issue of
savings bonds, marketable Treasury securities, and State and local Government
securities; (3) Setting out the terms and conditions by which Treasury may
redeem (buy back) outstanding, unmatured marketable Treasury securities through
debt buyback operations; (4) Governing securities held in Treasury's retail
systems; and (5) Governing the acceptability and valuation of all collateral
pledged to secure deposits of public monies and other financial interests of
the Federal Government.
Treasury's
GSA rules govern financial responsibility, the protection of customer funds and
securities, record keeping, reporting, audit, and large position reporting for
all government securities brokers and dealers, including financial
institutions.
Treasury
maintains regulations governing two retail systems for purchasing and holding
Treasury securities: Legacy Treasury Direct, in which investors can purchase,
manage, and hold marketable Treasury securities in book-entry form, and
TreasuryDirect, in which investors may purchase, manage, and hold savings
bonds, marketable Treasury securities, and certificates of indebtedness in an
Internet-based system.
During fiscal year 2010, BPD will accord priority to the following
regulatory projects:
Savings Bond Issuing and Paying Agent Regulations. BPD
plans to issue a final rule amending the savings bond issuing regulations to
equalize the fee structure between definitive and electronic bonds, and
amending the savings bond paying agent regulations to replace the EZ Direct
system with the EZ Clear system.
TreasuryDirect. BPD plans to issue a final rule
revising the TreasuryDirect regulations to support enhancements to the system,
primarily to implement a reinvestment option and to revise the purchase
process.
Marketable
Treasury bills, notes, bonds, and non-marketable savings bonds. BPD plans to amend
the regulations to remove certain evidentiary requirements for deceased owner
cases.
Financial Management
Service
The Financial Management Service (FMS) issues regulations to
improve the quality of Government financial management and to administer its
payments, collections, debt collection, and Government-wide accounting
programs. For fiscal year 2010, FMS's regulatory plan includes the following
priorities:
- Federal Government Participation in
the Automated Clearing House. FMS is proposing to amend our regulation at
31 CFR part 210 governing the use of the Automated Clearing House (ACH)
system by Federal agencies. The proposed amendments will adopt, with some
exceptions, the ACH Rules developed by NACHA - The Electronic Payments
Association (NACHA) as the rules governing the use of the ACH Network by
Federal agencies.
We are issuing this proposed rule to address changes that NACHA has made
to the ACH Rules since the publication of NACHA's 2007 ACH Rules book.
These changes include new requirements to identify all international
payment transactions using a new Standard Entry Class Code and to include
certain information in the ACH record sufficient to allow the receiving
financial institution to identity the parties to the transaction and to
allow the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) screening.
In addition, we are proposing (1) to streamline the process for reclaiming
post-death benefit payments from financial institutions; (2) to require
financial institutions to provide limited account-related customer
information related to the reclamation of post-death benefit payments as
permitted under the Payment Transactions Integrity Act of 2008; and (3) to
modify our previous guidance regarding the requirement that non-vendor
payments be delivered to a deposit account in the name of the recipient.
- Debt Collection Authorities Under the
Debt Collection Improvement Act. FMS is amending its regulation at 31
CFR part 285 governing the centralized offset of federal payments,
including tax refund payments, to collect nontax debts owed to the United States. The amendments remove the time limitation on the collection of nontax debts
by centralized offset, consistent with a change in the statute on which it
is based. The statutory change, enacted as part of the Food, Conservation
and Energy Act of 2008, allows for the use of centralized offset of
federal payments, including federal salary payments, to collect nontax
debts owed to the United States irrespective of the amount of time the
debt has been outstanding.
Domestic Finance -
Office of the Fiscal Assistant Secretary (OFAS)
The Office of the
Fiscal Assistant Secretary develops policy for and oversees the operations of
the financial infrastructure of the federal government, including payments,
collections, cash management, financing, central accounting, and delinquent
debt collection.
Anti-Garnishment. In FY 2010,
Treasury plans to promulgate a joint rule, with Federal benefit agencies, to
give better force and effect to various benefit agency statutes that exempt
Federal benefits from garnishment. Typically, upon receipt of a garnishment
order from a State court, financial institutions will completely freeze an
account as they perform due diligence in complying with the order. The joint
rule will address this practice of account freezes to ensure that benefit
recipients have access to a certain amount of lifeline funds while garnishment
orders or other legal processes are resolved or adjudicated, and will provide
financial institutions with specific administrative instructions to carry out
upon receipt of a garnishment order. The joint rule will apply to financial
institutions, but is not expected to have specific provisions for consumers,
States, debt collectors, or banking regulators. However, the banking
regulators would enforce the policy in cases of non-compliance by means of their
general authorities. This proposed regulation will be a new part in Title 31
jointly controlled by Treasury and the Federal benefit agencies.
[1]
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift
Supervision.
[2]
73 FR 55704 (September 26, 2008).