DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA)
Statement of Regulatory Priorities
In
FY 2015, USDA will focus on a number of high-priority regulations necessary to
implement the Agricultural Act of 2014 (Farm Bill). This legislation, which
was signed into law on February 7, 2014, provides authorization for services
and programs that impact every American and millions of people around the
world. The new Farm Bill builds on historic economic gains in rural America
over the past five years, while achieving meaningful reform and billions of
dollars in savings for the taxpayer. The new Farm Bill will allow USDA to
continue record accomplishments on behalf of the American people, while
providing new opportunity and creating jobs across rural America. It will
enable USDA to further expand markets for agricultural products at home and
abroad, strengthen conservation efforts, create new opportunities for local and
regional food systems and grow the biobased economy. It will provide a
dependable safety net for America's farmers, ranchers and growers. It will
maintain important agricultural research and ensure access to safe and
nutritious food for all Americans. USDA's regulatory efforts in the coming year
will modify existing regulations and introduce new regulatory actions necessary
to implement the 2014 Farm Bill and to achieve the following goals identified
in the Department's Strategic Plan for 2010-2015:
Assist rural communities to create prosperity so they are
self-sustaining, re-populating, and economically thriving. USDA
is
the leading advocate for rural America. The Department supports rural
communities and enhances quality of life for rural residents by improving their
economic opportunities, community infrastructure, environmental health, and the
sustainability of agricultural production. The common goal is to help create
thriving rural communities with good jobs where people want to live and raise
families where children have economic opportunities and a bright future.
Ensure our national forests and private working lands are
conserved, restored, and made more resilient to climate change, while enhancing
our water resources. America's prosperity is
inextricably linked to the health of our lands and natural resources. Forests,
farms, ranches, and grasslands offer enormous environmental benefits as a
source of clean air, clean and abundant water, and wildlife habitat. These
lands generate economic value by supporting the vital agriculture and forestry
sectors, attracting tourism and recreational visitors, sustaining green jobs,
and producing ecosystem services, food, fiber, timber and non-timber products.
They are also of immense social importance, enhancing rural quality of life,
sustaining scenic and culturally important landscapes, and providing
opportunities to engage in outdoor activity and reconnect with the land.
Help America promote agricultural production and
biotechnology exports as America works to increase food security. A
productive agricultural sector is critical to increasing global food security.
For many crops, a substantial portion of domestic production is bound for
overseas markets. USDA helps American farmers and ranchers use efficient and sustainable
production, biotechnology, and other emergent technologies to enhance food
security around the world and find export markets for their products.
Ensure that all of America's children have
access to safe, nutritious, and balanced meals. A
plentiful supply of safe and nutritious food is essential to the well-being of
every family and the healthy development of every child in America. USDA
provides nutrition assistance to children and low-income people who need it and
works to improve the healthy eating habits of all
Americans, especially children. In addition, the
Department safeguards the quality and wholesomeness of meat, poultry, and
processed egg products, and it addresses and
prevents loss or damage from pests and disease outbreaks.
Important
regulatory activities supporting the accomplishment of these goals in 2015 will
include the following:
Strengthening Food Safety Inspection.
USDA will continue to develop science-based regulations that improve the safety
of meat, poultry, and processed egg products in the least burdensome and most
cost-effective manner. Existing regulations will be revised to address
emerging food safety challenges, streamlined to remove excessively prescriptive
requirements, and updated to be made consistent with Hazard Analysis and Critical
Control Point principles. Among other actions, USDA will amend regulations so
that information presented on food packaging is useful in assisting consumers
with purchasing and preparation decisions. The agency will also use technology
to streamline and improve the integrity of export certificates. To help small businesses
comply with food safety regulatory requirements, FSIS will continue its
collaboration with other USDA and State partners in its small business outreach
program.
Improving
Access to Nutrition Assistance and Dietary Behaviors.
As changes are made to the nutrition assistance programs, USDA will work to
ensure access to program benefits, strengthen program integrity, improve diets
and healthy eating, and promote physical activity consistent with the national
effort to reduce obesity. In support of these activities in 2014, the Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) plans to publish a proposed rule updating meal pattern
revisions for the Child and Adult Care Food Program, as well as a proposal
to enhance the eligibility standards for SNAP retailers to increase access to
more healthful foods. FNS will continue to work to implement
rules that minimize participant and vendor fraud in its nutrition
assistance programs.
Collaborating with Producers to Conserve
Natural Resources. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) is amending the Conservation Stewardship Program
(CSP) and Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) regulations to
incorporate programmatic changes as authorized by the Farm
Bill. CSP promotes consultation at the local
level to identify priority resource concerns in geographic areas within a State.
CSP encourages producers to address environmental concerns while improving and
conserving the quality and condition of natural resources in a comprehensive
manner. EQIP provides assistance to landowners to address natural resource issues
that impact soil, water and related natural resources, including grazing lands,
wetlands, and wildlife habitat. The Farm Bill folded the former Wildlife
Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) into EQIP.
Promoting Innovation through Partnerships.
NRCS has a long history of providing science-based, technically sound, and
proven conservation practices, advice, and alternatives to America's farmers
and ranchers. Traditionally,
NRCS has worked with USDA agencies, universities, and other nongovernmental
organizations to identify and refine new cutting-edge technology through
on-farm trials and research. Using
this approach, NRCS continually reviews and revises conservation practices
based on new research or changes in technology.
Through
the Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG) component of EQIP, NRCS involves
additional partners in identifying and demonstrating new approaches for
possible NRCS adoption. CIG's
purpose is to stimulate the adoption of innovative conservation approaches and
technologies in agricultural production and leverage additional investments in
conservation. Partners assist NRCS with meeting the CIG goals of identifying
new conservation technologies and practices,
conducting demonstrations and field tests, and
integrating widely applicable technologies and practices into NRCS' toolkit of
practices and activities to help agricultural
producers better address natural resource concerns. NRCS is updating the CIG
section of the EQIP regulation to be consistent with Farm Bill
amendments.
Protecting Productive Agricultural Lands and
Wetlands. The Farm Bill
combined several NRCS easement programs, including the Wetlands Reserve Program
(WRP), the Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program (FRPP), and the Grassland
Reserve Program (GRP) into the new Agricultural Conservation Easement Program
(ACEP). ACEP will require its own regulation to replace those of the repealed
WRP, FRPP, and GRP programs. ACEP will have two components: an agricultural
land easement component under which NRCS assists eligible entities to protect
agricultural land by limiting non-agricultural land uses and a wetland reserve
easement component under which NRCS provides technical and financial assistance
directly to landowners to restore, protect and enhance wetlands through the
purchase of wetlands reserve easements. NRCS will maintain the existing
easements and contracts formed under the previous programs; however,
they will all be considered part of ACEP enrollment.
Addressing Conservation Concerns on a
Regional Level. The Farm Bill
established the Regional Conservation Partnership
Program (RCPP) to promote the implementation of conservation activities through
providing support for agreements between producers and partner groups.
Producers receive technical and financial assistance through RCPP while NRCS
and its partners help producers install and maintain conservation activities. These
projects may focus on water quality and quantity, soil erosion, wildlife
habitat, drought mitigation, flood control, and other regional priorities.
Partners include producer associations, State
or local governments, Indian tribes, non-governmental organizations, and
institutions of higher education. RCPP
projects affect multiple agricultural or nonindustrial private forest
operations on a local, regional, State, or multistate level. The Farm Bill
combined several regional conservation initiatives into this program. RCPP is
implemented through an announcement of program funding through Grants.gov;
however, NRCS is publishing updates in the CSP, EQIP and ACEP regulations to indicate
that these are covered programs through which RCPP can operate.
Establish Framework for Managing
our Nation's Forests
and Grasslands. The
Forest Service will publish proposed guidance for implementation of the 2012 Land
Management Planning Rule. This
guidance will provide the detailed monitoring, assessment,
and documentation requirements that the managers of our national forests and
grasslands require to begin revising their land management plans under the 2012
Planning Rule. Currently 70 of the 120 Forest Service's Land Management Plans
are expired and in need of revision.
Making Marketing and Regulatory Programs More
Focused. The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) plans to amend its veterinary biologics
regulations to provide for the use of a simpler, uniform label format to better
meet the needs of veterinary biologics consumers. APHIS
also plans to revise tuberculosis and brucellosis regulations to
better reflect the distribution of these diseases and thereby minimize the
impacts on livestock producers while continuing to address these livestock
diseases.
In
the area of plant health, APHIS proposes to expand
the streamlined method of considering the importation and interstate movement
of fruits and vegetables. The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
will support the organic sector by updating the National List of Allowed and
Prohibited Substances as advised by the National Organic Standards Board,
streamlining organic regulatory enforcement actions, developing organic pet
food standards, and proposing that all existing and replacement dairy animals
from which milk or milk products are intended to be sold as organic must be
managed organically from the last third of gestation.
Promoting Biobased Products.
USDA will continue to promote sustainable economic opportunities to create jobs
in rural communities through the purchase and use of biobased products through the BioPreferred® program. USDA will
finalize regulations to revise the BioPreferred®
program guidelines to continue adding designated product categories to the
preferred procurement program, including intermediates and feedstocks and
finished products made of intermediates and feedstocks. The Federal preferred
procurement and the certified label parts of the program are voluntary; both
are designed to assist biobased businesses in securing additional sales.
Retrospective Review of Existing Regulations:
Pursuant to
section 6 of Executive Order 13563 "Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review (Jan. 18, 2011), the following initiatives are identified in the
Department's Final Plan for Retrospective Analysis. The final agency plans, as well as periodic status updates for
each initiative, are available online at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/21stcenturygov/actions/21st-century-regulatory-system.
RIN
|
Title
|
Significantly Reduce Burdens on Small Businesses
|
0583-AC59
|
Prior
Labeling Approval System: Generic Label Approval
|
Yes.
|
0583-AD41
|
Electronic
Export Application and Certification Fee
|
Yes.
|
0583-AD32
|
Modernization
of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
|
Yes.
|
0570-AA76
|
Rural
Energy America Program
|
Yes.
|
0570-AA85
|
Business
and Industry Loan Guaranteed Program
|
Yes.
|
0575-AC91
|
Community
Facilities Loan and Grants
|
Yes.
|
0596-AD01
|
National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Efficiencies
|
Yes.
|
Subsequent to EO 13563 and
consistent with its goals as well as the importance of public participation, President
Obama issued Executive Order 13610 on Identifying and Reducing Regulatory
Burdens in May 2012. Executive Order 13610 directs agencies, in part, to give
priority consideration to those initiatives that will produce cost savings or significant
reductions in paperwork burdens. Accordingly, reducing the regulatory burden
on the American people and our trading partners is a priority for USDA, and we
will continually work to improve the effectiveness of our existing
regulations. As a result of our ongoing regulatory review and burden reduction
efforts, USDA has identified the following burden-reducing initiatives:
Increase Use of Generic Approval and Regulations
Consolidation. FSIS is finalizing a rule that will expand
the circumstances in which the labels of meat and poultry products will be
deemed to be generically approved by FSIS. The rule will reduce regulatory
burdens and generate a discounted Agency cost savings of $3.3 million over 10
years (discounted at 7 percent).
Implement Electronic Export Application for Meat and
Poultry Products. FSIS is finalizing a rule to provide exporters
a fee-based option for transmitting U.S. certifications to foreign importers
and governments electronically. Automating the export application and
certification process will facilitate the export of U.S. meat, poultry, and egg
products by streamlining the processes that are used while ensuring that
foreign regulatory requirements are met.
Streamline Forest Service National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Compliance. The Forest Service, in
cooperation with the Council on Environmental Quality, is promulgating
rulemaking to establish three new Categorical Exclusions for simple restoration
activities. These Categorical Exclusions will improve and streamline the NEPA
process and reduce the paperwork burden, as it applies to Forest Service
projects without reducing environmental protection.
Increase Accessibility to the Rural
Energy for America Program (REAP). Under
REAP, Rural Development provides guaranteed loans and grants to support the purchase,
construction, or retrofitting of a renewable energy system. This rulemaking
will streamline the application process for grants, lessening the burden on
the applicant. The rulemaking is expected to reduce the
information collection.
Reduced Duplication in Farm Programs. The Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services (FFAS) mission area is
reducing the paperwork burden on program participants by consolidating the
information collections required to participate in farm programs administered
by the Farm Service Agency (FSA) and the Federal crop insurance program
administered by the Risk Management Agency (RMA). As a result, producers will
be able to spend less time reporting information to USDA. Additionally, FSA
and RMA will be better able to share information, thus improving operational
efficiency. FFAS is simplifying and standardizing, to the extent practical,
acreage reporting processes, program dates, and data definitions across the
various USDA programs and agencies. FFAS is making improvements to allow
producers to use information from their farm-management and precision
agriculture systems for reporting production, planted and harvested acreage,
and other key information needed to participate in USDA programs. FFAS is also
streamlining the collection of producer information by FSA and RMA with the
agricultural production information collected by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service. These process changes allow for program data that is
common across agencies to be collected once and utilized or redistributed to
agency programs in which the producer chooses to participate. FFAS will
conduct a pilot project in spring 2015 to test the ability of FSA county
offices to receive electronic acreage reports through a third-party service
provider; the pilot will add additional States following the 2014 small
"proof-of-concept" in Illinois.
Periodic status updates for these burden-reducing initiatives can
be found online at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/21stcenturygov/actions/21st-century-regulatory-system.
In addition to regulatory review initiatives identified under Executive
Order 13563 and the paper work burden reduction initiatives identified under
the Executive Order 13610, USDA has plans to initiate the following additional
streamlining initiatives in 2015.
Simplify FSA NEPA Compliance. FSA proposed revisions to its regulations that implement NEPA
to update, improve, and clarify requirements. It also proposed new categorical exclusions and
removing obsolete provisions. FSA will revise the regulations with
any additional improvements being made based on public comments to the proposed
rule. Annual cost savings to FSA as a result of this rule could be $345,000
from conducting 314 fewer environmental assessments per year, while retaining
strong environmental protection.
Simplify Equipment Contracts for Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) Loans. RUS is proposing a rule that would result
in a new standard Equipment Contract Form for use by Telecommunications Program
borrowers. This new standardized contract would ensure that certain standards
and specifications are met, and this new form would replace the current process
that requires all construction providers to use their own resources to develop
a contract for each project.
Consolidate Community Facilities Programs
Loan and Grant Requirements. The Rural Housing Service
(RHS)
is proposing to consolidate seven of the regulations used
to service Community Facilities direct loans and grants into one streamlined
regulation. This rule will reduce the time burden on RHS staff and provide the
public with a single document that clearly outlines the requirements for
servicing Community Facilities direct loans and grants.
Update Tuberculosis and
Brucellosis Programs. Given the success USDA has
had in nearly eradicating tuberculosis and brucellosis in ruminants, APHIS will
propose rulemaking to update and consolidate its
regulations regarding these diseases to better reflect the current distribution
of these diseases and the changes in which cattle, bison, and captive cervid
are produced in the United States.
Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation under Executive Order
13609:
President Obama
issued Executive Order 13609 on promoting international regulatory cooperation
in May 2012. The Executive order charges the Regulatory Working Group, an
interagency working group chaired by the Administrator of Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), with examining appropriate strategies and best
practices for international regulatory cooperation. The Executive order
also directs agencies to identify factors that should be taken into account in
evaluating the effectiveness of regulatory approaches used by trading partners
with whom the U.S. is engaged in regulatory cooperation. At this time,
USDA is identifying international regulatory cooperation activities that are
reasonably anticipated to lead to significant regulations, while working
closely with the Administration to refine the guidelines implementing the Executive
order. Apart from international regulatory cooperation, the Department
has continued to identify regulations with international impacts, as it has
done in the past. Such regulations are those that are expected
to have international trade and investment effects or otherwise may be of
interest to our international trading partners.
USDA is diligently working
to carry out the President's Executive order mandate with regard to regulatory
cooperation as new regulations are developed. Several agencies within the
Department are also actively engaged in interagency and Departmental regulatory
cooperation initiatives being pursued as part of the U.S.-Mexico High Level
Regulatory Cooperation Council (HLRCC) and the U.S.-Canada Regulatory
Cooperation Council (RCC), as well as other fora. Specific projects are being
pursued by USDA agencies such as AMS, APHIS, and FSIS and address a variety of
regulatory oversight processes and requirements related to meat, poultry, and animal
and plant health. Projects related to electronic certification, equivalence,
meat nomenclature, and the efficient and safe flow of plants, animals and food
across our shared borders are all regulatory cooperation pursuits these
agencies are undertaking in order to secure better alignment among our
countries without compromising the high standards of safety we have in place in
the U.S. relative to food safety and public health, as well as plant and animal
health, that are so critical to American agriculture.
Major Regulatory Priorities
This
following represents summary information on prospective priority regulations as
called for in Executive Orders 12866 and 13563:
Food and Nutrition Service
Mission: FNS works to end
hunger and obesity through the administration of federal nutrition assistance
programs including WIC, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and
school meals.
Priorities: In addition to
responding to provisions of legislation authorizing and modifying Federal
nutrition assistance programs, FNS's 2015 regulatory plan
supports USDA's Strategic Goal to "ensure that all of America's children have
access to safe, nutritious and balanced meals" and its related objectives:
Increase Access to Nutritious Food.
This objective represents FNS's efforts to improve nutrition by providing
access to program benefits (food consumed at home, school
meals, commodities) and distributing State administrative funds to support
program operations. To advance this
objective, FNS plans to publish a final rule implementing the
Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010's Community Eligibility Provision, which
eliminates the burden of household applications and increases access to free
school lunches and breakfasts for children in eligible high-poverty
schools. FNS will also publish a proposed rule to codify procedures for providing
temporary SNAP benefits
during emergencies for victims of disasters.
Improve Program Integrity.
FNS also plans to publish a number of rules to
increase efficiency, reduce the burden of program operations, and
further reduce improper payments. Program integrity
provisions will continue to be strengthened in the SNAP and Child Nutrition
programs to ensure Federal taxpayer dollars are spent effectively. To support
this objective, FNS plans to publish a final rule from the 2008 Farm Bill that
increases the penalty for SNAP authorized stores that are involved in the
trafficking of Program benefits. Additionally, FNS plans to publish a proposed
rule to establish consistent, outcome-focused performance measures for the SNAP
Employment and Training Program. For Child Nutrition, FNS plans to publish a
proposed rule to strengthen oversight requirements and institution
disqualification procedures, allow the imposition of fines by USDA or State
agencies for egregious and/or repeated program violations, and address several
deficiencies identified through program audits and reviews.
Promote Healthy Diet
and Physical Activity Behaviors. This objective represents
FNS's efforts to ensure that program benefits meet appropriate standards to
effectively improve nutrition for program participants, to improve the diets of
its clients through nutrition education, and to support the national effort to
reduce obesity by promoting healthy eating and physical activity. To
implement provisions included in the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010. FNS plans to publish a
proposed rule that updates the meal patterns for the Child and Adult Care Food
Program to align them with the latest Dietary Guidelines for Americans and
final rules that establish professional standards for school food service and
State child nutrition program directors,
require schools to develop local wellness policies that promote the health of
students and address the growing problem of childhood obesity. Additionally,
FNS plans to publish a proposed rule to implement the 2014 Farm
Bill governing the eligibility of retail food
stores participating in SNAP that will improve SNAP participants' access to
healthy food options.
Food
Safety and Inspection Service
Mission: FSIS
is responsible for ensuring that meat, poultry, and processed egg products in
interstate and foreign commerce are wholesome, not adulterated, and are
properly marked, labeled, and packaged.
Priorities: FSIS
is committed to developing and issuing science-based regulations intended to
ensure that meat, poultry, and processed egg products are wholesome and not
adulterated or misbranded. FSIS regulatory actions support the objective to protect public health by ensuring that food
is safe
under USDA's goal to ensure access to safe food. To reduce the number of
foodborne illnesses and increase program efficiencies, FSIS will continue to
review its existing authorities and regulations to ensure that it can address
emerging food safety challenges, to streamline excessively prescriptive regulations,
and to revise or remove regulations that are inconsistent with the FSIS's Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) regulations. FSIS is also working
with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to improve coordination and
increase the effectiveness of inspection activities. FSIS's priority
initiatives are as follows:
Implement Inspection of Certain Fish,
Including Catfish and Catfish Products.
FSIS plans to issue a final rule to implement a new inspection system for all
fish of the order Siluriformes, as required by the 2014 Farm
Bill. The rule will define inspection
requirements for this type of fish and will take into account the conditions
under which the fish is raised and transported to a processing establishment.
Streamline Export Application Processes through the Public
Health Information System (PHIS).
To support its food safety inspection activities, FSIS is continuing to
implement PHIS, a user-friendly and Web-based system that automates many of the
Agency's business processes. PHIS also enables greater exchange of
information between FSIS and other Federal agencies, such as U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, which is involved alongside FSIS in tracking cross-border
movement of import and export shipments of meat, poultry, and processed egg
products. To facilitate the implementation of some PHIS components,
FSIS is finalizing regulations to provide for electronic export application and
certification processes.
Update Nutrition Facts Panels for Meat and
Poultry Products. FSIS will propose to
amend its regulations so that the
nutrition labeling requirements for meat and poultry products reflect recent
scientific research and dietary recommendations and to improve the presentation
of nutrition information to assist consumers in maintaining healthy dietary
practices. These revisions will be consistent with the recent changes that the
Food and Drug Administration proposed for conventional foods and will ensure
that there is consistency in how nutrition information is presented across the
food supply.
Ensure Accurate Labeling of Mechanically
Tenderized Beef. FSIS has concluded that without
proper labeling, raw or partially cooked mechanically tenderized beef products
could be mistakenly perceived by consumers to be whole, intact muscle cuts. The
fact that a cut of beef has been needle or blade-tenderized
is a characterizing feature of the product and, as such, is a
material fact likely to affect consumers' purchase decisions and
should affect their preparation of the product. FSIS has
also concluded that the addition of validated cooking instruction is required
to ensure that potential pathogens throughout the product are destroyed.
Without thorough cooking, pathogens that may have been introduced to the
interior of the product during the tenderization process may remain in the
product. The Agency will finalize regulations requiring
that raw, mechanically tenderized (needle or blade) beef
products be labeled to indicate that they are "mechanically
tenderized."
Improve the Efficiency of Product Recalls.
FSIS is developing a final rule that will amend recordkeeping regulations to
specify that all official establishments and retail stores that grind or chop
raw beef products for sale in commerce must keep records that disclose the
identity of the supplier of all source materials that they use in the
preparation of each lot of raw ground or chopped product and identify the names
of those source materials. FSIS investigators and public health officials
frequently use records kept by all levels of the food distribution chain,
including the retail level, to identify and trace back product that is the
source of the illness to the suppliers that produced the source material for
the product. Access to this information will improve FSIS's ability to conduct
timely and effective consumer foodborne illness investigations and other public
health activities throughout the stream of commerce.
Improve Compliance with the Humane Methods of Slaughter
Act.
FSIS has concluded that prohibiting the slaughter of all non-ambulatory
disabled veal calves will improve compliance with the Humane Methods of
Slaughter Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.) and will also improve the
Agency's inspection efficiency by eliminating the time that FSIS inspection program
personnel spend re-inspecting non-ambulatory disabled veal calves. FSIS plans
to propose to amend its regulations on ante-mortem inspection to remove a
provision that permits establishments to set apart and hold for treatment veal
calves that are unable to rise from a recumbent position and walk because they
are tired or cold (9 CFR 309.13(b)). Under the proposed rule, non-ambulatory
disabled veal calves that are offered for slaughter will be condemned and
promptly euthanized.
FSIS Small Business Implications.
The great majority of businesses regulated by FSIS are small businesses. FSIS
conducts a small business outreach program that provides critical training,
access to food safety experts, and information resources, such as compliance
guidance and questions and answers on various topics, in forms that are
uniform, easily comprehended, and consistent. FSIS collaborates in this effort
with other USDA agencies and cooperating State partners. For example, FSIS
makes plant owners and operators aware of loan programs available through
USDA's Rural Business and Cooperative programs to help them in upgrading their
facilities. FSIS employees will meet with small and very small plant operators
to learn more about their specific needs and explore how FSIS can tailor
regulations to better meet the needs of small and very small establishments,
while maintaining the highest level of food safety.
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service
Mission: A major part of the mission of APHIS is to protect the
health and value of American agricultural and natural resources. APHIS conducts programs to prevent the introduction of
exotic pests and diseases into the United States and conducts surveillance,
monitoring, control, and eradication programs for pests and diseases in this
country. These activities enhance agricultural productivity and competitiveness
and contribute to the national economy and the public health. APHIS also
conducts programs to ensure the humane handling, care, treatment, and
transportation of animals under the Animal Welfare Act.
Priorities: APHIS continues to pursue initiatives to update its regulations
to make them more flexible and performance-based. For example, in the area of
animal health, APHIS is preparing a final rule to amend its veterinary
biologics regulations to provide for the use of a simpler, uniform label format
that would allow biologics licensees and permittees to more clearly communicate
product performance information to the end user. In addition, the rule would simplify
the evaluation of efficacy studies and reduce the amount of time required by
APHIS to evaluate study data, thus allowing manufacturers to market their
products sooner. APHIS has also prepared a proposed rule that would revise and
consolidate its regulations regarding bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis to
better reflect the distribution of these diseases and the current nature of
cattle, bison, and captive cervid production in the United States. In the area
of plant health, APHIS has prepared a proposed rule that would establish
performance standards and a notice-based process for approving the interstate
movement of fruits and vegetables from Hawaii and the U.S. Territories and the
importation of those articles from other countries. In addition, APHIS will
revise agricultural quarantine and inspection user fees so that fees collected
are commensurate with the cost of providing the activity.
Agricultural
Marketing Service
Mission: AMS's
mission is to facilitate the competitive and
efficient marketing of agricultural products. AMS
provides
marketing services to producers, manufacturers, distributors, importers,
exporters, and consumers of food products. AMS also manages the government's
food purchases, supervises food quality grading, maintains food quality
standards, supervises the Federal research and promotion programs, and oversees
the country of origin labeling program as well as the National Organic Program
(NOP).
Priorities: AMS intends to
support the government's initiative to streamline regulatory actions by
establishing a process to communicate fees for our voluntary user fee programs
annually through publication of a Federal Register notice. AMS is also committed to ensuring the integrity of
USDA organic products in the U.S. and throughout the world. In addition to its
ongoing work to develop organic pet food, apiculture, and aquaculture
standards, the Agency is moving forward with the following priority rulemakings
that affect the organic industry:
Research and Promotion Programs Organic Exemption.
USDA intends to implement the 2014 Farm Bill provision to expand the organic
exemption for research and promotion program assessments. This action would
exempt organic operations with "100 percent organic" and "organic" products,
including certain split operations, from paying research and promotion program
assessments.
Transitioning Dairy Animals into Organic Production.
Members of the organic community, including dairy producers, organic interest
groups, and the National Organic Standards Board have advocated for rulemaking
on the allowance for transitioning dairy animals into organic production.
Stakeholders have interpreted the current standard differently, creating
inconsistencies across dairy producers. AMS has submitted a proposed rule for
clearance on this issue. This proposed change to the organic standards is
intended to level the playing field for organic dairy producers.
Farm
Service Agency
Mission:
FSA's mission is to deliver timely, effective programs and services to America's
farmers and ranchers to support them in sustaining our Nation's vibrant
agricultural economy, as well as to provide first-rate support for domestic and
international food aid efforts. FSA has successfully expedited the
implementation of several major regulatory priorities resulting from the 2014
Farm Bill, including new programs such as the Agriculture Risk Coverage Program,
Price Loss Coverage Program, Margin Protection Program for Dairy, Dairy Product
Donation Program, Cotton Transition Assistance Program, and improvements to
existing programs such as disaster assistance programs, entity eligibility for
Farm Loan Programs, and Microloans. FSA supports USDA's strategic goals by stabilizing
farm income, providing credit to new or existing farmers and ranchers who are
temporarily unable to obtain credit from commercial sources, and helping farm
operations recover from the effects of disaster. FSA administers several
conservation programs directed toward agricultural producers. The largest
program is the Conservation Reserve Program, which protects up to 32 million
acres of environmentally sensitive land.
Priorities:
FSA is focused on continuing to implement the 2014 Farm Bill while providing
the best possible service to producers while protecting the environment by
updating and streamlining environmental compliance. FSA's priority initiatives
are as follows:
Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP). FSA will revise its NAP regulations
to implement the 2014 Farm Bill changes. The 2014 Farm Bill changes include
enhanced protection under NAP, which is also known as NAP buy-up to allow producers to buy
additional NAP coverage for an additional premium; revised NAP eligibility requirements for coverage on tilled native
sod; added coverage for sweet sorghum and biomass sorghum; service fee waivers
for beginning and socially disadvantaged farmers.
Conservation Compliance. FSA, working in coordination
with NRCS and RMA, will revise the USDA conservation compliance regulations to
implement the 2014 Farm Bill changes. The 2014 Farm Bill changes linking
eligibility for any premium subsidy paid by FCIC on a policy or plan of
federally reinsured crop insurance to be in compliance with Highly Erodible
Land Conservation and Wetlands Conservation provisions. Since enactment of the
1985 Farm Bill, eligibility for most commodity, disaster, and conservation
programs has been linked to compliance with the Highly Erodible Land Conservation
and Wetland Conservation provisions. The 2014 Farm Bill continues the
requirement that producers adhere to conservation compliance guidelines to be
eligible for most programs administered by FSA and NRCS.
Marketing Assistance Loans (MAL) and Loan Deficiency
Payments (LDP). FSA will revise its MAL and LDP regulations to implement the
2014 Farm Bill changes. The 2014 Farm Bill changes reauthorize
MAL and LDP for all eligible commodities including cotton, honey, and sugar
loans, for the 2014 through 2018 crop years. The MAL and LDP Programs allow
producers to receive short-term loans against their crops so that producers can
market their crops at a time that is convenient for them, rather than being
forced to sell immediately after harvest to pay the bills. The MAL and LDP
programs are continued with no changes to the loan rates except for cotton, and
there are no other changes to the basic structure of the programs. The changes
extend the program years and add clarity to the regulations. MALs, LDPs and
sugar loans are Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) programs administered by the
Farm Service Agency (FSA).
Farm Loan Programs (FLP) changes. FSA will revise its FLP regulations
to implement the 2014 Farm Bill changes. The 2014 Farm Bill changes include
expanding lending opportunities for thousands of farmers and ranchers to begin
and continue operations, including greater flexibility in determining
eligibility, raising loan limits, and emphasizing beginning and socially
disadvantaged producers. Specific changes include: eliminating loan term
limits for guaranteed operating loans, modifying the definition of beginning
farmers, allowing debt forgiveness on youth loans, increasing the guaranteed
amount on conservation loans from 75 to 80 percent and 90 percent for beginning
farmers and socially disadvantaged producers, changing the interest rate on
Direct Farm Ownership loans that are made in conjunction with other lenders,
and increasing the maximum loan amount for the down payment loan program from
$225,000 to $300,000.
Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP). FSA will revise its BCAP regulations
to implement the 2014 Farm Bill changes. The 2014 Farm Bill changes include extending
BCAP through 2018 and revising BCAP to add some new payment amounts and
eligibility restrictions. Specific changes include: revising eligible
materials to remove bagasse, add materials used for research material, and
require that all woody biomass be harvested directly from the land and reducing
the payment for collection, harvest, storage, and transportation matching
payments to $20 per dry ton. BCAP provides financial assistance to producers
who establish and harvest biomass crops and requires at least 10 percent of
payments to be matching payments.
Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). FSA will revise its CRP regulations
to implement the 2014 Farm Bill changes. The 2014 Farm Bill changes include
extending the authority to enroll acreage in CRP through September 30, 2018,
and requiring enrollment to be no more than 24 million acres beginning October
1, 2016. There are 25.6 million acres enrolled in CRP, of which 2 million expired
on September 30, 2014.
Streamline Environmental Compliance (NEPA). FSA will revise its
regulations that implement NEPA. The changes improve the efficiency,
transparency, and consistency of NEPA implementation. Changes include aligning
the regulations to NEPA regulations and guidance from the President's Council
on Environmental Quality, providing a single set of regulations that reflect
the Agency's current structure, clarifying the types of actions that require an
Environmental Assessment (EA), and adding to the list of actions that are
categorically excluded from further environmental review because they have no
significant effect on the human environment. FSA will develop any additional
changes resulting from public comments to the proposed rule.
Forest Service
Mission: FS's mission is to sustain the health, productivity, and
diversity of the Nation's forests and rangelands to meet the needs of present
and future generations. This includes protecting and managing National Forest
System lands; providing technical and financial assistance to States,
communities, and private forest landowners, plus developing and providing
scientific and technical assistance; and the exchange of scientific
information to support international forest and range conservation. FS regulatory priorities support the Department's goal to
ensure our National forests are conserved, restored, and made more resilient to
climate change, while enhancing our water resources.
Priorities: FS is
committed to developing and issuing science-based regulations intended to
ensure public participation in the management of our Nation's national forests
and grasslands, while also moving forward the Agency's ability to plan and
conduct restoration projects on National Forest System lands. FS will continue
to review its existing authorities and regulations to ensure that it can
address emerging challenges, to streamline excessively burdensome business
practices, and to revise or remove regulations that are inconsistent with the
USDA's vision for restoring the health and function of the lands it is charged
with managing. FS's priority initiatives are as follows:
Implement Land Management Planning Framework. The Forest Service
promulgated a new Land Management Planning Rule at 36 CFR part 219 in April
2012 that sets out the requirements for developing, amending, and revising land
management plans for units of the National Forest System. The planning
directives, once finalized, will be used to implement the planning framework
which fosters collaboration with the public during land management planning, is
science-based and responsive to change and promotes social, economic, and
ecological sustainability.
Strengthen Ecological Restoration Policies. This
policy would recognize the adaptive capacity of ecosystems and includes the
role of natural disturbances and uncertainty related to climate and other
environmental change. The need for ecological restoration of National Forest
System lands is widely recognized, and the Forest Service has conducted
restoration-related activities across many programs for decades. "Restoration"
is a common way of describing much of the Agency's work, and the concept is
threaded throughout existing authorities, program directives, and collaborative
efforts such as the National Fire Plan, a 10-Year comprehensive strategy and implementation
plan, and the Healthy Forests Restoration Act. However, the Agency did not
have a definition of "restoration" established in policy. The lack of a
definition was identified as a barrier to collaborating with the public and
partners to plan and accomplish restoration work.
Rural
Development
Mission:
Rural Development (RD) promotes a dynamic business environment in rural America
that creates jobs, community infrastructure, and housing opportunities in
partnership with the private sector and community-based organizations by
providing financial assistance and business planning services and supporting
projects that create or preserve quality jobs, advance energy efficiency and
the bioeconomy, and strengthen local and regional food systems while focusing
on the development of single- and multi-family housing and community
infrastructure. RD financial resources are often leveraged with those of other
public and private credit source lenders to meet business and credit needs in
under-served areas. Recipients of these programs may include individuals,
corporations, partnerships, cooperatives, public bodies, nonprofit
corporations, Indian tribes, and private companies.
Priorities:
RD
regulatory priorities will facilitate sustainable renewable energy development
and enhance the opportunities necessary for rural families to thrive
economically. RD's rules will minimize program complexity and the related
burden on the public while enhancing program delivery and Rural Business-Cooperative
Service oversight.
Increase Accessibility to the Rural
Energy for America Program (REAP). Under
REAP, Rural Development provides guaranteed loans and grants to support the
purchase, construction, or retrofitting of a renewable energy system. This
rulemaking will streamline the application process for grants, lessening the
burden to the customer. The rulemaking is expected to reduce the information
collection. REAP will also be revised to ensure a larger number of
applicants will be made available through the issuing of smaller grants. As a
result, funding will be distributed evenly across the applicant pool and
encourage greater development of renewable energy.
Broadband Access Loans. Increasing access
to broadband service is a critical factor in improving the quality of life in
rural America and in providing the foundation needed for creating jobs. The A
2014 Farm Bill revises program provisions particularly with regard to broadband
speed and application priority. Revised regulations for the Broadband Access
Loan Program are anticipated to be published in the Federal Register in
the spring of 2015.
Modify review of Single Family Housing Direct Loans. RD
will publish the certified loan packager regulation to streamline
oversight of the agency's vast network of committed Agency-certified packagers.
This action will help low- and very low-income people become homeowners. It
will also reduce the burden on program staff, enabling them to focus on
implementation and delivery, and will ensure specialized support is available
to them to complete the application for assistance, improving the quality of
loan application packages.
Departmental Management
Mission:
Departmental Management's mission is to provide management leadership to ensure
that USDA administrative programs, policies, advice and counsel meet the needs
of USDA programs, consistent with laws and mandates, and provide safe and
efficient facilities and services to customers.
Priorities:
Promote Biobased Products:
In support of the Department's goal to increase prosperity in rural areas,
USDA's Departmental Management plans to publish regulations to implement the
requirement in the Agricultural Act of 2014 (Farm Bill) to establish
eligibility criteria for forest and other traditional biobased products in the BioPreferred®
program.
Aggregate Costs and Benefits
USDA will ensure that its
regulations provide benefits that exceed costs, but are unable to provide an
estimate of the aggregated impacts of its regulations. Problems with
aggregation arise due to differing baselines, data gaps, and inconsistencies in
methodology and the type of regulatory costs and benefits considered. Some
benefits and costs associated with rules listed in the regulatory plan cannot
currently be quantified as the rules are still being formulated. For 2015,
USDA's focus will be to implement the changes to programs in such a way as to
provide benefits while minimizing program complexity and regulatory burden for
program participants.