Medical Director, Division of Transplantation

0906-AB02 201610 The Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions 0906 Health Resources and Services Administration HRSA 0900 Department of Health and Human Services HHS Definition of Human Organ Under Section 301 of the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984

This final rule clarifies that peripheral blood stem cells are included in the definition of bone marrow under section 301 of the National Organ Transplantation Act of 1984, as amended and codified in 42 U.S.C. 274e.

]]> Other Significant Previously Published in The Unified Agenda Final Rule Stage No No Not Yet Determined Pub. L. 109-129 Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005, as amended in 2010 by Pub. L. 111-264 Statutory Final 12/18/2016 Congressional deadline On December 18, 2015, Public Law 114-104 was enacted and required the Secretary to issue a determination no later than December 18, 2016, as to whether peripheral blood stem cells and umbilical cord blood are "human organs" subject to NOTA section 301. Yes

There are currently two methods to collect hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from a donor: bone marrow aspiration, and apheresis following a drug regimen. In the second category, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors are administered over 4-5 days to stimulate the donor to produce and release HSCs from the bone marrow into the peripheral (circulating) blood, where they are collected by apheresis in one or two sessions for a total of 8 hours.
A panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that HSCs collected from peripheral blood are not human organs subject to the prohibition against transfer for valuable consideration established in section 301 of the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984 (NOTA).

Should donors begin to be compensated, that decision creates the potential for disparate compensation practices for HSCs collected by bone marrow aspiration and HSCs collected from peripheral blood. The disparity could lead to fewer donations of HSCs by bone marrow aspiration, despite clear clinical preferences for such HSCs for certain patients and conditions. It could also lead to a foreclosure of access to international donor registries, which continue to provide matched donors for patients in the United States.

]]>

In 2011, a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that HSCs from peripheral blood are not bone marrow under the prohibition in NOTA section 301. Under this ruling, the transfer of HSCs in bone marrow would be subject to the prohibition in NOTA section 301, while HSCs obtained by mobilizing the donor to release HSCs from the bone marrow into the blood stream so that they may be recovered within days from the donor’s peripheral blood would not be subject to the prohibition. The court further observed that, although NOTA section 301 authorized the Secretary to issue a regulation identifying additional human organs subject to that provision, HHS had not yet exercised its authority to identify peripheral blood stem cells as section 301 authorizes. Flynn v. Holder , 684 F.3d 852 (9th Cir. 2012). On December 18, 2015, Public Law 114-104 was enacted, which required the Secretary to issue a determination as to whether peripheral blood stem cells and umbilical cord blood are human organs subject to NOTA section 301 no later than December 18, 2016.

]]> ]]>

This proposed rule is not expected to have significant cost implications.

]]>

Although the registry for HSC donors administered under statute as the C.W. Bill Young Cell Transplantation Program has continued to advise registrants that they will not be compensated for registering or donating their HSCs, compensation may become more common if we do not complete this rulemaking. The implementation of payment for donors of peripheral blood stem cells could adversely affect the safety of donors who may proceed with donation even when they have concerns about the risks, as well as the safety of patients, if the lure of compensation leads donors to hide information about their communicable disease risks. In addition, it may make donors less willing to donate HSCs by bone marrow aspiration, if by doing so they would forego compensation for donating of peripheral blood stem cells. It could also foreclose access to international donors. Such access is currently provided by reciprocal agreements with foreign registries, which require that donors of HSCs be uncompensated volunteers.

In addition, disapproval of this action would mean that HHS would not meet the December 18, 2016, deadline Congress set for completion. As drafted, the proposed rule elicited a few comments about the inclusion of umbilical cord blood within the scope of the proposed rule. On December 18, 2015, Public Law 114-104 was enacted, which required the Secretary to issue a determination as to whether peripheral blood stem cells and umbilical cord blood are human organs subject to NOTA section 301 no later than December 18, 2016.

]]> NPRM 10/02/2013 78 FR 60810 NPRM Comment Period End 12/02/2013 Final Rule 11/00/2016 No No Undetermined No No No No James Bowman Dr. Medical Director, Division of Transplantation 0906 Health Resources and Services Administration HRSA 301 443-4861 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 12C-06, Rockville MD 20857