1652-AA67 201410 The Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions 1652 Transportation Security Administration TSA 1600 Department of Homeland Security DHS Passenger Screening Using Advanced Imaging Technology Economically Significant Previously Published in The Unified Agenda Final Rule Stage Yes No 49 CFR 1540.107 49 USC 44925 Yes

TSA is issuing this rulemaking to respond to the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in EPIC v. DHS 653 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

]]>

In its decision in EPIC v. DHS 653 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2011), the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found that TSA failed to justify its failure to conduct notice and comment rulemaking and remanded to TSA for further proceedings.

]]>

As alternatives to the preferred regulatory proposal presented in the NPRM, TSA examined three other options. These alternatives include a continuation of the screening environment prior to 2008 (no action), increased use of physical pat-down searches that supplements primary screening with walk through metal detectors (WTMDs), and increased use of explosive trace detection (ETD) screening that supplements primary screening with WTMDs. These alternatives, and the reasons why TSA rejected them in favor of the proposed rule, are discussed in detail in chapter 3 of the AIT NPRM regulatory evaluation.

]]>

TSA reports that the net cost of AIT deployment from 2008–2011 has been $841.2 million (undiscounted) and that TSA has borne over 99 percent of all costs related to AIT deployment. TSA projects that from 2012–2015 net AIT related costs will be approximately $1.5 billion (undiscounted), $1.4 billion at a three percent discount rate, and $1.3 billion at a seven percent discount rate. During 2012–2015, TSA estimates it will also incur over 98 percent of AIT-related costs with equipment and personnel costs being the largest categories of expenditures. The operations described in this rule produce benefits by reducing security risks through the deployment of AIT that is capable of detecting both metallic and non-metallic weapons and explosives. Terrorists continue to test security measures in an attempt to find and exploit vulnerabilities. The threat to aviation security has evolved to include the use of non-metallic explosives. AIT is a proven technology based on laboratory testing and field experience and is an essential component of TSA's security screening because it provides the best opportunity to detect metallic and nonmetallic anomalies concealed under clothing.  More information about costs and benefits can be found in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

]]>

DHS aims to prevent terrorist attacks and to reduce the vulnerability of the United States to terrorism. By screening passengers with AIT, TSA will reduce the risk that a terrorist will smuggle a non-metallic threat on board an aircraft.

]]> NPRM 03/26/2013 78 FR 18287 NPRM Comment Period End 06/24/2013 Final Rule 07/00/2015 No No None No No www.regulations.gov No No Chawanna Carrington Project Manager, Passenger Screening Program 1652 Transportation Security Administration TSA 571 227-2958 571 227-1931 chawanna.carrington@tsa.dhs.gov Office of Security Capabilities, 601 South 12th Street, Arlington VA 20598-6016 Monica Grasso Ph.D. Manager, Economic Analysis Branch-Cross Modal Division 1652 Transportation Security Administration TSA 571 227-3329 monica.grasso@tsa.dhs.gov Office of Security Policy and Industry Engagement, 601 South 12th Street, Arlington VA 20598-6028 Linda Kent L. Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations and Security Standards 1652 Transportation Security Administration TSA 571 227-2675 571 227-1381 linda.kent@tsa.dhs.gov Office of the Chief Counsel, 601 South 12th Street, Arlington VA 20598-6002