View Rule
View EO 12866 Meetings | Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML |
DOL/ESA | RIN: 1215-AA14 | Publication ID: Spring 1997 |
Title: Defining and Delimiting the Term "Any Employee Employed in a Bona Fide Executive, Administrative, or Professional Capacity" (ESA/W-H) | |
Abstract: These regulations set forth the criteria for exemption from the Fair Labor Standards Act's minimum wage and overtime requirements for "executive," "administrative," "professional" and "outside sales employees." To be exempt, employees must meet certain tests relating to duties and responsibilities and be paid on a salary basis at specified levels. A final rule increasing the salary test levels was published on January 13, 1981 (46 FR 3010), to become effective on February 13, 1981, but was indefinitely stayed on February 12, 1981 (46 FR 11972). On March 27, 1981, a proposal to suspend the final rule indefinitely was published (46 FR 18998), with comments due by April 28, 1981. As a result of numerous comments and petitions from industry groups on the duties and responsibilities tests, and as a result of recent case law developments, the Department concluded that a more comprehensive review of these regulations was needed. An ANPRM reopening the comment period and broadening the scope of review to include all aspects of the regulations was published on November 19, 1985, with the comment period subsequently extended to March 22, 1986. ^PThe Department has revised these regulations since the ANPRM to address specific issues. In 1991, as the result of an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the regulations were revised to permit certain computer systems analysts, computer programmers, software engineers, and other similarly skilled professional employees to qualify for the exemption, including those paid on an hourly basis if their rates of pay exceed 6-1/2 times the applicable minimum wage. Also, in 1992 the Department issued a final rule which provided, in part, that an otherwise exempt public sector employee would not be disqualified from the exemption's requirement for payment on a "salary basis" solely because the employee is paid according to a public pay and leave system that, absent the use of paid leave, requires the employee's pay to be reduced for absences of less than one workday. In addition, a number of court rulings have caused confusion on the factors to consider in meeting the regulation's "salary basis" criteria, in both the public and private sectors. | |
Agency: Department of Labor(DOL) | Priority: Economically Significant |
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda | Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Stage |
Major: Yes | Unfunded Mandates: State, local, or tribal governments; Private Sector |
CFR Citation: 29 CFR 541 | |
Legal Authority: 29 USC 213(a)(1) |
Timetable:
|
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes | Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State |
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions, Organizations | |
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes | |
Agency Contact: John R. Fraser Deputy Administrator (WHD) Department of Labor Employment Standards Administration Room S3502, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, Washington, DC 20210 Phone:202 693-0051 Fax:202 693-1432 |