View Rule

View EO 12866 Meetings Printer-Friendly Version     Download RIN Data in XML

HUD/HUDSEC RIN: 2501-AB57 Publication ID: Fall 1998 
Title: Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention in Certain Residential Structures (FR-3482) 
Abstract: The Office of Lead Hazard Control was established by Congress within the Office of the Secretary of HUD. The Office provides overall direction to HUD's lead-based paint activities. ^PCurrently, 24 CFR part 35 addresses the Department's requirements on lead hazards in housing. Additional requirements are specified for each housing program in the CFR part pertaining to each program. Sections 1012 and 1013 of the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, which is title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (title X) require substantial revisions to HUD's current regulations for the evaluation and control of lead-based paint hazards in federally assisted and federally owned housing. The legislation evidences a concern with developing a national strategy to build the infrastructure necessary to eliminate lead-based paint hazards in all pre-1978 housing that may be occupied by young children. Because of the scope of the problem, the strategy will be implemented on a priority basis and, in part, is to be based on guidelines issued by the Department on August 25, 1995, on the conduct of federally supported work involving risk assessments inspections, interim controls and abatement of lead-based paint hazards ("Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing"). The revisions required by title X will affect HUD's housing programs and the housing programs of other Federal agencies. ^PHUD is consolidating in a revised part 35 of title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations the multitude of lead-based paint regulations found throughout HUD programs and will make them consistent, creating a single point of reference for the Department's lead-based paint requirements. Proposed regulations were published for public comment on June 7, 1996. 
Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)  Priority: Economically Significant 
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Stage 
Major: No  Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined 
CFR Citation: 24 CFR 35   
Legal Authority: 42 USC 4822    42 USC 3535(d)   
Legal Deadline:
Action Source Description Date
Final  Statutory    01/01/1995 

Statement of Need: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the National Academy of Sciences have labeled lead poisoning as the leading environmental health hazard facing America's children. Childhood lead exposure has been shown to cause damage to the brain and nervous system which causes behavior and learning problems; reduced IQ; slowed growth; hearing problems; hypertension and heart disease; reproductive problems for both men and women; kidney damage; and many other adverse health effects, in some cases even seizures coma, and death. These effects result in increased medical care costs, increased special education costs, and decreased lifetime earnings. The reductions in IQ appear to be irreversible, and because lead is stored primarily in bone, internal exposures can occur for decades, even if environmental exposures are controlled. ^PThe results of CDC's third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey indicate that population blood lead levels have continued to decrease dramatically as a result of the de-leading of gasoline and the elimination of lead in solder in food canning, as well as the ban on lead in household paint (which was effective in 1978). Nevertheless, CDC found that during the period 1991-1994, 4.4 percent of all American children aged 1-5, or 930,000 children, had blood lead levels greater than the CDC level of concern (10 ug/dl). CDC has concluded that the most serious remaining sources of lead exposure are lead in deteriorated paint in older housing and dust and soil contaminated by paint and residues from past emissions of leaded gasoline. These sources must be controlled to assure continued declines in childhood lead poisoning. ^PThe prevalence of elevated blood lead levels is statistically associated with low family income, older housing, and African-American or Mexican-American race/ethnicity. For instance, approximately 8.6 percent of children aged 1-5 living in housing built before 1946 had elevated blood lead levels during the 1991-1994 period, compared to 4.4 percent for all children of that age. For children in low income families living in pre-1946 housing, the percentage was 16.4; and among non-Hispanic black children living in pre-1946 housing, the percentage was 21.9.

Summary of the Legal Basis: Title X amends the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 USC 4822) to focus attention and resources on identifying and controlling lead-based paint hazards in federally assisted and federally owned housing before children are poisoned.

Alternatives: The statute is generally prescriptive in requiring regulatory action to be taken by HUD. For certain HUD programs the Department has some discretion in the level of hazard evaluation and control measures to be undertaken. Alternatives being considered are related primarily to: (1) the amount of on-site work that is required for hazard evaluation and control; (2) targeting by year of construction; and (3) likelihood of occupancy by families with children.

Anticipated Costs and Benefits: The Department has estimated the present value of some of the major benefits of protecting children from lead exposure that would flow from first-year activities required under the regulations proposed on June 7, 1996. These quantified benefits included increased lifetime earnings associated with higher IQs for children with lower blood lead levels, and avoided costs of special education and medical treatment. Estimated benefits also included market-value increases resulting from housing renovation associated with lead-based paint hazard controls. Using a three percent discount rate for lifetime earnings, total estimated benefits were approximately $1.5 billion; using a seven percent rate, the estimate was approximately $500 million. Costs of activities that would be newly required in the first year of the proposed regulations were estimated at approximately $460 million, for a net benefit of over $1 billion using a three percent discount rate and $40 million using seven percent. ^PAdditional possible benefits not included in these estimates are: reduced infant mortality; reduced hypertension; improvements to children's stature, hearing and vitamin D metabolism; reductions in juvenile delinquency and the burden on the educational system; avoidance of the parental and family time expense and emotional costs of caring for poisoned children; and reductions in personal injury claims and court cases. ^PThis analysis may be modified for the final rule.

Risks: Without the regulatory changes required by title X, childhood lead exposures will continue at or near current levels.

Timetable:
Action Date FR Cite
NPRM  06/07/1996  61 FR 29170   
NPRM Comment Period End  09/05/1996    
Final Action  01/00/1999    
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No  Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State 
Small Entities Affected: No 
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes 
Agency Contact:
David E. Jacobs
Director, Office of Lead Hazard Control
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of the Secretary
Phone:202 755-1785