View Rule

View EO 12866 Meetings Printer-Friendly Version     Download RIN Data in XML

DOL/OSHA RIN: 1218-AB82 Publication ID: Spring 2002 
Title: Update and Revision of the Exit Routes Standard 
Abstract: Many Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards were adopted under section 6(a) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act; 29 U.S.C. 655(a)). This section of the OSH Act authorized the Agency, in its first 2 years of existence, to adopt national consensus standards without prior notice and comment. The versions of the consensus standards OSHA adopted are now typically well over 30 years old and have been superseded by newer ones. In addition, many of these old standards were written in technical jargon and were hard for many employers and employees to understand. To address these problems, OSHA is undertaking a consensus standards initiative to revise OSHA's exit routes (also known as means of egress) standard. The revisions will rewrite the standard in simple, easy-to-understand language that will be easier for employers and employees to follow. 
Agency: Department of Labor(DOL)  Priority: Other Significant 
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Stage 
Major: No  Unfunded Mandates: No 
EO 13771 Designation: uncollected 
CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1910.35    29 CFR 1910.36    29 CFR 1910.37    29 CFR 1910.38   
Legal Authority: 29 USC 655(b)    5 USC 353   
Legal Deadline:  None

Statement of Need: The standard being revised in this initiative is one of OSHA's oldest and most difficult to understand. The Agency has identified the exit routes standard as a standard in need of revision because it is out of date and unnecessarily complex, and stakeholders have recommended that the standard be updated quickly. OSHA also believes that revising the standard will lead to better voluntary compliance and fewer disputes about violations. With OSHA's limited resources, any effort that can substantially increase opportunities for compliance without sacrificing employee safety and health protection will have long-term benefits.

Summary of the Legal Basis: The legal basis for the final rule will be a finding that, by making these OSHA standards easier to understand and comply with, the Agency will increase compliance and reduce work-related injuries and deaths.

Alternatives: The alternative considered - leaving the outdated standard on the books - has been rejected because doing so would not encourage compliance or enhance safety.

Anticipated Costs and Benefits: The final standard for exit routes will have no economic impacts because this revision will not increase employers' obligations or reduce employee protections.

Risks: Employees can be injured or killed if they are not able to exit an area safely when a fire or other emergency occurs.

Timetable:
Action Date FR Cite
NPRM  09/10/1996  61 FR 47712   
Public Hearing  04/29/1997  62 FR 9402   
Final Rule  09/00/2002    
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No  Government Levels Affected: None 
Federalism: No 
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes 
Agency Contact:
Steven F. Witt
Director, Directorate of Cooperative and State Programs
Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room N-3700, FP Building,
Washington, DC 20210
Phone:202 693-2200
Fax:202 693-1671
Email: witt.steven@dol.gov