View Rule

View EO 12866 Meetings Printer-Friendly Version     Download RIN Data in XML

DHS/USCG RIN: 1625-AA99 Publication ID: Fall 2007 
Title: Vessel Requirements for Notices of Arrival and Departure, and Automatic Identification System (USCG-2005-21869) 
Abstract: This rulemaking would expand the applicability for Notice of Arrival and Departure (NOAD) and Automatic Identification System (AIS) requirements. These expanded requirements would better enable the Coast Guard to correlate vessel AIS data with NOAD data, enhance our ability to identify and track vessels, detect anomalies, improve navigation safety, and heighten our overall maritime domain awareness. The NOAD portion of this rulemaking would expand the applicability of the NOAD regulations by changing the minimum size of vessels covered below the current 300 gross tons, require that a notice of departure be submitted for all vessels required to submit a notice of arrival, and mandate electronic submission of NOAD notices to the National Vessel Movement Center. The AIS portion of this rulemaking will expand current AIS carriage requirements for the population identified in the Marine Transportation Security Act of 2002. Market or Regulatory Failure Analysis: The NOAD and AIS portions of the NPRM would attempt to close regulatory gaps by having smaller vessels submit NODs as well as NOAs and to do this electronically. AIS would help to track and identify the affected vessels (including enhancing situational awareness) and provide synergy with the NOAD portion of this rulemaking. The mandate for AIS is provided by the MTSA 2002. 
Agency: Department of Homeland Security(DHS)  Priority: Other Significant 
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Stage 
Major: Undetermined  Unfunded Mandates: No 
CFR Citation: 33 CFR 160    33 CFR 161    33 CFR 164    33 CFR 165   
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1223    33 USC 1225    33 USC 1231    46 USC 3716    46 USC 8502 and ch 701    sec 102 of PL 107-295   
Legal Deadline:  None

Statement of Need: We do not have a current mechanism in place to capture vessel, crew, passenger, or specific cargo information on vessels less than or equal to 300 gross tons (GT) intending to arrive at or depart from U.S. ports unless they are arriving with certain dangerous cargo (CDC) or are arriving at a port in the 7th Coast Guard District. The lack of NOA information on this large and diverse population of vessels represents a substantial gap in our maritime domain awareness (MDA). We can minimize this gap and enhance MDA by expanding the applicability of the NOAD regulation beyond vessels greater than 300 GT, cover all foreign commercial vessels and all U.S. commercial vessels coming from a foreign port; and enhance maritime domain awareness by tracking them (and others) with AIS. There is no current Coast Guard requirement for vessels to submit notification of departure information. This information is necessary in order to expand our MDA.

Summary of the Legal Basis: This rulemaking is based on congressional authority provided in the Ports and Waterways Safety Act and the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002.

Alternatives: Our goal is to increase MDA and to identify anomalies by correlating vessel AIS data with NOAD data. NOAD and AIS information from a greater number of vessels would provide even greater MDA than the proposed rule. We considered expanding NOAD and AIS to even more vessels, but we determined we needed additional legislative authority to expand AIS beyond what we propose in this rulemaking; and that it was best to combine additional NOAD expansion with future AIS expansion. Although not in conjunction with a proposed rule, the Coast Guard sought comment regarding expansion of AIS carriage to other waters and other vessels not subject to the current requirements (68 FR 39355-56, and 39370, July 1, 2003; USCG 2003-14878). Those comments were reviewed and considered in drafting this rule and will become part of this docket. To fulfill our agency obligations, the Coast Guard needs to receive AIS reports and NOADs from vessels identified in this rulemaking that currently are not required to provide this information. Policy or other non-binding statements by the Coast Guard addressed to the owners of these vessels would not produce the information required to sufficiently enhance our MDA to produce the information required to fulfill our Agency obligations.

Anticipated Costs and Benefits: The cost estimate in the first year of implementation is $20.6 million rounded at either seven or three percent discount rates. The cost estimate in the second year of implementation is $74.9 million or $78.0 million at seven or three percent discount rates, respectively. The annual costs after the first two years of implementation range between $6.7 million and $54.5 million, depending upon the year (of replacement) and the discount rate. These estimates are based in part on available technology. The primary benefit of this proposed rule is to enhance maritime security and safety through navigational and situational awareness. Based on analysis of past marine casualties and potential avoided injuries, the average annual quantifiable benefit from this rulemaking is approximately $1.5 million (non-discounted). We also estimated there to be additional barrels of oil not spilled by this rulemaking. These estimates may change through further development of the rulemaking and after consideration of public comments.

Risks: Considering the economic utility of U.S. ports, waterways, and coastal approaches, it is clear that a terrorist incident against our U.S. Maritime Transportation System (MTS) would have a disastrous impact on global shipping, international trade, and the world economy. By improving the ability of the Coast Guard both to identify potential terrorists coming to the United States while their vessel is far at sea and to coordinate appropriate responses and intercepts before the vessel reaches a U.S. port, this rulemaking would contribute significantly to the expansion of MDA, and consequently is instrumental in addressing the threat posed by terrorist actions against the MTS.

Timetable:
Action Date FR Cite
NPRM  01/00/2008    
Additional Information: Legal Deadline: With regard to the legal deadline, we have indicated in past notices and rulemaking documents, and it remains the case, that we have worked to coordinate implementation of AIS MTSA requirements with the development of our ability to take advantage of AIS data (68 FR 39355-56 and 39370, July 1, 2003).
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined  Government Levels Affected: None 
Federalism: No 
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes 
RIN Data Printed in the FR: No 
Agency Contact:
LT Julie Miller
Program Manager, Office of Vessel Activities, Foreign and Offshore Vessel Activities Div. CG-5432
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Coast Guard
2100 Second Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20593
Phone:202 372-1251

Jorge Arroyo
Project Manager, Office of Navigation Systems (CG-NAV-1)
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Coast Guard
2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE., STOP 7418,
Washington, DC 20593-7418
Phone:202 372-1563
Email: jorge.arroyo@uscg.mil