View Rule

View EO 12866 Meetings Printer-Friendly Version     Download RIN Data in XML

SSA RIN: 0960-AH64 Publication ID: Fall 2015 
Title: Returning Evidence at the Appeals Council Level (3844F) 
Abstract:

We propose to revise our rules regarding returning evidence at the Appeals Council level. Our current regulations require the Appeals Council to return to the claimant additional evidence when the Appeals Council finds that the evidence does not relate to the period on or before the date of the administrative law judge (ALJ) hearing decision. With the availability and use of our electronic services, and because the current procedures are not administratively efficient or cost effective, these rules would no longer require us to return any additional evidence when the Appeals Council determines the additional evidence does not relate to the period on or before the date of the ALJ decision, except in rare circumstances. We are not proposing any changes to how the Appeals Council considers additional evidence or when the Appeals Council gives protective filing based on the receipt of additional evidence.

 
Agency: Social Security Administration(SSA)  Priority: Other Significant 
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Stage 
Major: Undetermined  Unfunded Mandates: No 
CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.976    20 CFR 416.1476   
Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 401(j)    42 U.S.C. 404(f)    42 U.S.C. 405(a)    42 U.S.C. 405(b)    42 U.S.C. 405(d) to (h)    42 U.S.C. 405(j)    42 U.S.C. 405 note    42 U.S.C. 421    42 U.S.C. 421 note    42 U.S.C. 423(i)    42 U.S.C. 425    42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5)    42 U.S.C. 902 note    42 U.S.C. 1383    42 U.S.C. 1383b   
Legal Deadline:  None

Statement of Need:

We propose to amend our regulations by revising our rules regarding returning evidence at the Appeals Council (AC) level.  Our current rules state that the AC will return to the claimant additional evidence it receives when the AC finds the evidence does not relate to the period on or before the date of the administrative law judge (ALJ) hearing decision.  We are proposing these revisions to provide the AC discretion in returning additional evidence that it receives when the AC determines the additional evidence does not relate to the period on or before the date of the ALJ decision.

Summary of the Legal Basis:

Administrative--not required by statute or court order.

Alternatives:

We could have chosen not to amend our regulations, but we believe that with the increasing use of the Electronic Records Express system, the practice of returning evidence is unnecessary.  In addition, the practice of returning documents submitted to us electronically is not administratively efficient or cost-effective.

Anticipated Costs and Benefits:

These proposed rules should have no effect on Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance or Supplemental Security Income benefits.

The administrative effect of this regulation is negligible (i.e., less than 25 workyears or $2 million annually).

 

Risks:

None.

Timetable:
Action Date FR Cite
NPRM  10/21/2015  80 FR 63717   
NPRM Comment Period End  11/20/2015 
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No  Government Levels Affected: None 
Small Entities Affected: No  Federalism: No 
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes 
Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov  
RIN Data Printed in the FR: No 
Agency Contact:
Maren Weight
Appeals Officer
Social Security Administration
Office of Appellate Operations, 5107 Leesburg Pike,
Falls Church, VA 22041
Phone:703 605-7100

Brian J. Rudick
Social Insurance Specialist, Regulations Writer
Social Security Administration
Office of Regulations and Reports Clearance, 6401 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Phone:410 965-7102
Email: brian.rudick@ssa.gov