View Rule
View EO 12866 Meetings | Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML |
EPA/OAR | RIN: 2060-AT03 | Publication ID: Spring 2017 |
Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing Facilities | |
Abstract:
This action will address the agency's residual risk and technology review (RTR) of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing Facilities. The Iron and Steel Manufacturing Facilities NESHAP, subpart FFFFF, was promulgated pursuant to section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) on 5/20/03, and subsequently amended on 7/13/06. The NESHAP established emission limitations and/or work practice requirements based on maximum achievable control technology (MACT) for controlling emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from iron-making blast furnaces; steel-making oxygen furnaces; ancillary operations, such as ladling, hot metal transfer, skimming and desulfurization; and sinter plants. The HAP emitted from iron and steel sources include metal HAP (all sources) and volatile HAP (sinter plant only). This action will implement the residual risk review requirements of CAA section 112(f)(2) and the technology review requirements of CAA section 112(d)(6). The statute directs the EPA to promulgate emission standards under CAA 112(f)(2), within 8 years after the MACT standards were established, if such standards are required to ensure the risks due to HAP emissions from these facilities are acceptable and that the NESHAP provides an ample margin of safety to protect public health or to prevent, taking relevant factors into account, an adverse environmental effect. CAA section 112(d)(6) requires the EPA to review and revise the MACT standards as necessary, taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies, no less often than every 8 years. This RTR is subject to a Court Ordered deadline of 3/13/20, for a final rule. During the development of the RTR proposed rule required by the Court Order, the EPA also might consider possible options to address issues raised in Sierra Club's 3/26/04, petition for administrative reconsideration, and issues included in the voluntary remand without vacatur ordered by the D.C. Circuit Court on 6/10/10, in Sierra Club v. EPA, Case No. 03-1205, if appropriate. |
|
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) | Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant |
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda | Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-Term Actions |
Major: No | Unfunded Mandates: No |
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 | |
Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7412 Clean Air Act |
Legal Deadline:
|
|||||||||
Timetable:
|
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No | Government Levels Affected: None |
Small Entities Affected: No | Federalism: No |
Included in the Regulatory Plan: No | |
Sectors Affected: 33111 Iron and Steel Mills and Ferroalloy Manufacturing | |
RIN Data Printed in the FR: No | |
Agency Contact: Donnalee Jones Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone:919 541-5251 Fax:919 541-4991 Email: jones.donnalee@epa.gov Chuck French Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone:919 541-7912 Fax:919 541-4991 Email: french.chuck@epa.gov |