View Rule
View EO 12866 Meetings | Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML |
USDA/APHIS | RIN: 0579-AE35 | Publication ID: Fall 2018 |
Title: Animal Welfare; Amendments to Licensing Provisions and to Requirements for Dogs | |
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend the licensing requirements under the Animal Welfare Act regulations to promote compliance, reduce licensing fees, and strengthen existing safeguards that prevent individuals and businesses who have a history of noncompliance from obtaining a license or working with regulated animals. This action would reduce regulatory burden with respect to licensing and more efficiently ensure licensees’ sustained compliance with the Act. This rulemaking would also strengthen the veterinary care and watering standards for regulated dogs to better align the regulations with the humane care and treatment standards set by the Animal Welfare Act . . |
|
Agency: Department of Agriculture(USDA) | Priority: Other Significant |
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda | Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Stage |
Major: No | Unfunded Mandates: No |
EO 13771 Designation: Other | |
CFR Citation: 9 CFR 1 to 3 | |
Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2131 to 2159 |
Legal Deadline:
None |
||||||||||||||||||
Statement of Need: Although an applicant for a license renewal must also certify that he or she is in compliance with all regulations, the current regulations do not require the applicant to show compliance before APHIS renews his or her license. As a result, licensees can currently renew their licenses indefinitely without undergoing a thorough compliance inspection. This proposal would require persons to seek a new license every three years and demonstrate compliance with the AWA regulations as part of the application process. Further, the current regulations do not require a licensee to show compliance when the licensee makes any subsequent changes to his or her animals or facilities, including noteworthy changes in the number or type of animals used in regulated activity. Based on our experience with enforcing the AWA and regulations, we are concerned that many licensees struggle to achieve and maintain compliance after making such changes to their animals used in regulated activity. |
||||||||||||||||||
Summary of the Legal Basis: Under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA or the Act, 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.), the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to promulgate standards and other requirements governing the humane handling, care, treatment, and transportation of certain animals by dealers, exhibitors, operators of auction sales, research facilities, and carriers and intermediate handlers. Definitions, regulations, and standards established under the AWA are contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in 9 CFR parts 1, 2, and 3 (referred to below as the regulations). Part 2 provides administrative requirements and sets forth institutional responsibilities for regulated parties, including licensing requirements for dealers, exhibitors, and operators of auction sales. |
||||||||||||||||||
Alternatives: APHIS considered several alternatives in developing various aspects of the proposed rule. Regarding the types of animals that would trigger the need for a new license, APHIS considered requiring a new license for all exotic or wild animal changes, but rejected this in favor of requiring a new license for types of animals that are dangerous and have unique regulatory and care needs. With respect to license termination following two or more attempted inspections during the period of licensure, APHIS considered requiring immediate termination but decided in favor of allowing the licensee the opportunity to first present evidence in defense. APHIS also considered different time frames for the fixed-term license (e.g., four or five years) and settled on three years based on our experience administering the AWA. |
||||||||||||||||||
Anticipated Costs and Benefits: This rule would result in cost savings for both APHIS and licensees by simplifying the licensing process and reducing fees, while enhancing the protection of covered animals. Total cost reductions for affected entities are expected to range between $600,000 and $2.1 million per year. In accordance with guidance on complying with EO 13771, the single primary estimate of cost savings for this proposed rule is $1.37 million, the midpoint estimate of savings annualized in perpetuity using a 7 percent discount rate. |
||||||||||||||||||
Risks: This proposed rule would address two existing areas of concern. As noted, it is possible for licensees to renew their licenses without undergoing a thorough compliance inspection and for licensees to make noteworthy changes in the number or type of animals used in regulated activity. This rulemaking would address those concerns by requiring licensees to affirmatively demonstrate compliance with the AWA regulations and standards and to obtain a new license when making noteworthy changes subsequent to the issuance of a license in regard to the number, type, or location of animals used in regulated activities. |
||||||||||||||||||
Timetable:
|
Additional Information: Additional information about APHIS and its programs is available on the Internet at http://www.aphis.usda.gov. | |
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No | Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State |
Federalism: No | |
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes | |
RIN Data Printed in the FR: No | |
Agency Contact: Christine Jones Chief of Staff, Animal Care Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 4700 River Road, Unit 84, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231 Phone:301 851-3730 |