NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA)

Statement of Regulatory Priorities

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) aim is to increase human understanding of the solar system and the universe that contains it and to improve American aeronautics ability. NASA's basic organization consists of the Headquarters, nine field Centers, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (a federally funded research and development center), and several component installations which report to Center Directors. Responsibility for overall planning, coordination, and control of NASA programs is vested in NASA Headquarters, located in Washington, DC.

NASA continues to implement programs according to its 2018 Strategic Plan. The Agency's mission is to "Lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system and bring new knowledge and opportunities back to Earth. Support growth of the Nation's economy in space and aeronautics, increase understanding of the universe and our place in it, work with industry to improve America's aerospace technologies, and advance American leadership." The FY 2018 Strategic Plan (available at https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nasa_2018_strategic_plan.pdf) guides NASA's program activities through a framework of the following four strategic goals:

  • Strategic Goal 1: Expand human knowledge through new scientific discoveries.

  • Strategic Goal 2: Extend human presence deeper into space and to the Moon for sustainable long-term exploration and utilization.

  • Strategic Goal 3: Address national challenges and catalyze economic growth.

  • Strategic Goal 4: Optimize capabilities and operations.

    In the decades since Congress enacted the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, NASA has challenged its scientific and engineering capabilities in pursuing its mission, generating tremendous results and benefits for humankind. NASA will continue to push scientific and technical boundaries in pursuit of these goals.

    NASA's Regulatory Philosophy and Principles

    The Agency's rulemaking program strives to be responsive, efficient, and transparent. As noted in Executive Order 13609, "Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation" (May 1, 2012), international regulatory cooperation, consistent with domestic law and prerogatives and U.S. trade policy, can be an important means of promoting public health, welfare, safety, and our environment as well as economic growth, innovation, competitiveness, and job creation.

    NASA, along with the Departments of State and Commerce and Defense, engage with other countries in the Wassenaar Arrangement, Nuclear Suppliers Group, Australia Group, and Missile Technology Control Regime through which the international community develops a common list of items that should be subject to export controls. NASA has also been a key participant in the Administration's Export Control Reform effort that resulted in a complete overhaul of the U.S. Munitions List and fundamental changes to the Commerce Control List. New controls have facilitated transfers of goods and technologies to allies and partners while helping prevent transfers to countries of national security and proliferation concerns.

    Executive Order 13777, "Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda" (February 24, 2017), required NASA to appoint a Regulatory Reform Officer to oversee the implementation of regulatory reform initiatives and policies and establish a Regulatory Reform Task Force (Task Force) to review and evaluate existing regulations and make recommendations to the Agency head regarding their repeal, replacement, or modification, consistent with applicable law. NASA is doing this work primarily through its work as a signatory to the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council.

    The FAR at 48 CFR chapter 1 contains procurement regulations that apply to NASA and other Federal agencies. Pursuant to 41 U.S.C. section 1302 and FAR 1.103(b), the FAR is jointly prepared, issued, and maintained by the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services, and the Administrator of NASA, under their several statutory authorities.

    These reform initiatives and policies include Executive Order 13771, "Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs" (January 30, 2017), section 6 of Executive Order 13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review" (January 18, 2011), and Executive Order 12866.

    In addition, NASA implements and supplements FAR requirements through the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS), 48 CFR chapter 18. As a result of the ongoing review, evaluation, and recommendations of the FAR Task Force and internal Agency discussions, NASA has identified priority regulatory and deregulatory actions that reduce costs to the public by eliminating unnecessary, ineffective, and duplicative regulations.

    The Agency has focused its regulatory resources on the most serious acquisition, health, and personnel and readiness risks as discussed below.

    NASA will revise the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) to implement section 823 of NASA Transition Authorization of 2017 (Pub. L. 115-10) to improve the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts in the supply chain. This revision will add a contract clause to the NFS to require each covered contractor, including a subcontractor, to detect and avoid the inclusion of any counterfeit parts in electronic parts or products that contain electronic parts, take corrective actions necessary to remedy, and notify the applicable NASA contracting officer not later than 30 calendar days after the date the covered contractor becomes aware, or has reason to suspect, that any end item, component, part, or material contained in supplies purchased by NASA, or purchased by a covered contractor or subcontractor for delivery to, or on behalf of, NASA contains a counterfeit electronic part or suspect counterfeit electronic part.