View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Blank fields in records indicate information that was not collected or not collected electronically prior to July 2006.
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
3060-0854
ICR Reference No:
199810-3060-003
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency:
FCC
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Truth-in-Billing Format -- CC Docket No. 98-170 (Proposed Rule)
Type of Information Collection:
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
12/23/1998
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
10/05/1998
Terms of Clearance:
OMB received a large number of comments from various sectors of the telecommunications industry and several state regulatory agencies. This is a very contentious issue with parties offering a number of valid criticisms and supporting views related to the FCC NPRM. After reviewing the comments submitted to OMB, it is apparent that, because this is a rulemaking and given the preliminary nature of the proposals contained in this item, OMB must review this collection upon release of the Report and Order related to CC Docket 98-170. OMB strongly encourages the FCC not to adopt an approach that imposes undue burden on wireless providers and small wireline services -- and urges flexibility be given to small companies that may experience significant cost and managerial issues related to implementation of any billing requirements. The FCC should also allow companies sufficient time to address their Year 2000 efforts as well as modifying their billing systems to meet any new requirements. OMB recommends that the FCC make a concerted effort to work with industry to establish voluntary guidelines in lieu of mandatory requirements that restrict the ability of firms to tailor their billing to meet the needs of customers. The FCC and states should cooperate to minimize conflicting or duplicative billing requirements. Comments indicate a general agreement that: a) new charges or services need to be easily identifiable on bill; b) definitions of services and other terms are difficult to reach and could be counterproductive; c) more information, including point of contact toll free numbers, for service providers or billing agents needs to be included in billing materials; d) materials should be clear, concise, and relatively simple; e) the FCC must account for costs of any changes to bills that will be passed on to consumers in making decisions; f) CMRS and other wireless firms that provide services only to businesses should be exempt from most new requirements that would be imposed on wireline carriers; g) every effort should be made so that billing standards are uniform across the nation; h) reseller information should be included (in a same format as service provider information); and i) where possible, market-based solutions should be adopted unless there is conclusive evidence that there is either a failure or the FCC cannot adequately enforce its current rules and therefore must enact regulations that affect billing practices. OMB believes these are reasonable recommendations that should be included in this rulemaking. The FCC shall submit this collection to OMB again following release of the Report and Order, prior to requiring compliance with any new billing format regulations.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
12/31/2001
12/31/2001
Responses
1,800
0
0
Time Burden (Hours)
185,400
0
0
Cost Burden (Dollars)
9,000,000
0
0
Abstract:
The Commission proposes to make consumer's telephone bills easier to read and understand. Telephone bills do not provide necessary information in a user-friendly format. As a result, consumers are experiencing difficulty in understanding their bills, in detecting fraud on their telephone bills, in comparing carrier rates to get the best value for themselves, and in resolving billing disputes.
Authorizing Statute(s):
None
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
1
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Truth-in-Billing Format -- CC Docket No. 98-170 (Proposed Rule)
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
1,800
0
0
1,800
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
185,400
0
0
185,400
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
9,000,000
0
0
9,000,000
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$0
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
10/05/1998
Something went wrong when downloading this file. If you have any questions, please send an email to risc@gsa.gov.