View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0648-0318
ICR Reference No:
200811-0648-003
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
200510-0648-003
Agency/Subagency:
DOC/NOAA
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
NMFS Alaska Region Observer Providers
Type of Information Collection:
Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
08/16/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
12/12/2008
Terms of Clearance:
This request to collect information is approved. Prior to resubmission, the Agency should clarify the source of estimate of the number of respondents and burden hours per activity based on most recent program experience.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
08/31/2012
36 Months From Approved
08/31/2009
Responses
2,750
0
2,995
Time Burden (Hours)
875
0
1,959
Cost Burden (Dollars)
854
0
83,000
Abstract:
NMFS North Pacific Groundfish Observer Program was implemented in early 1990. Observers in this Program collect and disseminate catch, bycatch, and biological data necessary to support in- season monitoring and stock assessment. Alaska Fisheries Science Center in Seattle, Washington, provides the operational oversight of the program, certification training, definition of observer sampling duties and methods, debriefing of observers, and management of the data. Owners of vessels, shoreside processors, or stationary floating processors required to carry observers must arrange for observer services from an observer provider.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 194 - 265 303
Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as amended in 2006
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
73 FR 37931
07/02/2008
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
73 FR 75384
12/11/2008
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
14
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Appeals for Observer Provider Permit Expiration or Denial of Permit
Certificates of insurance
Industry Request for Assistance in Improving Observer Data Quality Issues
NMFS Alaska Region Observer Providers - candidate college transcripts and statements
Observer briefing registration
Observer debriefing registration
Observer deployment/logistics report
Observer provider contracts
Observer provider permit application
Observer training registration
Other reports
Physical examination verification
Projected observer assignment
Update to provider information
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
2,750
2,995
0
10
-255
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
875
1,959
0
0
-1,084
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
854
83,000
0
0
-82,146
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
In some parts of the previous analysis, large respondent numbers were used instead of the 5, for observer providers. The large numbers inaccurately described the number of reports or the number of observers. This analysis is revised to correct those errors. In addition, this analysis uses the number 60 as the number of observers per observer provider when appropriate; the estimated total number of observers is 300. The following adjustments also occurred in this action: The total number of respondents is corrected to read 15 (10 industry requests, 5 observer providers) in place of 205. The total number of responses is corrected to read 2,750 in place of 2,995. This reduction is caused in part by removing items that describe observer requirements, because it is inappropriate to have them in this collection which describes observer providers. These items are: college transcript submission by observer candidates, observer physical examinations; and observer appeals for certification, decertification, or suspension. The total number of burden hours is revised from 1,959 to 875, due to removal of items described above. The total personnel costs are revised from $48,975 to $21,875, due to removal of items described above. The total miscellaneous costs are revised to $854 to replace $83,126, a net decrease of $82,272 (note: as ROCIS rounded down the previously requested costs to $83,000, the difference in ROCIS appears to be $82,146). A decrease of $82,432 was due to: 1) removal of items described above and 2) the change of report submittal to email in place of fax for almost all responses, because email is almost always used for this purpose. An increase of $160 was due to the correction of cost for submitting a fax from $1 to $6 and increase in the postage rate from $0.37 to $0.42.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$20,350
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Patsy Bearden 907 586-7008
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
12/12/2008
Something went wrong when downloading this file. If you have any questions, please send an email to risc@gsa.gov.