View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
3084-0144
ICR Reference No:
201005-3084-005
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
200711-3084-003
Agency/Subagency:
FTC
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Procedures to Enhance the Accuracy and Integrity of Information Furnished to Consumer Reporting Agencies
Type of Information Collection:
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
06/18/2010
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
06/03/2010
Terms of Clearance:
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
06/30/2013
36 Months From Approved
Responses
40,119
0
0
Time Burden (Hours)
95,039
0
0
Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
Abstract:
The FTC, OCC, Board, FDIC, OTS, and NCUA (Agencies) have published final regulations and guidelines to implement the accuracy and integrity provisions in section 312 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act). The regulations and guidelines implement the requirement that the Agencies issue guidelines for use by furnishers regarding the accuracy and integrity of the information about consumers that they furnish to consumer reporting agencies and prescribe regulations requiring furnishers to establish reasonable policies and procedures for implementing the guidelines.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 108 - 159 312
Name of Law: Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
PL: Pub.L. 108 - 159 312 Name of Law: Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
3084-AA94
Final or interim final rulemaking
74 FR 31484
07/01/2009
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
Yes
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
4
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
660.3 rqmt to implement written policies to ensure accurate info, related training
660.4 implementation of rqmt to notify consumers that a dispute is frivolous
660.4 rqmts to amend procedures to handle complaints directly from cnsumers
Dispute notices by information furnishers in any given year
Information furnishers implementing the notice requirement for direct disputes
Information furnishers implementing written policy rqmt, related training, and amending procedures to handle direct disputes as CRAs do
Time to prepare a sec.660.4 notice of frivolous or irrelevant dispute
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
40,119
0
57,815
-17,696
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
95,039
0
162,974
-67,935
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Reduction Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Short Statement:
In actuality, estimated burden hours have increased from the proposed regulations to the final regulations, not on account of increased requirements, but, rather, having factored in public comments about the prior estimates. For the ICs pertaining to the proposed regulations, the FTC previously estimated 67,935 hours, and those ICs were attributable to the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 ("FACT Act") amendments to the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970 ("FCRA"). For the final rule, the FTC's estimates were increased to 95,039 hours. As before, the ICs tie to the FACT Act amendments to the FCRA. Moreover, for the final regulations, we have reorganized in ROCIS the LOBs reflective of the new regulation sections to which they pertain (16 CFR sections 660.3 and 660.4). Thus, notwithstanding the ROCIS forced mathematical results appearing above under the "ICR Summary of Burden" that show decreases under "Agency Discretion," the reality is that the ICs have been partially reorganized and reclassified for the final rule and any changes in estimates have been to increase, not decrease, them (specifically, average time per respondent and average time per notice). As demonstrated further in the Supporting Statement, the average burden per respondent to implement written procedures under 16 CFR 660.3 to ensure accuracy of information is increased to 9.33 hours from the prior 8.33 hour estimate (25 hrs. per respondent annualized over a projected 3 year PRA clearance) for the proposed regulations. For the NPRM submission, however, we then paired that estimate with an estimate for the separate section 660.4 requirement to amend procedures to handle disputes received directly from consumers in the same manner as disputes received from CRAs. Thus, the comparison in ROCIS somewhat misleadingly becomes 9.33 hours for the final regulations versus 9.67 hours, instead of 9.33 versus 8.33. It is more appropriate, however, to keep these sections separate in fashioning appropriate ICs, as we now do in presenting them in this instant submission. Moreover, the estimate for that separate section 660.4 requirement to amend procedures to handle direct disputes in the same manner as disputes received from CRAs has actually increased, from 1.33 hours per respondent (annualized over a projected 3-year PRA clearance) to 2.67 hours. To the same effect, the estimate for implementing the new dispute notice requirement, also under section 660.4, has been increased from 1.33 hours per respondent to 2.67 hours. Finally, in response to public comment, the FTC has also increased its estimate of the time to prepare a notice to consumers that a dispute is frivolous or irrelevant. Previously, that estimate per notice was 5 minutes; now it is 14 minutes. The bases behind these estimates and their increases are further detailed in the Supporting Statement.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$15,750
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Pavneet Singh 2023263015
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
06/03/2010