View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0648-0515
ICR Reference No:
201112-0648-011
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
201110-0648-002
Agency/Subagency:
DOC/NOAA
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Alaska Interagency Electronic Reporting System
Type of Information Collection:
No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
02/17/2012
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
12/19/2011
Terms of Clearance:
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
11/30/2012
11/30/2012
11/30/2012
Responses
46,064
0
46,064
Time Burden (Hours)
19,084
0
19,084
Cost Burden (Dollars)
4,612
0
4,612
Abstract:
There will be a change to eLandings Mothership Landing Report, adding checkbox to indicate catcher vessel movement to avoid Chinook salmon due to associated proposed rule, RIN 0648- BA80.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 94 - 265 303
Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Management and Conservation Act
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Final or interim final rulemaking
76 FR 40628
07/11/2011
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
73 FR 76615
12/17/2008
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
74 FR 28017
06/12/2009
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
3
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Alaska Interagency Electronic Reporting System - Registration
eLandings Landing Report
NA, NA, NA, NA
Interim Crab Landing Report
,
Interim groundfish landing report
,
Shoreside Processor Out of State Landing Report
,
ADF&G Electronic Groundfish Ticket
eLandings Production Report
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
46,064
46,064
0
0
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
19,084
19,084
0
0
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
4,612
4,612
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
The following adjustments are made due to having actual annual numbers of responses: IERS processor registration is decreased because registration is necessary only once unless changes occur a decrease of 1,262 respondents and responses, 15 instead of 1,277 a decrease of 315 burden, 4 instead of 319 a decrease of $7,875 personnel costs, $100 instead of $7,975 a decrease of $555 miscellaneous costs, $7 instead of $562 eLandings landings report is decreased because actual annual counts are available a decrease of 1,038 respondents, 239 instead of 1,277 a decrease of 35,457 responses, 21,623 instead of 57,080 a decrease of 20,493 burden, 12,613 instead of 33,106 a decrease of $514,045 personnel costs, $315,325 instead of $827,650 a decrease of $2,347 miscellaneous costs, $2,162 instead of $4,509 eLandings production report is decreased because actual annual counts are available a decrease of 27 respondents, 178 instead of 205 a decrease of 16,574 responses, 24,426 instead of 41,000 a decrease of 17,313 burden, 6,467 instead of 23,780 a decrease of $432,825 personnel costs, $161,675 instead of $594,500 a decrease of $1,657 miscellaneous costs, $2,443 instead of $4,100 Manual landing report is removed because the costs and burden are included in eLandings reports a decrease of 20 respondents, 0 instead of 20 a decrease of 960 responses, 0 instead of 960 a decrease of 557 burden, 0 instead of 557 a decrease of $13,925 personnel costs, $0 instead of $13,925 a decrease of $5,760 miscellaneous costs, $0 instead of $5,760
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$100
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Patsy Bearden 907 586-7008
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
12/19/2011
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
The site is secure.
