View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0648-0376
ICR Reference No:
201202-0648-005
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
200808-0648-002
Agency/Subagency:
DOC/NOAA
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Fishing Capacity Reduction Program Buyback Requests
Type of Information Collection:
Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
05/21/2012
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
02/21/2012
Terms of Clearance:
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
05/31/2015
36 Months From Approved
05/31/2012
Responses
7,969
0
10,637
Time Burden (Hours)
18,922
0
27,928
Cost Burden (Dollars)
1,704
0
1,680
Abstract:
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) manages the capacity reduction loans issued in accordance with fishing capacity reduction programs to prevent or end overfishing, rebuild stocks of fish, or achieve measurable or significant improvements in the conservation and management of the fishery. Under the authority of section 312(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the Secretary may buy back vessels and/or fishing permits in order to obtain the maximum sustained reduction in fishing capacity at the least cost and in a minimum period of time. Funding for such programs is authorized under Section 312(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and allows NMFS to obtain funding under authorization of the Saltonstall-Kennedy Act, through specific appropriations, from industry fee systems, and from public, private, or non-profit sources.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 104 - 297 312
Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
76 FR 54432
09/01/2011
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
77 FR 9890
02/21/2012
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
8
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Advance and post-bid referenda and bids
Advisements of conflicts in ownership claims
Buyer (or seller) annual reports
Buyer (or seller) monthly reports
NA, NA, NA, NA
AFA Pollock Fee Collection Settlement Sheet
,
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Fee Collection Report
,
BSAI Non-Pollock Groundfish Fee Collection Report
,
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fee Collection Report
Buyer recordkeeping (fish tickets)
Buyer/seller reports
Fishing Capacity Reduction Program Implementation Plans
State approvals of implementation plans and amendments to state FMP
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
7,969
10,637
0
0
-2,668
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
18,922
27,928
0
0
-9,006
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
1,704
1,680
0
0
24
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
Adjustments: Our figures from the previous PRA approval have been adjusted to reflect our actual experience based on averaged data from the programs listed in Question 12 above. Our practical experience indicates that only one implementation plan per year for industry-funded buybacks in a federal or state fishery is likely rather than one in each a federal and a state fishery as previously estimated. Consequently the number of annual reports being provided has not increased as previously estimated. Originally, fish tickets were going to be submitted to the buyback program, but we have instead been able to fully rely on the state fish ticket process and use the data already being provided under their regulations, so no additional burden has occurred as previously estimated. It is possible future buyback programs will not be for fisheries having state fish tickets, and will require an additional line item on fish tickets and 10 minutes for that modification has been provided in the current estimates, based on fish ticket submission being required for half of the new programs. New estimate: 3,600 responses and 600 hours, down from 6,600 responses and 1,100 hours. Seller/buyer reports are now estimated to average 10 per year, down from 112, with an average of 49 hours, down from 224. This decrease was partially offset by increasing the time per response to four hours, up from the previous 2 hours estimated, as that was determined to be too low an estimate. There was an increase in the number of monthly buyer fee collection reports due to the large number of fish buyers in the Pacific Coast Groundfish program in comparison to the other three programs: 3,010, up from 1,296 and related hours: 6,020, up from 2,592. The net decrease in responses is 2,668 (7,969, down from 10,637) and in hours, 9,005 (18,923, down from 27,928). Estimated average costs have increased by a net of $24, due mainly to monthly buyer fee collection reports and a postage increase.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$0
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Liz Ryan 301 427-8777
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
02/21/2012
Something went wrong when downloading this file. If you have any questions, please send an email to risc@gsa.gov.