View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0648-0203
ICR Reference No:
201305-0648-006
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
200909-0648-004
Agency/Subagency:
DOC/NOAA
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Northwest Region Federal Fisheries Permits
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
08/08/2013
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
06/24/2013
Terms of Clearance:
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
08/31/2016
36 Months From Approved
08/31/2013
Responses
722
0
4,584
Time Burden (Hours)
982
0
1,996
Cost Burden (Dollars)
56,287
0
46,345
Abstract:
As part of its fishery management responsibilities, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) collects certain information to determine whether a respondent complies with regulations that pertain to the issuance, transfer, ownership interest or renewal of a Pacific Coast Groundfish limited entry permit or exempted fishing permit. Also, NMFS collects information from permit owners and vessel owners to assist NMFS with its enforcement responsibilities. Exempted fishing permit holders may be required to provide descriptions of planned fishing activities, periodic data reports, preseason plans, and summary reports. The respondents are mainly groundfish fishermen or fishing companies or partnerships. Other respondents include state fisheries agencies, non-profits groups, or fishing associations who sponsor research carried out under exempted fishing permits.
Authorizing Statute(s):
US Code:
16 USC 1801 et seq (Secction 303)
Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
78 FR 6071
01/29/2013
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
78 FR 37781
06/24/2013
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
7
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
EFP Pre-Season Plan
EFP Summaries
EFP Trip/Delivery Notifications
EFP data reports
Exempted fishing permit - proposal
Limited Entry Permit Renewal
NA, NA, NA
Pacific Coast Groundfish Limited Entry Permit Renewal
,
Cather-Processor Pacific Coast Groundfish Limited Entry Permit
,
Mothership/Catcher Vessel Pacific Coast Groundfish Limited Entry Permit
Limited Entry Permit Transfer
NA
Change of vessel registration permit owner or vessel owner application
Ownership Interest Forms for Sablefish Endorsed LEP - accompanying either LEP renewal or transfer
NA
ID of ownership interest - pacific coast groundfish sable endorsed permit
Participating Vessel/Processor EFP Application
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
722
4,584
0
-2,440
-1,422
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
982
1,996
0
-93
-921
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
56,287
46,345
0
-1,218
11,160
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Reduction Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Short Statement:
Program Changes Elimination of call-in notifications prior to a landing removed 2,400 responses, 80 hours and $1,200. Previously, 40 of the 45 EFPs were issued to vessels and processors of whiting as a means of prosecuting the fishery and to collect information on a full retention fishery. Response time for participating vessel/processor EFPs was 20 minutes. Since the submission of the previous collection, NMFS has implemented a trawl catch shares program (OMB Control No. 0648-0619) which requires observers to be on all vessels and in the processing plants and observers account for fish caught/landed or discarded at sea. The requirement for an EFP for the whiting fishery for these purposes has been eliminated. This results in a net decrease of 40 permit applications, and based on the previous estimate of 20 minutes per application for this group, a decrease of 13 hours and $18. Total program changes: Decrease of 2,440 responses, 93 hours and $1,218. Adjustments The annual burden hours for LEP transfers and renewals, including ownership interest forms, has increased from 185 hours to 223 hours. Most of the increase is due to an increase in the number of annual number of transfer requests, from 80 to 150 per year, with the total increase being 88 responses and 38 hours. There has been an increase in the estimated regular EFP application time, from 8 to 32 hours. This increase in time to prepare an EFP application is not due to any change in procedures or program regulations, however, given our discussions with applicants we realize that we have underestimated the amount of time required prepare such documents. The nature of current EFP application is focused on experimental activities and requires a well-structured methodology and coordination with a number of participants (i.e. vessels), which requires greater time. For the previously estimated number of 5 applications, this is an increase of 120 hours. For the additional 5 estimated to be received, this adds a total of 160 hours. Total increase: 5 responses and 280 hours. There were previously an estimated 20 harvest plans, and now 5 are expected (one per EFP). At 16 hours per plan, this results in a decrease of 15 responses and 240 hours. EFP Data Reports were previously 1,560 responses x 43 minutes per response = 1,118 hours and the new time burden estimate for data reports is 60 responses x 2 hours per = 120 hours (12 reports for each of the 5 EFPs). The results in a decrease of 1,500 responses and 998 hours. The estimated annual cost burden for LEP respondents is mainly due to an increase of the permit processing fees. The most recent fee calculation included increased NOAA overhead rates and incremental increase of staff time to process renewal applications. The renewal fee for LEPs in 2012 was $135 per permit. This application fee was an increase from $110 renewal fee given in the prior collection. The increase in the renewal fee is due a minor increase in staff time to process renewals and slight increases in NOAA overhead rates. The increased renewal fee amount accounts for most of the increase in the total annual cost burden to respondents (an increase of $9,705: from $43,890 ($110 x 399) to $53,595 ($135 x 397). In addition, notary fees for ownership interest forms were incorrectly omitted from the 2009 extension, so an increase of $900 is shown. Other minor adjustments due to change in number of responses and increase in postage are a net increase of $555. Total adjustments: Net decrease of 1,422 responses and 920 hours; net increase of $11,160.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$12,281
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Kevin Ford 2065266115
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
06/24/2013
Something went wrong when downloading this file. If you have any questions, please send an email to risc@gsa.gov.