View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
3084-0005
ICR Reference No:
201307-3084-001
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
201106-3084-002
Agency/Subagency:
FTC
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Hart-Scott-Rodino (Premerger notification) Rules and Report Form
Type of Information Collection:
No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
08/19/2013
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
07/11/2013
Terms of Clearance:
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
08/31/2014
08/31/2014
08/31/2014
Responses
1,471
0
1,470
Time Burden (Hours)
53,759
0
53,756
Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
Abstract:
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has amended the premerger notification rules to provide a framework for the withdrawal of a premerger notification filing under the Hart Scott Rodino Act. The final rulemaking sets forth the procedure for voluntarily withdrawing an HSR filing, establishes when an HSR filing will be automatically withdrawn if a filing publicly announcing the termination of a transaction is made with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and rules promulgated under that act, and sets forth the procedure for resubmitting a filing after a withdrawal without incurring an additional filing fee. The rule amendments formalize the existing informal procedure for parties to voluntarily withdraw and resubmit their filings. Consequently, the amendments do not change the burden with respect to transactions for which the filings are voluntarily withdrawn under §803.12(a). Calculating the burden for the auto-withdrawal amendments in §803.12(b) requires an analysis of two potential scenarios. In one scenario, a filing is automatically withdrawn and the acquiring person utilizes the two-day resubmission process under §803.12(c). In that case, no additional transaction is generated as the acquiring person simply restarts the waiting period on the same transaction. In the second scenario, the parties to a terminated transaction for which the filing is automatically withdrawn do not utilize the two-day resubmission process under §803.12(c) but later decide to move forward with the transaction. In that case, a new filing would be required. Both of these scenarios are rare, as it is very unlikely that a transaction for which the HSR filing is automatically withdrawn during the merger review process (due to the parties' SEC filing indicating that the transaction has been terminated) would be subsequently restarted. Based on past experience, this would occur approximately once every fifteen years. If the parties to such a transaction do not utilize the two-day resubmission process, the rule change would require non-index HSR filings for, on average, a small fraction of a single transaction per year. The currently cleared estimate for a single non-index filing is 37 hours. FTC staff believes that this new filing would require the same work and diligence as any new non-index filing. Based on an average of 37 hours for one transaction, applied to an historical frequency of once every fifteen years, this amounts to an annual average of 3 hours, rounded up.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 94 - 435 90 Stat. 1390
Name of Law: Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976
US Code:
15 USC 18a
Name of Law: Clayton Act
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
3084-AA91
Final or interim final rulemaking
76 FR 42471
07/19/2011
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
4
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Index Filings
Non-index Filings
C4
Notification and Report Form for Certain Mergers and Acquisitions (DRAFT)
Non-index Filings Requiring More Precise Valuation
Non-index filing for a withdrawn transaction not employing the two-day resubmission process
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
1,471
1,470
0
1
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
53,759
53,756
0
3
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Changing Regulations
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
Assuming an average of 37 hours for an non-index filing transaction of this nature, applied to a traditional frequency of once every fifteen years, this amounts to an annual increment of 3 hours.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$5,215,715
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Robert Jones 202 326-3100 RJones@ftc.gov
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
07/11/2013