View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
3048-0021
ICR Reference No:
201503-3048-003
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
201311-3048-003
Agency/Subagency:
EXIMBANK
Agency Tracking No:
EIB 92-30
Title:
Report of Premiums Payable for Financial Institutions Only
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Emergency
Approval Requested By:
03/10/2015
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved with change
Conclusion Date:
04/08/2015
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
03/03/2015
Terms of Clearance:
In consultation with SBA, instruments revised to better track what exports Ex-Im Bank is covering with its insurance policy and the extent to which its support assists U.S. small businesses.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
10/31/2015
6 Months From Approved
02/28/2017
Responses
2,580
0
2,580
Time Burden (Hours)
1,290
0
860
Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
Abstract:
The information requested enables the applicant to provide Ex-Im Bank with the information necessary to record customer utilization and manage prospective insurance liability relative to risk premiums received. The Export-Import Bank has made a change to the report to have the insured financial institution provide the industry code (NAICS) associated with each specific export as well as specific information needed to make a determination as to whether or not the exporter meets the SBA's definition of a small business. The insured financial institution already provides a short description of the goods and/or services being exported and the name and address of the exporter. These additional pieces of information will allow Ex-Im Bank to better track what exports it is covering with its insurance policy and the extent to which its support assists U.S. small businesses. The other change that Ex-Im Bank has made is to require the insured financial institution to indicate whether the exporter is a minority-owned business, women-owned business and/or veteran-owned business. Although answers to the question are mandatory, the company may choose any one of the three answers: Yes/No/Decline to Answer. The option of "Decline to Answer" allows a company to consciously decline to answer the specific question should they not wish to answer.
Emergency Justfication:
Ex-Im Bank is requesting an emergency approval to add four questions to this form. This form is already approved and in use for any identified U.S. exporter or U.S. supplier as part of their financing application process with the Bank. The bank wishes to address promptly the Congressional mandate and concerns raised with respect to the Bank’s current practice of identifying and classifying small businesses, as well as minority-, woman-, and veteran-owned businesses. Ex-Im Bank is under intense scrutiny from Congress as both the House and Senate consider whether to reauthorize the Ex-Im Bank for another five years. Ex-Im Bank’s current charter is due to expire on June 30, 2015. Failure to reauthorize Ex-Im Bank will mean that Ex-Im Bank will not be able to meet its mission of supporting U.S. jobs through financing U.S. exports. In FY14, Ex-Im Bank supported $27.5 billion in U.S. exports and more than 164,000 American jobs. A similar volume of exports and jobs would be affected if Ex-Im Bank were not reauthorized in June 2015. Congress has a mandate in Ex-Im Bank’s charter that it must make available at least 20 percent of its financing for small businesses. As Congress evaluates the Administration’s request to reauthorize Ex-Im Bank, it has been asking for information and data about Ex-Im Bank and the companies it supports. Recently, an article published by Reuters indicated that there were problems with Ex-Im Bank’s classification of some small business exporters. Consequently, various Members of Congress have been asking what Ex-Im Bank is doing to improve its data quality, particularly with regard to its identification of small business exporters. Some Members of Congress have called into question whether they are willing to support Ex-Im Bank’s reauthorization in light of the Bank’s perceived “inability” to correctly identify its small business customers, including minority-, woman-, and veteran-owned business. Ex-Im Bank needs to demonstrate that it is quickly addressing the small business classification concern or run the risk that a number of Members of Congress will vote against Ex-Im Bank’s reauthorization, thus throwing into question the extent to which $27.5 billion in exports will occur in the following year. Ex-Im Bank must ensure that it has all the necessary information to determine whether or not a specific customer meets the SBA guidelines for being designated as a small business. Ex-Im Bank is not changing the methodology for determining if a company is a small business, rather it is requesting sufficient information directly from customers to make an independent determination that a particular business meets the SBA guidelines. Ex-Im Bank’s practice to date for gathering small business classification information is to rely on Dun & Bradstreet for these data points – company ownership (parents, affiliates, and subsidiaries), NAICS industry code, number of employees and annual sales volume as well as for woman-owned and minority-owned. Unfortunately, the quality of D&B’s data on these points has not been sufficient. The only way Ex-Im Bank can ensure that it is making an accurate determination is to ask the customer to provide this information. Thus, the change for which Ex-Im Bank is requesting an emergency clearance is to add the four additional questions to this application form for any identified U.S. exporter or U.S. supplier. Lack of an emergency approval of this form would limit Ex-Im Bank’s ability to quickly address Congressional concerns with identifying and classifying small businesses. This would adversely impact Ex-Im Bank’s reputation on the Hill and could result in Ex-Im Bank not being reauthorized – thus threatening future export sales and jobs. Accordingly, Ex-Im Bank requests emergency approval.
Authorizing Statute(s):
US Code:
12 USC 635
Name of Law: Export-Import Bank Act 1945
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
1
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Report of Premiums Payable for Financial Institutions Only
EIB 92-30
EIB 92-30, Report of Premiums Payable for Financial Institutions Only
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
2,580
2,580
0
0
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
1,290
860
0
430
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
The requested ICR Burden reflects the Bank's most recent experience.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$43,860
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Alla Lake 202 565-3352 alla.lake@exim.gov
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
03/03/2015