View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
3141-0009
ICR Reference No:
201508-3141-002
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
201207-3141-009
Agency/Subagency:
NIGC
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Minimum Internal Control Standards for Class II Gaming
Type of Information Collection:
Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
11/23/2015
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
09/21/2015
Terms of Clearance:
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
11/30/2018
36 Months From Approved
11/30/2015
Responses
834
0
368
Time Burden (Hours)
11,341
0
40,538
Cost Burden (Dollars)
8,736,040
0
0
Abstract:
Amongst other actions necessary to carry out the National Indian Gaming Commission's (NIGC) statutory duties, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act directs the Commission to monitor class II gaming conducted on Indian lands on a continuing basis in order to ensure that the Indian tribe is the primary beneficiary of the gaming operation and to protect such gaming as a means of generating tribal revenue, and to assure that gaming is conducted fairly and honestly by both the operator and players. The Commission has established minimum internal control standards to aid it in monitoring class II gaming on a continuing basis.
Authorizing Statute(s):
US Code:
25 USC 2701
Name of Law: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
80 FR 32176
06/05/2015
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
80 FR 54586
09/10/2015
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
4
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
MICS 543.23(c)
MICS 543.23(d)
MICS 543.3
MICS 543.5
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
834
368
0
466
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
11,341
40,538
0
-29,197
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
8,736,040
0
0
8,736,040
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Changing Regulations
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Reduction Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Short Statement:
The Commission has made several program changes: (a) since 2012 (when the previous burden estimates were approved), the Commission has amended its regulations to require a TGRA to submit a notice to the Commission that it is extending the deadline (by an additional six months) to achieve compliance with the requirements of the new tier after a gaming operation has moved from one tier to another. This program change, however, did not significantly impact the Commission's estimated burdens, as it only increased the estimated annual responses by one response, and the estimated burden hours by one hour; (b) since 2012, the Commission has amended its regulations to require a TGRA to submit a detailed report after the TGRA has approved an alternate standard to any of the NIGC MICS. This program change had an impact on the Commission's estimated burdens, as it increased the estimated annual responses by one response, and the estimated burden hours by 108 hours; (c) the Commission did not previously include the hourly burden estimates for certain recordkeeping functions (ยง 543.23(c)), as it previously considered them customary and usual business practices. However, the Commission is now including the burdens for these recordkeeping and administrative functions because, while most gaming operations would probably maintain certain of these records, it is possible that not every operation would do so according to the standards set forth in the NIGC regulations; and (d) the Commission has changed the manner in how it reports some of the burden estimates for this collection. Specifically, the Commission previously reported how many hours it might take an independent CPA to perform an AUP assessment and complete a report. However, tribes are not allowed to submit AUP assessment reports that they have themselves completed, but are instead required by NIGC regulations to engage outside, independent CPAs. Thus, the Commission is now only reporting the estimated burden hours that it takes a tribe and/or TGRA to submit two copies of the AUP assessment report to the Commission, as well as the estimated annual dollar cost that the tribes will have to pay to engage independent CPAs to perform AUP assessments of approximately 416 gaming operations. The Commission has made the following adjustments to its estimated burdens: (a) the Commission has increased the number of estimated annual responses from 368 to 834. This is based on a combination of the above-mentioned program changes; (b) the Commission has decreased the number of estimated annual burden hours from 40,538 to 11,341. This is based on a combination of the above-mentioned program changes; and (c) the Commission has increased the estimated annual cost burden from $0 to $8,736,040. This is based on a combination of the above-mentioned program changes.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$35,636
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Armando Acosta 202 632-7003 armando_acosta@nigc.gov
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
09/21/2015