View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View Generic ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
1024-0224
ICR Reference No:
201510-1024-001
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
201408-1024-002
Agency/Subagency:
DOI/NPS
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Programmatic Clearance Process for NPS-Sponsored Public Surveys
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved with change
Conclusion Date:
05/10/2016
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
10/30/2015
Terms of Clearance:
This programmatic collection of information is approved to facilitate the NPS Social Science Program. As such, the agency has adopted practices that are consistent with the 2008 Terms of Clearance, including the use of the “Pool of Known Questions” and the restrictions on the use of the stated preference or stated choice techniques to value non-market goods. OMB concurs with such practices. Further, OMB advises that any substantial changes to the “Pool of Known Questions” and methods allowed under this collection be conducted during the regular 3-year review cycle since this collection is reserved for only non-controversial, non-policy relevant, and non-programmatic areas of inquiry. The agency is reminded that it may not proceed with any specific survey unless it receives affirmative notice from OMB. OMB strives to meet the expedited review schedule requested by the agency in this submission. During the next submission, OMB requests that NPS provide the total number of unique questions that are approved under this collection.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
05/31/2019
36 Months From Approved
05/31/2016
Responses
124,500
0
53,500
Time Burden (Hours)
33,849
0
17,080
Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
Abstract:
The National Park Service (NPS) is requesting a three-year extension of its Programmatic Clearance for NPS-Sponsored Public Surveys, originally approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in August 1998. The Programmatic Clearance enables NPS to conduct research through external standard social science research methods (e.g., questionnaires, focus groups, interviews, etc.). This information has historically been collected to inform and improve the services and products that NPS provides to the public and thus better carry out part of its statutory mission.
Authorizing Statute(s):
US Code:
42 USC 102
Name of Law: National Environmental Policy Act of 1982
PL:
Pub.L. 103 - 62 IIa1 and IIb1
Name of Law: The Government Performance and Results Act
EO: EO 12862 Name/Subject of EO: Setting Customer Service Standards
EO: EO 13571 Name/Subject of EO: Streamlining Service Delivery and Improving Customer Service
US Code:
16 USC 1a.7
Name of Law: National Park Service Organic Act of 1916
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
80 FR 30720
05/29/2015
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
80 FR 66932
10/30/2015
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
Yes
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
71
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
2017 Visitor User and Experience in Denali's Backcountry
A Survey of Tick Borne Disease Prevention at Acadia National Park (ACAD)
Analysis of Interpretive Programs in Grand Teton National Park
Bryce Canon Transportation Survey (Resubmitted)
CASA and FOMA Visitor Experience Studies
Cape Lookout Community Interviews
Cape Lookout Visitor Survey
Castillo de San Marcos Visitor Experience and Community Study
Cumberland Island National Seashore Visitor Survey
Denali National Park and Preserve Paleontological Resource Management Study (Interviews)
Denali National Park and Preserve Paleontological Resource Management Study (Survey)
Denali Winter Roads and Trails Survey
Ethnographic interviews of ranching and agriculture on Capitol Reef National Park (CARE)
Evaluating Visitor Preferences for Social Media and Access to Technology at Shenandoah National Park
Evaluating Visitor's Temporal and Spatial Distribution and Service Level Satisfaction at Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve (TAPR)
Evaluation of Visitor Characteristics Across and Within Seasons at Joshua Tree National Park (JOTR)
Gateway National Recreation Area 2017 Law Enforcement Survey
Gateway National Recreation Area Visitor Use Study
Glacier Bay National Park Back country/Wilderness Visitor Use Study: Back county Surveys
Glacier Bay National Park Backcountry/Wilderness Visitor Use Study
Glen Canyon, Capital Reef, and Grand Staircase Escalante Visitor Use and Experience Study
Golden Gate National Recreation Area Visitor Use Survey: On-site survey
Golden Gate National Recreation Area Visitor Use Survey: Telephone Survey
Grand Teton National Park Qualitative Interview for String and Leigh Lakes 2017
Grand Teton National Park:Qualitative Interviews for String and Leigh Lakes 2017
Great Sand Dunes National Park Backcountry Visitor Use Study - On-site Survey
Hot Springs National Park Visitor Use Study (HOSP)
Impacts of Sound on Visitors' Experience in Denali National Park Front-Country (DENA)
Improving communications with day hikers about bear-safety in Yellowstone National Park.
Jenny Lake Visitor Experience Study (JELA)
Jimmy Carter National Historic Site Visitor Use Study II
Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area visitor study
Lighting and night skies in Grand Teton National Park
Monitoring Horseback Rider and Hiker Use at Ozark National Scenic Riverways
NPS Bat Caves Survey
NPS Bridging the Watershed Partnership Program
NPS Socioeconomic Monitoring Program (SEM1.0)
National Capital Region (NCR) Visitor Use and Transportation Study at Six NCR Units
River and landing preferences among St Croix National Scenic Riverway visitors
Road noise reduction survey in Death Valley National Park
Rocky Mountain National Park Backcountry Visitor Study: Hikers and Anglers
San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park Visitor Use Study
Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area (SAMO) Recreational Trail use Survey
Shenandoah National Park Old Rag Mountain Visitor Use Study
Study of Media Perceptions and Usage In Yellowstone National Park
Understanding Visitors to Brown v Board of Education National Historic Site
Visitor Experience in Jimmy Carter National Historic Site (JICA)
Visitor Preferences for Social Media and Access to Technology at Theodore Roosevelt National Park
Visitor Survey At Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area (DEWA)
Visitor Survey in the Moose-Wilson Corridor of the Grand Teton National Park
Visitor Survey in the Moose-Wilson Corridor of the Grand Teton National Park - on-site survey
Visitor Use Management Planning at Theodore Roosevelt National Park
Visitor Use Study at the Flagstaff Area National Monuments (FLAG)
Visitor Use Survey for the Rim to Rim Corridor at Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA)
Visitor Use and Threshold Testing at Theodore Roosevelt National Park (THRO)
Visitor experiences at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore - Miners Beach and Sand Point
Visitor perceptions of human-moose (Alces alces) interactions in Isle Royale National Park
Visitor use at Buffalo River National River (BUFF)
Visitor use at String and Leigh Lakes Area of Grand Teton National Park: Drivers
Visitor use at String and Leigh Lakes Area of Grand Teton National Park: Recreational Users
Visitor use surveys at Arches National Park and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area
Visitor use surveys at Eisenhower National Historic Site and Gettysburg National Military Park
Visitor's experience climbing in Grand Teton National Park (GRTE)
Visual Resources Visitor Study Focus Groups
Wind Cave National Park (WICA) Visitor Use Survey
Wrangell-St. Elias Backcountry Monitoring Study
Yellowstone Backcountry Hiker Survey
Yellowstone National Park Visitor-Bison Survey
Yellowstone Summer Visitor Use Survey: Geofencing and On-site Surveys
Yosemite National Park Visitor Use Study - Mail back Survey
Zion National Park Visitor Use Study
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
124,500
53,500
0
0
71,000
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
33,849
17,080
0
0
16,769
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
The numbers show a burden increase because this is a three-year request and the burden thus is for three years of surveys via our generic clearance program, whereas the previous request/approval was for only one year. However, the actual annual burden is estimated to decrease because we expect to have fewer survey submissions per year over the next three years, in part, due to the ending of our contract with the Visitor Service Project (VSP) at the University of Idaho.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$1,525,780
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
Yes
Part B of Supporting Statement
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Phadrea Ponds 970 226-9445 pondsp@usgs.gov
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
10/30/2015