View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0648-0515
ICR Reference No:
201512-0648-010
Status:
Historical Inactive
Previous ICR Reference No:
201512-0648-007
Agency/Subagency:
DOC/NOAA
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Alaska Interagency Electronic Reporting System (IERS)
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Comment filed on proposed rule and continue
Conclusion Date:
02/01/2016
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
12/29/2015
Terms of Clearance:
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, OMB is withholding approval at this time. Prior to publication of the final rule, the agency must submit to OMB a summary of all comments related to the information collection contained in the proposed rule and the agency response. The agency should clearly indicate any changes made to the information collection as a result of these comments.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
11/30/2017
11/30/2017
11/30/2017
Responses
71,299
0
71,299
Time Burden (Hours)
25,588
0
25,588
Cost Burden (Dollars)
4,765
0
4,765
Abstract:
The Interagency Electronic Reporting System (IERS) is the result of a partnership between NMFS, Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G), and International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC). IERS minimizes the burden and maximizes the utility of fisheries information created, collected, maintained, used, disseminated, and retained. This action requires that the operator of a catcher/processor placed in the partial observer coverage category submit a catcher/processor landing report, a new reporting requirement. The landing report would be generated through eLandings by consolidating the daily production reports for the period the vessel operator defines as the fishing trip for purposes of observer coverage.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 94 - 265 303
Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Management and Conservation Act
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
0648-BF36
Proposed rulemaking
80 FR 81262
12/29/2015
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
8
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Alaska Interagency Electronic Reporting System - Registration
NA
eLandings Registration
Catcher vessel eLog (new)
Catcher vessel eLogbooks pilot
NA
Catcher vessel eLog
Catcher/processor electronic logbook (eLog)
Catcher/processor landing report
NA
IERS catcher/processor landing report
Mothership eLog
eLandings Production Report
eLandings/seaLandings Landing Report
NA, NA, NA
Manual landing report
,
out of state landing report
,
Crab rationalization manual landing report
tlandings (previously buying station report)
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Changing Regulations
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
Changes: This action requires that the operator of a catcher/processor placed in the partial observer coverage category submit a catcher/processor landing report, a new reporting requirement. The landing report would be generated through eLandings by consolidating the daily production reports for the period the vessel operator defines as the fishing trip for purposes of observer coverage. Catcher/processor landing report (NEW) an increase of 9 respondents and responses, 9 instead of 0 an increase of 5 hours burden, 5 hr instead of 0 an increase of $185 personnel costs, $185 instead of $0 Adjustments: Adjustments are made due to changes in participants. IERS Processor registration a decrease of 7 respondents and responses, 12 instead of 19 a decrease of 2 hours burden, 3 instead of 5 a decrease of $74 personnel costs, $111 instead of $185 a decrease of $4 miscellaneous costs, $6 instead of $10 eLandings/seaLandings Landing report a decrease of 44 respondents, 95 instead of 139 a decrease of 1,198 responses, 20,425 instead of 21,623 a decrease of 9,209 hours burden, 3,404 instead of 12,613 a decrease of $340,733 personnel costs, $125,948 instead of $466,681 a decrease of $1,141 miscellaneous costs, $1,021 instead of $2,162 eLandings Production report a decrease of 57 respondents,189 instead of 246 a decrease of 1,500 responses, 24,426 instead of 25,926 a decrease of 4,806 hours burden, 2,036 instead of 6,842 a decrease of $177,822 personnel costs, $75,332 instead of $253,154 a decrease of $1,372 miscellaneous costs, $1,221 instead of $2,593 Catcher/processor eLog an increase of 17 respondents, 94 instead of 77 an increase of 3,451 responses, 19,082 instead of 15,631 an increase of 855 hours burden, 4,724 hr instead of 3,869 an increase of $31,635 personnel costs, $174,788 instead of $143,153 An extra catcher vessel eLog had been included in ROCIS at some point. The only such eLog is the pilot CV eLog. This correction removed 148 responses and 35 hours.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$63,825
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Patsy Bearden 907 586-7008
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
12/29/2015