View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
3150-0163
ICR Reference No:
201601-3150-001
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
201212-3150-005
Agency/Subagency:
NRC
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Cooperation with States at Commerical Nuclear Power Plants and Other Nuclear Production and Utilization Facilities, Policy Statement
Type of Information Collection:
Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
03/09/2016
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
02/02/2016
Terms of Clearance:
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for three years. As terms of clearance, NRC is asked to provide a more robust explanation of how it has estimated the number of responses and annual burden.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
03/31/2019
36 Months From Approved
03/31/2016
Responses
213
0
70
Time Burden (Hours)
1,380
0
1,000
Cost Burden (Dollars)
25,800
0
166,600
Abstract:
States and Tribes are involved and interested in monitoring the safety status of nuclear power plants and radioactive materials. This involvement is, in part, in response to the States’ and Tribes’ public health and safety responsibilities and, in part, in response to their citizens’ desire to become more knowledgeable about the safety of nuclear power plants and radioactive materials. States have identified NRC inspections as one possible source of knowledge for their personnel regarding plant and materials licensee activities, and the NRC, through the policy statement on Cooperation with States, has been amenable to accommodating the States’ needs in this regard. Additionally, the NRC has been able to accommodate Tribal interests in the same way. The NRC has also entered into reimbursable Agreements with certain States under Section 274i of the Act, as amended, to employ their resources to conduct radioactive materials security inspections against NRC Orders.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 83 - 703 1-311
Name of Law: Atomic Energy Act
US Code:
42 USC 2011-2059
Name of Law: Atomic Energy Act
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
80 FR 51847
08/26/2015
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
81 FR 4681
01/27/2016
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
1
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Cooperation with States at Commerical Nuclear Power Plants and Other Nuclear Production and Utilization Facilities, Policy Statement
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
213
70
0
0
143
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
1,380
1,000
0
0
380
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
25,800
166,600
0
0
-140,800
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
The overall burden will increase by 380 hours from 1,000 hours to 1,380 hours. The estimated burden for the reimbursable materials security inspections has decreased. It is expected that there will be fewer States conducting reimbursable inspections and fewer inspections. States will be implementing regulations that are compatible to 10 CFR Part 37, “Physical protection of category 1 and category 2 quantities of radioactive material,” or other legally binding requirements and will not be conducting reimbursable inspections of their licensees. New reimbursable agreements are possible for future NRC security orders, but new reimbursable agreements are not expected. The estimated burden for States observing or participating in inspections at nuclear power plants and other nuclear production and utilization facilities has increased from 500 hours to 1299 hours. The change in the estimated burden is from the staff’s re-estimate of the burden and from information provided by respondents. The re-estimate reflects a change in the number of respondents from 50 to 36, based on the location of nuclear power plants and other production and utilization facilities. Most States, and the one participating Tribe, observe inspections. The re-estimate of the burden also includes changes in the number of responses and the burden per response to reflect the increased burden associated with a State having a State Resident Engineer. Exhibit 3 in the Directive Handbook attached to Management Directive 5.2, “Cooperation with States at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants and Other Nuclear Production or Utilization Facilities,” (https://adamsxt.nrc.gov/WorkplaceXT/IBMgetContent?objectStoreName=Main._ _.Library&vsId=%7B9E1AF4CB-9778-4020-8E41- 0F093692AF27%7D&id=%7BEABADD69-D55A-4DDA-AE73- 3FC04C97E3F8%7D&objectType=document ) provides a sample memorandum of understanding between the NRC and a State to allow the State to participate in inspections. The burden associated with the information collection includes: 1) obtaining security clearances; 2) complying with licensee access requirements; 3) qualification and certification of State Resident Inspectors (i.e., the State Resident Engineers) by the State; 4) making recommendations to the NRC inspection plans; 5) submitting monthly inspection recommendations to the NRC Resident Inspector; 6) making adjustments to the State’s monthly inspection recommendations to address NRC comments; 7) providing allegations received by the State Resident Engineer to the NRC Resident Inspectors; 8) providing assistance to the NRC as the NRC addresses allegations; 9) discussing the State Resident Engineers’ inspections with the NRC Resident Inspectors; 10) informing the NRC Resident Inspectors of situations with immediate safety significance; 11) providing written reports documenting the results of inspection activities to the NRC; 12) assisting the NRC in preparing enforcement actions; 13) assisting the NRC during enforcement conferences with licensees; 14) participating in an annual meeting with the NRC to exchange information on matters of common concern pertaining to the memorandum of understanding; 15) providing press releases about the State’s activities under the memorandum of understanding to the NRC; and 16) providing the NRC with written notice before placing a State Resident Engineer at a site. The burden also reflects costs associated with: 1) training for the State Resident Engineer; 2) reimbursement to the NRC for special training; 3) obtaining the security clearance for the State Resident Engineer; 4) computer costs; 5) other office costs; and 6) fitness-for-duty costs (e.g., drug testing). Staff professional rates also changed from $274/hour to $268/hour. 16. Publication for Statistical Use.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$136,115
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
James Firth 301 415-6628 james.firth@nrc.gov
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
02/02/2016