View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View Generic ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
3145-0215
ICR Reference No:
201704-3145-002
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
201402-3145-001
Agency/Subagency:
NSF
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
06/12/2017
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
04/10/2017
Terms of Clearance:
OMB approves this collection for a period of three years. To request approval of information collections under this generic approval, the agency must do the following: 1) Unless an agency is using multiple modes of collection (e.g., paper forms and electronic submissions), provide a Generic Clearance Submission Template for each Instrument; 2) If the agency is using multiple modes of collection (e.g., paper forms and electronic submissions), the same Generic Clearance Submission Template may be used for both instruments; 3) each Generic Clearance Submission Template must be uploaded as a Supplementary document using a naming convention that allows the public to identify the associated instrument; 4) submit no more than five Generic Submission Templates with each request.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
06/30/2020
36 Months From Approved
06/30/2017
Responses
70,000
0
40,000
Time Burden (Hours)
20,000
0
12,500
Cost Burden (Dollars)
75,000
0
75,000
Abstract:
This collection of information is necessary to enable NSF to garner customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely manner, in accordance with our commitment to improving service delivery. The information collected from our customers and stakeholders will help ensure that users have an effective, efficient, and satisfying experience with the Agency's programs.
Authorizing Statute(s):
EO: EO 12862 Name/Subject of EO: Setting Customer Service Standards
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
81 FR 72619
10/20/2016
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
82 FR 17296
04/10/2017
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
68
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Request for Feedback on Submission Process for the NSF Convergence Accelerator Pilot Program
2019 NSF PI/SPO Customer Feedback Survey
AUDIENCE FEEDBACK AND PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM
Arches Focus Group Survey: Areas of Interest for the South Pole Station Master Plan (SPSMP)
Aviation Focus Group Survey: Areas of Interest for the South Pole Station Master Plan (SPSMP)
Building Lift Focus Group Survey: Areas of Interest for the South Pole Station Master Plan (SPSMP)
Building Minority-Serving Institution-Led Coalitions to Strengthen Broadening Participation in Engineering Survey
Center-based Research Program Interviews
Center-based Research Program Site Visitor Interview Pretest
Collection of planning and satisfaction data with participants at the May 29-30, 2019 NSF INCLUDES National Network Meeting
Customer Satisfaction Survey for the NSF Electronic Research Administration Forum
Customer Satisfaction Survey for the NSF Electronic Research Administration Forum, April 10, 2019
Customer Satisfaction Survey for the NSF Electronic Research Administration Forum, April 12, 2018
Customer Satisfaction Survey for the NSF Electronic Research Administration Forum, May 14, 2020
Customer Satisfaction Survey for the NSF Electronic Research Administration Forum, September 26, 2018
Dear Colleague Letter – Seeking Community Input for Topic Ideas to inform planning by the Office of International Science and Engineering at the National Science Foundation
December 2-5, 2019 Post-Training and Coaching Online Satisfaction Survey Convergence Accelerator (C-Accel)
Executive Summary Form: Receive Feedback Before Completing Your Proposal
Feedback Survey Regarding NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I Proposal Submission Process
Feedback on the Science and Engineering Indicators (SEI) website
Focus Groups for Moving the Needle: Advancing Girls in Engineering
Focus group for National Science Foundation (NSF) Centers for Chemical Innovation (CCI) Program Grantees
General South Pole Station Master Plan (SPSMP) Charrette Topic Identification Survey
Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy and Water Systems (INFEWS) PI Workshop Survey
Input from the Antarctic research community to the Antarctic Science Contract (ASC) regarding community preferences in equipment selection
Input from the arctic research community to the NSF's Arctic Science Section (ARC) Portfolio Review Committee
Merit Review Orientation Video Feedback Survey
NSF Centers for Chemical Innovation Interview Protocols Pretest
NSF Centers for Chemical Innovation Survey Pre-tests
NSF Convergence Accelerator PI Workshop Survey, February 2020
NSF Funding Pages Redesign Customer Satisfaction Survey
NSF INCLUDES Cohort 2 Design and Development Launch Pilot Project Principal Investigators and Evaluators
NSF INCLUDES Conference Document/Data Request
NSF INCLUDES Customer Satisfaction Survey
NSF INCLUDES Principal Investigator's Meeting Feedback Form
NSF Information Collection from Research & Related Activities Awardees
NSF Science Community Outreach Survey
NSF Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) Survey
NSF.gov User Research for Site Redesign
National Science Board Website (nsf.gov/nsb) User Survey
National Science Foundation Website Redesign Usability Testing
October 1-4, 2019 Post-Training Online Satisfaction Survey Convergence Accelerator (C-Accel)
Phone Interviews with NSF INCLUDES Design and Development Launch Pilot (DDLP) Principal Investigators
Pilot test the exit survey of participants in the National Science Foundation (NSF) Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Program
Post-Boot Camp Survey Questions for Community College Innovation Challenge Participants - 2018
Post-Boot Camp Survey Questions for Community College Innovation Challenge Participants, Part 2 - 2017
Post-Meeting Survey for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Virtual Listening Meetings
Pre-Boot Camp Survey Questions for Community College Innovation Challenge Participants - 2018
Pre-Boot Camp Survey Questions for Community College Innovation Challenge Participants, Part 2 - 2017
Principal investigator web-survey to gauge their interest in participating in the pilot-testing a tracking system for REU site students
Questionnaire and Small Group Discussion for National Science Foundation (NSF) Water, Sustainability, and Climate (WSC) Program Grantees
Remote Panelist Experience Survey
Requirements for U.S. Antarctic Program Research Vessels
Research.gov Proposal Preparation Site Survey
Retrospective Survey of Participants in the National Science Foundation (NSF) International Research Experiences for Students (IRES) Program
Review of NSF INCLUDES Technical Assistance-Survey and Focus Groups
SBIR/STTR Submission Process (for Applicants)
SURVEY FOR DIVISION OF UNDERGRADUATE OUTREACH ACTIVITIES
Satisfaction Surveys for SBIR/STTR Pre-submission Process (for Proposers and Reviewers)
Satisfaction of Applicants (Principal Investigators) and Reviewers with NSF's Merit Review Process
Sectors Focus Group Survey: Areas of Interest for the South Pole Station Master Plan (SPSMP)
Survey for Division of Industrial Innovation and Partnerships Conferences
USAP.gov Customer Feedback Survey
Usability-testing of a Tracking System for Research Experiences for Undergraduate Site Students
User Interviews for the NSF IUCRC Redesign Project
User Interviews for the NSF IUCRC Redesign Project
User Survey for Extreme Light Infrastructure
Utilities Focus Group Survey: Areas of Interest for the South Pole Station Master Plan (SPSMP)
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
70,000
40,000
0
30,000
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
20,000
12,500
0
7,500
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
75,000
75,000
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
The burden increase is due to an increase in the number of surveys requested.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$10,000
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
Yes
Part B of Supporting Statement
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Suzanne Plimpton
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
04/10/2017
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
The site is secure.
