View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View Generic ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
0704-0553
ICR Reference No:
201909-0704-011
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
201902-0704-006
Agency/Subagency:
DOD/DODDEP
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Fast Track Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery
Type of Information Collection:
No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
10/01/2019
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
10/01/2019
Terms of Clearance:
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
03/31/2022
03/31/2022
03/31/2022
Responses
1,200,000
0
300,000
Time Burden (Hours)
300,000
0
50,000
Cost Burden (Dollars)
8,268,000
0
1,378,000
Abstract:
Executive Order 12862 directs Federal agencies to provide service to the public that matches or exceeds the best service available in the private sector. In order to work continuously to ensure that our programs are effective and meet our customers’ needs, the Department of Defense (hereafter “the Agency”) seeks to obtain OMB approval of a generic clearance to collect qualitative feedback on our service delivery. By qualitative feedback we mean information that provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be generalized to the population of study.
Authorizing Statute(s):
EO: EO 12862
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
83 FR 61151
11/28/2018
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
84 FR 4451
02/15/2019
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
94
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
$ense Beta Testing
$ense Summative Testing
637th Training Group (TRG)/Defense Language Institute English Language Center (DLIELC) Graduate Survey
637th Training Group (TRG)/Defense Language Institute English Language Center (DLIELC) Graduate Survey
AFN Now Satisfaction Surveys
Air Force Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Technical Training Management System (TTMS) End of Course (EOC) Survey
Air Force Combined Mishap Reduction System (AFCMRS) Maintenance Survey
American Forces Network (AFN) Audience Survey
Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) Stakeholder Focus Group Study
Army CIDC Wellness Program Survey
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Customer Usability/Acceptance
Aviano Air Force Base Where Airmen Get Information
Boat Ramp Exit Survey
Boating Survey for Lake Stakeholders
Boating Survey for Marina Tenants
CDSE Supervisor Training Evaluation Survey
CDSE Supervisor Training Evaluation Survey
CDSE Training Application Survey
CDSE eLearning Insider Threat Awareness Feedback
Case #252 - Leadership Development Program (LDP) Capstone Data Collection on Effectiveness of Developmental ISSP Program
Center for Development of Security Excellence (CDSE) Communications Survey
Center for Development of Security Excellence (CDSE) Training Application Survey
Clinical Communities Speaker Series Focus Group Activity
Clinical Support Tools Feedback Survey
Counseling on Access to Lethal Means (CALM) Annual Survey
Customer Experience with Washington Headquarters Services
Customer Satisfaction Survey of WISDOM Course Graduates
DEOC User Experience Questionnaire
DFSC Internal Training Feedback Survey
DHRA Shared Services Center Customer Experience Questionnaire
DLA Supplier Satisfaction Survey
DMDC Customer Satisfaction Surveys
DON SAPRO Summit Evaluation
DVBIC Climate Assessment
Dataminr Annual User Survey
Defense Security Service Employee Suggestion/Comment Form
Department of Navy Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office Summit Evaluation
Deputy's Workforce Council Touchpoint Survey
Diffeo Annual User Survey
Directors Employee Suggestions
DoD Hearing Center of Excellence Customer Satisfaction Survey
DoD Hearing Center of Excellence JHASIR Training Survey
DoD Issuance Training Feedback
DoD Office of Information Management Post-Webinar Survey
DoDEA Customer Satisfaction Survey - Parents and Sponsors
DoDEA Customer Satisfaction Survey - Students
DoDEA Customer Satisfaction Survey - Teachers
ESSENSE Product Survey
Enterprise Blood Management System – Donor Post Implementation Review
Evaluation of the DoD SPARX Knowledge Training Program
EventPLUS: Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program (YRRP); Breakout SMS Evaluations; During Deployment Mailer Evaluation
EventPLUS: Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program (YRRP); Topic Tree; Pre-Event Survey, Live Polling (Pre), Live Polling (Post), Post-Event Participation Evaluation
EventPLUS: Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program; Joint Service Event Evaluation
Executive Health Services Feedback Survey
F-35 ALIS Software Release Feedback Survey
FSO Learning Experience 2020
Feedback from Issuance Action Officers
ForeSee Desktop & Mobile Questionnaire
ForeSee Feedback Questionnaire
GAMECHANGER
Independent Analysis and Recommendations on Domestic Abuse (DA) in the Armed Forces: Expert Panel(s)
Independent Public Accountant (IPA) Roundtable Survey
Instructor-Led Student Learning Event Evaluation Survey
Integrated Services Division (ISD) Customer Satisfaction Survey (Kiosk)
JAIC Infrastructure & Platform (JCF) Customer Satisfaction Surveys
JCF CONOPS Survey
Joint Medical Simulation Instructional/Operational Methods (JMedSIM) Field Survey for Simulation Facilitators and Simulation Operators
Legacy Help Desk Customer Satisfaction Survey
MEPS Customer Satisfaction Survey
Military Health Service (MHS) Information Portal (MIP) User Satisfaction and Feedback Survey
Military Health System Electronic Health Record End User Survey
Office of Military Commissions Pulse Survey
Post-Election Voting Survey of State Election Officials (SEOs)
Post-FOCI Conference Feedback
Pre-FOCI Conference Feedback
Recorded Future Annual User Survey
Regional Discussion Follow Up Evaluation
Regulations Team Training Course Feedback Survey
Resident Bill of Rights Review
Scientific Test and Analysis Techniques Center of Excellence (STAT COE) Website Use-Purpose Data
Silo Annual User Survey
Socium User Satisfaction Survey (Baseline)
Soliciting Feedback for A&S Satisfaction with JSP Services
SpeakersNSA - After-Action Report
State of Strategy Conference Questionnaire
Survivability Seminar Series Survey
TRICARE Award Fee Provider Survey
Tenant Satisfaction Survey DoD Privatized, Government-Owned and Government-Leased Housing
Transportation Pay Customer Service Survey
USTRANSCOM Joint Training Assessment Survey
VILT Student Learning Event Evaluation Survey
WHS Customer Experience Quarterly Survey
Webinar Student Learning Event Evaluation Survey
eLearning Student Learning Event Evaluation Survey
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
1,200,000
300,000
0
900,000
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
300,000
50,000
0
250,000
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
8,268,000
1,378,000
0
6,890,000
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
DoD is standardizing customer satisfaction surveys.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$185,368
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
Yes
Part B of Supporting Statement
Does this ICR request any personally identifiable information (see
OMB Circular No. A-130
for an explanation of this term)? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.
No
Does this ICR include a form that requires a Privacy Act Statement (see
5 U.S.C. §552a(e)(3)
)? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Reginald Lucas 571 372-0403 reginald.t.lucas2.ctr@mail.mil
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
10/01/2019