View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
1902-0263
ICR Reference No:
201910-1902-001
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
201607-1902-001
Agency/Subagency:
FERC
Agency Tracking No:
FERC-725M
Title:
FERC-725M, Mandatory Reliability Standard: FAC-003-4, Vegetation Management
Type of Information Collection:
Reinstatement without change of a previously approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Emergency
Approval Requested By:
10/08/2019
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
11/04/2019
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
10/08/2019
Terms of Clearance:
OMB approves 3 months of an extension request while FERC works to reinstates this collection for the full 3 years.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
02/29/2020
12/31/2019
Responses
510
0
0
Time Burden (Hours)
2,296
0
0
Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
Abstract:
As stated by NERC in its Petition (dated 3/14/2016 [footnotes omitted]) in Docket No. RD16-4, “[t]he purpose of proposed Reliability Standard FAC-003-4 is to require entities to manage vegetation located on transmission rights of way (ROW) and minimize encroachments from vegetation located adjacent to the ROW to reduce the risk of vegetation-related outages that could lead to Cascading. Proposed Reliability Standard FAC-003-4 reflects revisions developed under Project 2010-07.1 Vegetation Management to provide a revised gap factor applied in the Gallet equation supporting the appropriate Alternating Current Minimum Vegetation Clearance Distances (referred to herein as “MVCD values”) stated under the Reliability Standard. The MVCD value reflects the minimum distance between vegetation and conductors to prevent a flash-over. This revised gap factor was developed as a result of the 2015 Technical Report prepared by EPRI entitled Supplemental Testing to Confirm or Refine Gap Factor Utilized in Calculation of Minimum Vegetation Clearance Distances (“MVCD”): Tests: Results and Analysis (“EPRI Report”) filed at the Commission in Docket No. RM12-4-000 in compliance with the Commission’s directive in Order No. 777. The EPRI Report, the preliminary report preceding it, and EPRI’s recent update to the EPRI Report filed in Docket No. RM12-4-000 are attached at Exhibit E. As reflected in this Petition and the attached exhibits, the EPRI test results indicated that MVCD values under currently effective Reliability Standard FAC-003-3 might not be suitable or sufficiently conservative in all situations. The EPRI testing revealed that the gap factor used to determine those MVCD values under the Gallet equation was too high for all situations with varying tree and conductor configurations. The gap factor is a multiplier that adjusts MVCD values for different configurations of vegetation and conductors to avoid flashover (a lower gap factor correlates to higher MVCD values). The EPRI tests thus led to the conclusion that MVCD values under existing Reliability Standard FAC-003-4 appeared low. The EPRI test results demonstrated the Gallet equation should apply a more conservative, lower, gap factor of 1.0 to calculate MVCD values for Reliability Standard FAC-003-4. Proposed Reliability Standard FAC-003-4, therefore proposes higher and more conservative MVCD values. These higher MVCD values will enhance reliability and provide additional confidence by applying a more conservative approach to determining the vegetation clearing distances.” In the Delegated Order (dated 4/26/2016) in Docket No. RD16-4, FERC approved the revised Reliability Standard proposed by NERC.
Emergency Justfication:
See the letter from FERC's General Counsel to OMB requesting reinstatement and an emergency extension of FERC-725M. The letter (dated 10/7/2019) is attached under 'Supplementary Documents.' FERC requests a 3-month Emergency Extension (to 12/31/2019, from 9/30/2019) of FERC-725M. The 60-day notice for FERC-725M was published in the Federal Register on 8/27/2019, 84 FR 44890, with a public comment period ending 10/28/2019. (It is included under Supplementary Documents.) The FERC-725M reporting and recordkeeping requirements are generally not submitted to the Commission but are prepared and retained for use by the compliance enforcement authority (NERC [the nation’s FERC-approved Electric Reliability Organization] or the Regional Entity). If that FERC-725M information were not required and available, it could jeopardize the reliability of the nation’s Bulk Power System and lead to additional sustained power outages. The Commission requires the information in the FERC-725M to implement statutory provisions of section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA). On 8/8/2005, Congress enacted the Electricity Modernization Act of 2005, which is Title XII, Subtitle A, of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005). EPAct 2005 added a new section 215 to the FPA, which requires a Commission-certified Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) to develop mandatory and enforceable Reliability Standards, which are subject to Commission review and approval. Once approved, the Reliability Standards may be enforced by the ERO subject to Commission oversight, or the Commission can independently enforce Reliability Standards. Reliability Standards developed by the ERO and approved by the Commission apply to users, owners and operators of the Bulk-Power System as set forth in each Reliability Standard. FERC-725M includes Reliability Standard FAC-003-4 (Transmission Vegetation Management). Purpose of FAC-003-4: “To maintain a reliable electric transmission system by using a defense- in-depth strategy to manage vegetation located on transmission rights of way (ROW) and minimize encroachments from vegetation located adjacent to the ROW, thus preventing the risk of those vegetation- related outages that could lead to Cascading.” Need for FAC-003-4 Data, and Risk without Data: Vegetation contact with transmission lines was a major factor in two significant blackouts (WECC territory in 1996, and the August 2003 Northeast blackout). The documentation requirements related to vegetation management requirements assists respondents to manage vegetation located on rights-of-way and minimize vegetation encroachments. The documentation further provides a way for auditors to evaluate compliance with this standard. Failure to impose the requirements could jeopardize system reliability and lead to outages in the Bulk Power System.
Authorizing Statute(s):
US Code:
16 USC 824o
Name of Law: Energy Policy Act of 2005
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
2
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
FERC-725M (RD16-4, for one-time and ongoing, with one-time averaged over Yrs. 1-3)
FERC-725M, Final Rule in RM12-16 (one-time and ongoing)
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
510
0
0
0
0
510
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
2,296
0
0
0
0
2,296
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$5,481
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Does this ICR request any personally identifiable information (see
OMB Circular No. A-130
for an explanation of this term)? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.
No
Does this ICR include a form that requires a Privacy Act Statement (see
5 U.S.C. §552a(e)(3)
)? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Dennis Fuentes-Pedrosa 202 502-6627 dennis.fuentes-pedrosa@ferc.gov
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
10/08/2019
Something went wrong when downloading this file. If you have any questions, please send an email to risc@gsa.gov.