View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package

OMB Control No: 2060-0535	ICR Reference No: 202009-2060-004
Status: Historical Inactive	Previous ICR Reference No: 201908-2060-012
Agency/Subagency: EPA/OAR	Agency Tracking No: 2115.07
Title: NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHHH) (Proposed Rule)
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR: No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Comment filed on proposed rule and continue	Conclusion Date: 02/23/2022
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)	Date Received in OIRA: 11/16/2020
Terms of Clearance: In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, OMB is filing comment and withholding approval at this time. The agency shall examine public comment in response to the proposed rulemaking and will include in the supporting statement of the next ICR--to be submitted to OMB at the final rule stage--a description of how the agency has responded to any public comments on the ICR, including comments on maximizing the practical utility of the collection and minimizing the burden.

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	01/31/2023	01/31/2023	12/31/2025
Responses	182	0	182
Time Burden (Hours)	54,600	0	54,600
Cost Burden (Dollars)	907,000	0	907,000

Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHHH applies to new and existing facilities that: 1) manufacture a miscellaneous coating (including inks, paints, or adhesives described by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 285 or 289, or North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes 3255 or 3259), and 2) are either located at, or are part of, major sources of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions, and 3) process, use, or produce HAP, and 4) are not part of an affected source under another subpart of 40 CFR Part 63. New facilities include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after April 4, 2002. As part of the RTR for the NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is not proposing to revise the emission limit requirements. The EPA is proposing to require periodic air emissions testing to measure organic HAP destruction or removal efficiency at the inlet and outlet of the add-on control device, or control device outlet concentration of organic HAP, once every 5 years for existing and new surface coating affected sources using the emission rate with add-on controls compliance option. The EPA is proposing to revise the startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) provisions of the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) rule and proposing the use of electronic data reporting for future performance test data submittals, notifications, and reports. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHHH. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any deviation from an emission limitation, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP.

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: There is an increase in the labor hours per respondent in this ICR as compared to the previous ICR. This situation is due to four considerations: 1) increased time in year one to become familiar with the amended rules, 2) increased time in year one to re-evaluating previously developed SSM record systems, 3) increased time in year one to become familiar with CEDRI and the electronic reporting form for the semiannual report, 4) increased time in years one to three for keeping records of operating hours and bypass hours; and 5) time required for conducting a performance test and reporting the results. There is an increase in the capital/startup costs as calculated. The requirement for periodic performance testing requires 12 existing facilities to conduct a performance test on 12 add-on control devices, with an estimate of one test being repeated. These facilities are not currently required to perform periodic testing as a condition of their part 70 operating permits.

View ICR - OIRA Conclusion