View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
View ICR - Agency Submission
COMMENT
Time Remaining
Days
HR
Min
Sec
OMB Control No:
3141-0004
ICR Reference No:
202511-3141-002
Status:
Received in OIRA
Previous ICR Reference No:
202206-3141-001
Agency/Subagency:
NIGC
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
Indian Gaming Management Contract Provisions
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
Date Submitted to OIRA:
12/01/2025
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
36 Months From Approved
02/28/2026
Responses
51
41
Time Burden (Hours)
620
401
Cost Burden (Dollars)
125,271
19,729
Abstract:
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act requires the National Indian Gaming Commission Chairman to review and approve all management contracts for the operation and management of class II and/or class III gaming activities, and to conduct background investigations of persons with direct or indirect financial interests in, and management responsibility for, management contracts. The Commission has promulgated parts 533, 535, and 537 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, to implement these statutory requirements.
Authorizing Statute(s):
US Code:
25 USC 2701
Name of Law: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
90 FR 45205
09/23/2025
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
90 FR 54739
11/28/2025
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
4
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Indian Gaming Management Contract Provisions 533.3
Indian Gaming Management Contract Provisions 535.1
Indian Gaming Management Contract Provisions 535.2
Indian Gaming Management Contract Provisions 537.1
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Request
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
51
41
0
0
10
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
620
401
0
0
219
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
125,271
19,729
0
0
105,542
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
Updated burden estimates are based on consultations with stakeholders and it should be cautioned at the outset that tribal gaming operations and their business practices are unique to each gaming Tribe and influenced by a variety of local, state, and regional factors. Tribal gaming facilities vary in size and complexity and range from small truck stops and lotteries to world-class casino mega-resorts. The amount of time and resources that gaming tribes expend fulfilling regulatory requirements can vary dramatically and is further complicated by different Tribal governance practices and varying levels of investment in, and adoption of, new technologies and technical expertise. For these reasons, time and cost estimates provided by a statistically insignificant group of rotating tribal consultants has limited value and it would be improper to extrapolate from these estimates any definitive trends. Overall, this collection cycle shows an increase in the number of responses and this increase in management contracting activity is understandably reflected in the increase of time and cost expenditures. In general, a certain amount of the cost increases would be due to the fact that this collection cycle coincided with a period of higher than average price increases. Also, in general, as the gaming industry matures, business contracts grow in complexity and require greater expertise and cost to assemble and review. And there are other factors that appear to have contributed to additional increases in these estimates. The increase in the Burden Hour Wage Cost estimate under part 537.1 is partly caused by the attempt that was made this cycle to capture in greater detail the full wage costs of the information collections upon high-level management executives. For example, although individual fingerprint submissions by management executives were previously overlooked and, although it may require only 2-3 hours of time per individual, because it is calculated at the wage rate of approximately $300/hour, it caused aggregate burden estimates to increase significantly. It also should be understood that, although the estimates for this cycle are higher than that of the last cycle in 2022, in looking at the broader picture, they are actually in line with – and in many cases, lower than –the estimates submitted in the 2018 cycle. For example, in comparison to the 2022 cycle, the Non-Burden Hour Cost rose 540%, however, in comparison to the 2018 cycle, this cost actually decreased 67% (from $379,480 in 2018 to the current $125,271). Finally, it should be kept in mind, as stated at the outset, that burden estimates invariably fluctuate due to the different burden experiences of the limited number of stakeholder that are consulted. For example, it may be reasonable to generalize that executives who are relatively new to gaming will often contract services to assist them through the process of collecting and submitting information for a background investigation. In contrast, seasoned executives will have already prepared such information and are familiar with the process and, therefore, may incur lower expenditures. This is to simply reiterate the observation that costs can significantly vary depending on the particular experience of the consulted individuals.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$513,900
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
No
Does this ICR request any personally identifiable information (see
OMB Circular No. A-130
for an explanation of this term)? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.
Yes
Does this ICR include a form that requires a Privacy Act Statement (see
5 U.S.C. §552a(e)(3)
)? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.
Yes
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
No
Agency Contact:
Tim Osumi 202 632-7054 tim_osumi@nigc.gov
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
12/01/2025