View Rule

View EO 12866 Meetings Printer-Friendly Version     Download RIN Data in XML

DOI/MMS RIN: 1010-AC24 Publication ID: Fall 2001 
Title: Valuation of Oil From Indian Leases 
Abstract: This rule would modify the regulations that establish royalty value for oil produced from Indian leases and create a new form for collecting value and value differential data. These changes would decrease reliance on oil posted prices and make Indian oil royalty valuation more consistent with the terms of Indian leases. 
Agency: Department of the Interior(DOI)  Priority: Other Significant 
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Stage 
Major: No  Unfunded Mandates: No 
CFR Citation: 30 CFR 206   
Legal Authority: 25 USC 2101 et seq    25 USC 396 et seq    25 USC 396a et seq    30 USC 1001 et seq    30 USC 1701 et seq    30 USC 181 et seq    30 USC 351 et seq   
Legal Deadline:  None

Statement of Need: Current oil valuation regulations rely primarily on posted prices and prices under arm's-length sales to value oil that is not sold at arm's-length. Over time, posted prices have become increasingly suspect as a fair measure of market value. This rulemaking would modify valuation regulations to place substantial reliance on the higher of crude oil spot prices major portion prices, or gross proceeds, and eliminate any direct reliance on posted prices. This rulemaking would also add more certainty to valuation of oil produced from Indian leases.

Summary of the Legal Basis: The primary legal basis for this rulemaking is the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982, as amended, which defines the Secretary of the Interior's (1) authority to implement and maintain a royalty management system for oil and gas leases on Indian lands, and (2) trust responsibility to administer Indian oil and gas resources.

Alternatives: We considered a range of valuation alternatives such as making minor adjustments to the current gross proceeds valuation method, using futures prices, using index-based prices with fixed adjustments for production from specific geographic zones, relying on some type of field pricing other than posted prices, and taking oil in-kind. We chose the higher of the average of the high daily applicable spot prices for the month major portion prices in the field or area, or gross proceeds received by the lessee or its affiliate. We chose spot prices as one of the three value measures because (1) they represent actual trading activity in the market, (2) they mirror New York Mercantile Exchange futures prices, and (3) they permit use of an index price in proximity to the actual production whose value is being measured.

Anticipated Costs and Benefits: We estimate compliance with this rulemaking would cost the oil and gas industry approximately $46,000 annually. Additional costs to industry and MMS would be up-front computer programming and other administrative costs associated with processing the new form. The benefits of this rulemaking would be an estimated $3.6 million increase in annual royalties collected on oil produced from Indian leases. Additional benefits would include simplification and increased certainty of oil pricing, reduced audit efforts, and reduced valuation determinations and associated litigation.

Risks: The risk of not modifying current oil valuation regulations is that Indian recipients may not receive royalties based on the highest price paid or offered for the major portion of oil produced--a common requirement in most Indian leases. These modifications ensure that the Department fulfills its trust responsibilities for administering Indian oil and gas leases under governing mineral leasing laws, treaties, and lease terms.

Timetable:
Action Date FR Cite
ANPRM  12/20/1995  60 FR 65610   
ANPRM Comment Period End  03/19/1996    
NPRM  02/12/1998  63 FR 7089   
NPRM Comment Period Extended  04/09/1998  63 FR 17349   
NPRM Comment Period End  05/13/1998    
Supplementary NPRM  01/05/2000  65 FR 403   
NPRM Comment Period Extended  02/28/2000  65 FR 10436   
Final Action  01/00/2002    
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes  Government Levels Affected: Tribal 
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions  Federalism: No 
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes 
Agency Contact:
Carol Shelby
Regulatory Specialist
Department of the Interior
Minerals Management Service
MS 320B2, P.O. Box 25165,
Denver, CO 80225-0165
Phone:303 231-3191
Fax:303 231-3385
Email: carol.shelby@mms.gov