View Rule
| View EO 12866 Meetings | Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML |
| DHS/TSA | RIN: 1652-AA61 | Publication ID: Fall 2015 |
| Title: Standardized Vetting, Adjudication, and Redress Services | |
|
Abstract:
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) intends to propose new regulations to revise and standardize the procedures, adjudication criteria, and fees for most of the security threat assessments (STA) of individuals for which TSA is responsible. The scope of the rulemaking will include transportation workers who are required to undergo an STA, including surface, maritime, and aviation workers. TSA will comply with certain vetting-related requirements of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act, Pub. L. 110-53 (Aug.3, 2007). TSA will propose fees to cover the cost of all STAs. TSA plans to improve the processing of STAs and streamline existing regulations by simplifying language and removing redundancies. TSA will propose revisions to the Alien Flight Student Program (AFSP) regulations. TSA published an interim final rule for AFSP on September 20, 2004. TSA regulations require aliens seeking to train at Federal Aviation Administration-regulated flight schools to complete an application and undergo an STA prior to beginning flight training. There are four categories under which students currently fall; the nature of the STA depends on the student's category. TSA is considering changes to the AFSP that would improve the equity among fee payers and enable the implementation of new technologies to support vetting. |
|
| Agency: Department of Homeland Security(DHS) | Priority: Economically Significant |
| RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda | Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-Term Actions |
| Major: Yes | Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined |
| CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations.) | |
| Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 114, 5103A, 44903 and 44936 46 U.S.C. 70105 6 U.S.C. 469 Pub. L. 110-53, secs 1411, 1414, 1520, 1522 and 1531 | |
|
Legal Deadline:
None |
||||||
|
Statement of Need: TSA proposes to meet the requirements of 6 U.S.C. 469, which requires TSA to fund security threat assessment and credentialing activities through user fees. The proposed rulemaking should reduce reliance on appropriations for certain vetting services; minimize redundant background checks; and increase transportation security by enhancing identification and immigration verification standards. |
||||||
|
Summary of the Legal Basis: 49 U.S.C. 114(f): Under the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (ATSA) (Pub. L. 170-71, Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 597), TSA assumed responsibility to assess security in all modes of transportation and minimize threats to national and transportation security. TSA is required to vet certain aviation workers pursuant to statute. TSA is required to vet individuals with unescorted access to maritime facilities pursuant to the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) (Pub. L. 107-295, sec. 102, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2064), codified at 46 U.S.C. 70105. Pursuant to the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA PATRIOT Act) (Pub. L. 107-56, Oct. 25, 2001, 115 Stat. 272), TSA vets individuals seeking hazardous materials endorsements (HME) for commercial drivers licensed by the States. TSA is required to vet certain public transportation, railroad, and over-the-road bus workers under the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act, Pub. L. 110-53 (Aug. 3, 2007). In 6 U.S.C. 469, Congress directed TSA to fund vetting and credentialing programs in the field of transportation through user fees. |
||||||
|
Alternatives: TSA considered a number of viable alternatives to the proposed regulation. These alternatives are discussed in detail in the proposed rule and regulatory impact analysis. |
||||||
|
Anticipated Costs and Benefits: TSA is in the process determining the costs and benefits of this proposed rulemaking. |
||||||
|
Risks: |
||||||
Timetable:
|
| Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes | Government Levels Affected: Undetermined |
| Small Entities Affected: Businesses | Federalism: Undetermined |
| Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes | |
| RIN Data Printed in the FR: Yes | |
| Related RINs: Related to 1652-AA35 | |
|
Agency Contact: Chang Ellison Branch Manager, Program Initiatives Branch Department of Homeland Security Transportation Security Administration Office of Intelligence and Analysis, TSA-10, HQ E6, 601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598-6010 Phone:571 227-3604 Email: chang.ellison@tsa.dhs.gov Monica Grasso Ph.D. Manager, Economic Analysis Branch-Cross Modal Division Department of Homeland Security Transportation Security Administration Office of Security Policy and Industry Engagement, 601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598-6028 Phone:571 227-3329 Email: monica.grasso@tsa.dhs.gov John Vergelli Senior Counsel, Regulations and Security Standards Department of Homeland Security Transportation Security Administration Chief Counsel's Office, 601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598-6002 Phone:571 227-4416 Email: john.vergelli@tsa.dhs.gov |
|
An official website of the United States government



