View Rule

View EO 12866 Meetings Printer-Friendly Version     Download RIN Data in XML

EPA/SWER RIN: 2050-AE01 Publication ID: Fall 1997 
Title: Revised Standards for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities 
Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) strategy for hazardous waste minimization and combustion and a judicial settlement agreement commit EPA to upgrade its standards for burning hazardous waste in incinerators, boilers, and industrial furnaces. These standards would be applicable during the construction and operation of these combustion facilities. 
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)  Priority: Economically Significant 
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Stage 
Major: Yes  Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined 
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60    40 CFR 63    40 CFR 260    40 CFR 261    40 CFR 264    40 CFR 265    40 CFR 266    40 CFR 270    40 CFR 271   
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6924    Resource Conservation Recovery Act sec 3004    42 USC 6925    Resource Conservation Recovery Act sec 3005    Clean Air Act sec 112    Clean Air Act sec 114   
Legal Deadline:
Action Source Description Date
Final  Judicial  Settlement agreement: industrial furnaces & incinerators 4/98 - boilers 12/99.  04/00/1998 

Statement of Need: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990, EPA is required to establish National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for most hazardous waste combustors (HWCs) (i.e., incinerators, cement kilns, boilers, and some types of smelting furnaces). In addition, under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), EPA is required to establish standards for all HWCs as necessary to ensure protection of human health and the environment. EPA is concerned that its current RCRA standards for HWCs may not be adequately protective given that the standards do not take into account indirect pathways of exposure and that there have been advances both in risk assessment and control technologies since promulgation of the current standards. ^PConsequently, the Agency plans to establish new emissions standards for HWCs under joint CAA and RCRA authority. This will avoid duplicative Agency effort and piecemeal regulation of the hazardous waste combustion industry.

Alternatives: Under provisions of the CAA, the Agency plans to consider the cost-effectiveness of emission limits more stringent than the minimum limits mandated by the statute. Further, the Agency plans to evaluate approaches to reduce emissions of hazardous air pollutants by improving good operating practices (e.g., controlling the way in which problematic materials such as toxic metals are introduced into the combustor).

Anticipated Costs and Benefits: EPA's analysis of the proposed rule indicates that some combustion facilities may experience a substantial change in the cost of burning waste, but that this change is likely to have a limited impact on combustion markets. In terms of effects on waste-burning cost structure, cement kilns and lightweight aggregate kilns (LWAKs) are most affected by the regulation. This is primarily a product of their relatively low baseline costs of burning, meaning that incremental compliance costs represent a large increase in their overall cost of burning waste. For incinerators, compliance costs are lower, represent smaller additions to baseline costs, and change little across regulatory options. The analysis concludes that cement kilns have the lowest waste burning costs even after regulation, and so will continue to have the greatest flexibility in marketing their services. ^PTo the extent that compliance costs cannot be passed through to generators and fuel blenders, the profitability of waste burning in kilns will fall. Nonetheless, waste burning kilns are expected to have healthy operating profit margins after the rule. Market exit in all sectors is concentrated among facilities that burn small quantities of hazardous waste. While as many as 98 combustion facilities may stop burning hazardous wastes as a result of the proposed MACT options, the small quantities these facilities burn suggest that market dislocations will be minor. ^POverall, the social costs of the rule are balanced by a set of potentially substantial benefits. Given the severity of the potential adverse health effects from dioxin and mercury (cancer, adverse developmental effects in children, severe neurological effects in adults, and bioaccumulation in ecosystems), EPA believes the substantial reductions of these pollutants from hazardous waste burning sources under the MACT standard justifies moving ahead with the proposed beyond the floor (BTF) option. An alternative way of valuing benefits is the potential increase in property values around closed or more stringently regulated combustion facilities. The fact that this approach also suggests potentially substantial benefits strengthens EPA's belief that the costs of moving forward with the proposed BTF option for certain pollutants and/or source categories are justified.

Risks: EPA has estimated that hazardous waste incinerators and hazardous-waste burning cement and light weight aggregate kilns currently emit a total of 0.94kg toxicity equivalent (TEQ) of TCDD and TCDF (isomers of dioxin) per year. Therefore, hazardous waste burning sources represent about 9 percent of total anthropogenic emissions of dioxins in the U.S. ^PEPA estimates that dioxin emissions from hazardous waste-burning sources will be reduced to 0.07kg TEQ per year at the floor levels and to 0.01kg TEQ per year at the proposed beyond the floor standard. These reductions would result in decreases of approximately 8 and 9 percent, respectively, in total estimated anthropogenic U.S. emissions. EPA expects that reductions in dioxin emissions from hazardous waste-burning sources, in conjunction with reductions in emissions from other dioxin-emitting sources, will help reduce dioxin levels over time in foods used for human consumption and, therefore, reduce the likelihood of adverse health effects, including cancer, occurring in the general population. ^PEPA has estimated that hazardous waste incinerators and hazardous waste-burning cement and lightweight aggregate kilns currently emit a total of 10.1 Mg of mercury per year. Based on these estimates, hazardous waste-burning sources represent about 4 percent of total anthropogenic emissions of mercury in the U.S. ^PEPA estimates that mercury emissions from hazardous waste-burning sources will be reduced to 3.3Mg per year at the proposed floor levels and to 2.0Mg per year at the proposed beyond the floor standard. These reductions would result in reductions of total anthropogenic U.S. emissions of approximately 3 percent. EPA expects that reductions in emissions from other mercury-emitting sources, will help reduce mercury levels in fish over time and therefore, fish consuming populations.

Timetable:
Action Date FR Cite
NPRM Cement Kilns, LWAKs, Incinerators  04/19/1996  61 FR 17358   
Final MACT "Fasttrack"  02/00/1998    
Additional Information: SAN No. 3333. ^PRFA: N
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes  Government Levels Affected: State 
Small Entities Affected: Businesses 
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes 
Agency Contact:
Larry Denyer
Environmental Protection Agency
Solid Waste and Emergency Response
5304W,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone:703 308-8770
Fax:703 308-0522
Email: denyer.larry@epa.gov