View Rule
| View EO 12866 Meetings | Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML |
| EPA/SWER | RIN: 2050-AG16 | Publication ID: Fall 2009 |
| Title: Revisions to the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule | |
| Abstract: On December 5, 2008, EPA amended the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule to provide increased clarity with respect to specific regulatory requirements, to tailor requirements to particular industry sectors, and to streamline certain rule requirements. The Agency subsequently delayed the effective date of these amendments to January 14, 2010 to allow the Agency time to review the amendments to ensure that they properly reflect consideration of all relevant facts. EPA also requested public comment on the delay of the effective date and its duration, and on the December 2008 amendments. EPA is reviewing the record for the amendments and the additional comments to determine if any changes are warranted. | |
| Agency: Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) | Priority: Economically Significant |
| RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda | Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Stage |
| Major: Yes | Unfunded Mandates: No |
| CFR Citation: 40 CFR 112 | |
| Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321 | |
|
Legal Deadline:
None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Statement of Need: The final rule is necessary to clarify the regulatory obligations of SPCC facility owners and operators and to reduce the regulatory burden where appropriate. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Summary of the Legal Basis: 33 USC 1321 et seq. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Alternatives: EPA considered alternative options for various aspects of this final rule, following receipt of public comments. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anticipated Costs and Benefits: The principal effect of the final amendments would be lower compliance costs for owners and operators of certain types of facilities and equipment. Preliminary cost savings for this rulemaking effort is estimated to be between $92-100 million. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risks: In the absence of quantitative information on the change in risk related to the specific proposed amendments, EPA conducted a qualitative assessment, which suggests that the final amendments will not lead to a significant increase in oil discharge risk. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timetable:
|
| Additional Information: SAN No. 2634.2; EPA publication information: Notice Clarifying Certain Issues - http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2004_register&docid=fr25my04-49.pdf; Split from RIN 2050-AC62.; EPA Docket information: EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0584 | |
| Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No | Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal |
| Small Entities Affected: No | Federalism: No |
| Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes | |
| RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oilspill/spcc.htm | |
| RIN Data Printed in the FR: No | |
|
Agency Contact: Vanessa Principe Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 5104A, Washington, DC 20460 Phone:202 564-7913 Email: principe.vanessa@epa.gov |
|
An official website of the United States government




