View Rule
| View EO 12866 Meetings | Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML |
| EPA/OAR | RIN: 2060-AW71 | Publication ID: 2026 |
| Title: Rescission of The Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding and Motor Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards Under The Clean Air Act | |
|
Abstract:
This action finalizes the rescission of the 2009 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding. The Endangerment Finding is a prerequisite for regulating emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines. Absent this finding, the EPA lacks statutory authority under Clean Air Act section 202 to prescribe standards for GHG emissions. Therefore, this action also repeals GHG regulations for light-, medium-, and heavy-duty on-highway vehicles. |
|
| Agency: Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) | Priority: Economically Significant |
| RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda | Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Actions |
| Major: Yes | Unfunded Mandates: No |
| EO 14192 Designation: Deregulatory | |
| CFR Citation: 40 CFR 85 40 CFR 86 40 CFR 600 40 CFR 1036 40 CFR 1037 40 CFR 1039 | |
| Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 to 7671q. | |
|
Legal Deadline:
None |
|||||||||||||||
|
Statement of Need: This action will ensure the EPA is acting within the legal authority of the Clean Air Act. |
|||||||||||||||
|
Summary of the Legal Basis: Clean Air Act Section 202. |
|||||||||||||||
|
Alternatives: The EPA’s proposal included a primary basis for repeal of the 2009 Endangerment Finding based on the best reading of the Clean Air Act. EPA included several alternative basis for recission of the 2009 Endangerment Finding and repeal of the EPA motor vehicle GHG emission standards, including consideration of the scientific record, consideration of the requisite technology, the futility of controlling motor vehicle GHG emissions to address the identified risks, and the impact of more expensive new vehicles on fleet turnover and negative impacts consumers ability to purchase newer, cleaner, and safer vehicles. |
|||||||||||||||
|
Anticipated Costs and Benefits: The EPA final rule included four different potential scenarios for estimating the savings and costs of the proposal. Utilizing a 7 percent discount rate, the savings ranged from $850 to $870 billion, the costs ranged from $200 to $760 billion, and the net savings ranged from $89 billion to $680 billion. Utilizing a 3 percent discount rate, the savings ranged from $1,290 billion to $1,340 billion, the costs ranged from $420 billion to $1,470 billion, and the net savings ranged from -$180 billion to +$920 billion. |
|||||||||||||||
|
Risks: EPA will analyze risks. |
|||||||||||||||
Timetable:
|
| Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No | Government Levels Affected: Federal |
| Federalism: No | |
| Energy Effects: Statement of Energy Effects planned as required by Executive Order 13211. | Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes |
| RIN Data Printed in the FR: No | |
| Related RINs: Related to 2060-AV49, Related to 2060-AV50 | |
|
Agency Contact: Elizabeth Miller Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Phone:734 214-4703 Email: miller.elizabeth@epa.gov |
|
An official website of the United States government




