View Rule
| View EO 12866 Meetings | Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML |
| DOT/FMCSA | RIN: 2126-AA10 | Publication ID: Fall 2006 |
| Title: Medical Certification Requirements as Part of the Commercial Driver's License | |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would require those commercial drivers license (CDL) drivers who are required to obtain a Federal medical certification, to make the current status of that certification part of the commercial drivers licensing and renewal process, as required by section 215 of the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act. Incorporating the current medical certification status information into the State-administered Commercial Drivers License Information System (CDLIS) driver record would improve highway safety by requiring those drivers who are federally required to obtain a medical certificate to provide proof of that medical certification in order to obtain or retain a CDL. It would enable electronic verification of the current medical certification status as part of existing employer and enforcement programs. It is proposed to eliminate the requirement for this portion of CDL operators to carry their medical examiners certificate in addition to their CDL since an electronic record would verify that there is a valid medical certificate. | |
| Agency: Department of Transportation(DOT) | Priority: Other Significant |
| RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda | Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Stage |
| Major: No | Unfunded Mandates: No |
| CFR Citation: 49 CFR 383, 384, and 391 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations.) | |
| Legal Authority: sec 215, PL 106-159 113 Stat 1748, 1767 (1999) 49 USC 31305 note and 31502 | |
|
Legal Deadline:
None |
||||||||||||
|
Statement of Need: This rule is required by Public Law 106-159. Section 215 of the Act requires that medical certification information be made part of the CDL. When applying for (or renewing) a CDL, 49 CFR part 383 requires drivers to self-certify whether they are subject to part 391 (Qualifications of Drivers). If they operate in interstate commerce and are not excepted, then part 383 requires these drivers to self-certify whether they meet the physical qualification requirements of part 391. Part 383 does not currently require drivers to provide any proof regarding their physical qualification to operate a CMV in order to obtain or retain a CDL. This rulemaking would require interstate CDL drivers who are not excepted to begin providing to their State driver-licensing agency (SDLA) an original or copy (at the States discretion) of each medical examiners certificate they obtain. The SDLA would modify their implementation of CDLIS and record information on that drivers Commercial Driver License Information System (CDLIS) individual driver record maintained by the State. The new required information would include both the self-certification regarding applicability of part 391, and for interstate drivers who are not excepted, the current medical certification status information. This combination of information about the applicability of part 391 and medical certification status would determine whether a CDL could be issued, transferred, upgraded, renewed, or retained. |
||||||||||||
|
Summary of the Legal Basis: Section 215 of the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 (MCSIA) directed the Secretary of Transportation (Secretary) to initiate a rulemaking to provide for a Federal medical qualification certificate to be made a part of commercial drivers licenses. The physical qualifications requirements in 49 CFR part 391 are based on 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31502. The physical qualifications standards are at 49 CFR 391.11. Part 391 regulations are applicable only to drivers who operate CMVs, as defined in 49 U.S.C. 31132. Thus, FMCSA interprets section 215 of MCSIA applicable only to interstate CDL holders. The Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 directed the Secretary to establish licensing standards for drivers that operate CMVs, as defined in 49 U.S.C. 31301. Those operators of CMVs as defined in 49 U.S.C. 31301, who are engaged solely in intrastate commerce, must obtain a CDL but are not required by current Federal regulations to obtain a medical certificate as proof of their physical qualifications to operate commercial vehicles. [49 CFR 383.71(a)(1)]. The Secretary delegated these authorities to FMCSA. [49 CFR ยง 1.73]. |
||||||||||||
|
Alternatives: All alternatives require SDLAs to modify CDLIS and record self-certification whether part 391 is applicable, i.e., whether or not driver operates in interstate commerce and is not excepted. If part 391 applicable, SDLA would record medical certification status. Under alternatives 1 and 2, SDLAs receive paper and perform data input. Under alternative 3, SDLAs would receive an electronic CDLIS transaction. Under all three alternatives, the CDLIS driver record maintained by SDLA would serve as official record of whether driver is authorized to operate in interstate commerce and thus is required to be currently medically certified. For drivers subject to part 391 and not excepted, employers would obtain medical certification status on the CDLIS motor vehicle record (MVR) from SDLA, as well as license status. Enforcement personnel would obtain current license status, whether driver operates in interstate commerce, and medical certification status via electronic checks. 1. CDL Renewal Cycle Same as Medical Certificate. Driver provides each medical examiner's certificate to SDLA, which issues new CDL expiring same day as certificate. CDLs issued more often, and drivers pay fees States assess. 2. No Change in CDL Renewal Cycle-Distributed. As in alternative 1, CDL drivers provide each medical examiner's certificate to SDLA. SDLAs develop capability to downgrade CDL if new certification not received by expiration. 3. No Change in CDL Renewal Cycle-Centralized. Certificates go to central location. Status information electronically transmitted to SDLA, which develops capability to electronically receive and record on CDLIS driver record. As in alternative 2, SDLA downgrades CDL if new certificate not received by expiration. |
||||||||||||
|
Anticipated Costs and Benefits: A preliminary regulatory evaluation for this rule was prepared and will be placed in the docket when the NPRM is published. |
||||||||||||
|
Risks: In addition to assessing costs, the agency is assessing the safety benefits. |
||||||||||||
Timetable:
|
| Additional Information: Docket No. FMCSA-97-2210. | |
| Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined | Government Levels Affected: State |
| Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions | Federalism: No |
| Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes | |
| RIN Information URL: dms.dot.gov | Public Comment URL: dms.dot.gov |
|
Agency Contact: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels Director, Office of Medical Programs Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Phone:202 366-4001 Email: maggi.gunnels@dot.gov |
|
An official website of the United States government



