View Rule
| View EO 12866 Meetings | Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML |
| FCC | RIN: 3060-AJ30 | Publication ID: Fall 2014 |
| Title: Preserving the Open Internet; Broadband Industry Practices | |
|
Abstract:
In 2009, the FCC launched a public process to determine whether and what actions might be necessary to preserve the characteristics that have allowed the Internet to grow into an indispensable platform supporting our Nation's economy and civic life. After receiving input from more than 100,000 individuals and organizations and several public workshops, this process has made clear that the Internet has thrived because of its freedom and openness--the absence of any gatekeeper blocking lawful uses of the network or picking winners and losers online. The Open Internet Order builds on the bipartisan Internet Policy Statement the Commission adopted in 2005. The Order requires that all broadband providers are required to be transparent by disclosing their network management practices, performance, and commercial terms; fixed providers may not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices; fixed providers may not unreasonably discriminate in transmitting lawful network traffic; mobile providers may not block access to lawful websites, or applications that compete with their voice or video telephony services; and all providers may engage in "reasonable network management," such as managing the network to address congestion or security issues. The rules do not prevent broadband providers from offering specialized services, such as facilities-based VoIP; do not prevent providers from blocking unlawful content or unlawful transfers of content; and do not supersede any obligation or authorization a provider may have to address the needs of emergency communications or law enforcement, public safety, or national security authorities. In January of 2014, the D.C. Circuit in Verizon v. FCC struck down the no-blocking and no-discrimination rules contained in the 2010 Open Internet Order, for the second time invalidating the Commission’s attempt to create legally enforceable standards to preserve the open internet. Consequently, the docket has been closed and a new one opened, WC Docket No. 14-28. |
|
| Agency: Federal Communications Commission(FCC) | Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant |
| RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda | Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-Term Actions |
| Major: No | Unfunded Mandates: No |
| CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations.) | |
| Legal Authority: 47 USC 151 47 USC 152 47 USC 154(i) to (j) 47 USC 201(b) | |
|
Legal Deadline:
None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timetable:
|
| Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes | Government Levels Affected: Undetermined |
| Small Entities Affected: Businesses | |
| Included in the Regulatory Plan: No | |
| International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of international interest. | |
| RIN Data Printed in the FR: Yes | |
| Related RINs: Related to 3060-AK21 | |
|
Agency Contact: R. Matthew Warner Attorney Advisor Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554 Phone:202 418-2419 Email: matthew.warner@fcc.gov |
|
An official website of the United States government




