View Rule
| View EO 12866 Meetings | Printer-Friendly Version Download RIN Data in XML |
| FCC | RIN: 3060-AL54 | Publication ID: Spring 2024 |
| Title: Order RE Minnesota Equal Access Corporation Petition for Forbearance; WC Docket No. 22-407 | |
|
Abstract:
Providers of centralized equal access (CEA) services are subject to a unique, overlapping regulatory regime, treated both as dominant rate-of-return carriers, subject to cost-based tariff filing requirements under Subpart E of Part 61 of the Commission’s common carrier rules, and as competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), subject to rate regulation under Subpart C. CEA providers were originally formed to implement long distance equal access obligations (permitting end users to use 1+ dialing to reach the interexchange carrier (IXC) of their choice) and aggregate traffic for connection between rural incumbent LEC and IXC networks. In 1990, the Commission granted the Minnesota Equal Independent Access Corporation (MIEAC) authority under Section 214 of the Communications Act to provide CEA service to IXCs through a centralized switching facility in the State of Minnesota. On November 21, 2022, MIEAC, one of several providers to which the Commission granted authority to provide CEA services, filed a Petition seeking forbearance from dominant carrier regulation with respect to its CEA service, including tariffing requirements, pricing regulation, and certain procedural requirements that follow from MIEAC’s status as a dominant carrier. These requirements include cost-based tariff filing requirements (such as the biennial requirement to perform cost studies and rate of return calculations), and requirements related to discontinuance of services and transfers of control. Currently, MIEAC’s tariffed switched transport rate cannot exceed: (i) the applicable rate cap; (ii) the CLEC benchmark rate; or (iii) the applicable cost-based rate; among these, the operative constraint on MIEAC’s interstate switched access rates is the CLEC benchmark, and MIEAC’s current rates fall beneath that benchmark. On December 1, 2022, the Bureau issued a Public Notice seeking comment on the Petition for Reconsideration, and the comment and reply comment periods closed without any filings for or against the Petitioner. |
|
| Agency: Federal Communications Commission(FCC) | Priority: Other Significant |
| RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda | Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-Term Actions |
| Major: No | Unfunded Mandates: No |
| CFR Citation: 47 CFR 1.49 to 1.59 | |
| Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 160 | |
Legal Deadline:
|
||||||||||||
|
Overall Description of Deadline: The Commission must act upon Petitions for Forbearance within one year of their filling date, unless the Commission finds it necessary to extend the deadline by an additional 90 days, as permitted by the statute. This Petition was filed on Nov. 22, 2022, and the deadline is therefore Nov. 22, 2023. |
||||||||||||
Timetable:
|
| Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No | Government Levels Affected: None |
| Federalism: No | |
| Included in the Regulatory Plan: No | |
| RIN Data Printed in the FR: No | |
|
Agency Contact: Erik Raven-Hansen Assistant Division Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Comp. Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554 Phone:202 418-1532 Email: erik.raven-hansen@fcc.gov |
|
An official website of the United States government



