View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View Generic ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
1850-0803
ICR Reference No:
201003-1850-001
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
200812-1850-002
Agency/Subagency:
ED/IES
Agency Tracking No:
3738
Title:
System Clearance for Cognitive, Pilot and Field Test Studies
Type of Information Collection:
No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
03/10/2010
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
03/08/2010
Terms of Clearance:
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
09/30/2010
09/30/2010
09/30/2010
Responses
45,000
0
3,540
Time Burden (Hours)
9,000
0
4,442
Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
Abstract:
This is a request for a generic clearance for the National Center for Education Statistics to conduct various procedures to test questionnaires and survey procedures. These procedures include but are not limited to experiments with levels of incentives for various types of survey operations, focus groups, cognitive laboratory activities, pilot testing, experiments with questionnaire design, and usability testing of electronic data collection instruments.
Authorizing Statute(s):
PL:
Pub.L. 107 - 279 151
Name of Law: Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, Part C
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
72 FR 33211
06/15/2007
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
72 FR 45799
08/15/2007
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
20
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
Cognitive Interviews for Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 Third Follow-up 2012 (ELS:2002/12) Survey Draft Items
Cognitive Interviews for New Items to Measure Educational Certificates or Similar Training among Adults in the United States
N/A, N/A, N/A
Cognitive Interview Screener
,
Cognitive Interview Certificate Protocol
,
Cognitive Interview Flow Chart
Cognitive Interviews for New Items to Measure Industry-Recognized Certifications or Similar Training among Adults in the U.S.
Cognitive Interviews for New Items to Measure Professional Certifications and Educational Certificates among Adults in the United States
Cognitive Interviews for the 2010 National Household Education Survey (NHES) Study Draft Questionnaires
Cognitive, Pilot and Field Test Studies -- National Household Education Survey (NHES) 2009 Study Respondent Debrief Interviews
FRSS 98: Fast Response Survey of Distance Education in K-12 (Pretest)
FRSS 99: District Fast Response Survey of Dropout Prevention - Pretest
Focus Groups for New Items to Measure Certificates and Industry-Recognized Certifications among Adults in the United States
NAEP 2011 Technology Writing Assessment Usability Study
NAEP 2011 Writing Assessment Audiovisual Stimuli Cognitive Interviews
NAEP Grade 8 Mathematics Block Difficulty Pilot Study
N/A
NAEP Math Block Difficulty Pilot Study
NAEP Study of First-Year Texas Postsecondary Students 2010 Pilot Test
NPSAS:12 Cognitive Testing Recruitment 2010
National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) 2010 - Puerto Rico Cognitive Interview Study - Mathematics Items
National Household Education Survey (NHES) 2009 Study - Cognitive Interviews
National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS) Focus Groups
Principal Survey
Review of 2007 NAEP Mathematics Items
The Adult Training and Education Survey (ATES) 2010 Pilot Test and the Spanish Cognitive Interviews for the 2010 National Household Education Survey (NHES) Study Draft Questionnaires
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
45,000
3,540
0
41,460
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
9,000
4,442
0
4,558
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Increase Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Reduction Due to:
Short Statement:
This change request is to increase the number of responses and burden hours allowed under the generic clearance for the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) to conduct various tests of questionnaires and survey procedures, especially to test new questions, forms, or other methodologies. These procedures include but are not limited to experiments with levels of incentives for various types of survey operations, focus groups, cognitive laboratory activities, pilot testing, experiments with questionnaire design, and usability testing of electronic data collection instruments. There are two primary reasons for the request to increase burden: (1) inclusion of screeners and other recruitment activities that were not before included in burden calculations (this increases the estimated number of respondents approximately 12 times and the estimated burden hours approximately 2 times per study), and (2) anticipated increase in the number of cognitive studies being submitted to OMB for clearance as a result of recent OMB guidance pertaining to testing new items and methodologies.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$0
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
Yes
Part B of Supporting Statement
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
Uncollected
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
David Malouf 202 219-1309
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
03/08/2010