View Information Collection Request (ICR) Package
Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Search:
Agenda
Reg Review
ICR
This script is used to control the display of information in this page.
Display additional information by clicking on the following:
All
Brief and OIRA conclusion
Abstract/Justification
Legal Statutes
Rulemaking
FR Notices/Comments
IC List
Burden
Misc.
Common Form Info.
Certification
View Information Collection (IC) List
View Supporting Statement and Other Documents
Please note that the OMB number and expiration date may not have been determined when this Information Collection Request and associated Information Collection forms were submitted to OMB. The approved OMB number and expiration date may be found by clicking on the Notice of Action link below.
View Generic ICR - OIRA Conclusion
OMB Control No:
1090-0011
ICR Reference No:
201503-1090-001
Status:
Historical Active
Previous ICR Reference No:
201203-1090-001
Agency/Subagency:
DOI/ASPMB
Agency Tracking No:
Title:
DOI Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved collection
Common Form ICR:
No
Type of Review Request:
Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action:
Approved without change
Conclusion Date:
08/04/2015
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA)
Date Received in OIRA:
06/29/2015
Terms of Clearance:
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
Expiration Date
08/31/2018
36 Months From Approved
08/31/2015
Responses
52,500
0
483,000
Time Burden (Hours)
11,850
0
87,000
Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
Abstract:
In order to work continuously to ensure that our programs are effective and meet our customers' needs, the Department of the Interior seeks to obtain OMB approval of a generic clearance to collect qualitative feedback on our service delivery. By qualitative feedback we mean information that provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be generalized to the population of study.
Authorizing Statute(s):
EO: EO 12862 Name/Subject of EO: Setting Customer Service Standards
EO: EO 13571 Name/Subject of EO: Streamlining Service Delivery and Improving Customer Service
Citations for New Statutory Requirements:
None
Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:
Stage of Rulemaking:
Federal Register Citation:
Date:
Not associated with rulemaking
Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
80 FR 14158
03/18/2015
30-day Notice:
Federal Register Citation:
Citation Date:
80 FR 37010
06/29/2015
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR?
No
Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR:
92
IC Title
Form No.
Form Name
ACRCC Partner Assessment of asiancarp.us
Acquisition 360 Survey-2nd Iteration
American Ginseng Biology Working Group - Questionnaire
American Ginseng Outreach Questionnaire and Materials Inventory
Arid Lands Initiative Community Forum Questionnaire
Art For The Parks Program Evaluation
Artificial Night Lighting – request for published literature or proven best practices for minimizing environmental Impacts associated with artificial night lighting.
Assessment of Store Owners/Managers Interest and Awareness Regarding Aquatic Invasive Species in Alaska
Assessment of USGS Science for Next-Generation Infrastructure Needs
BIA Dataset Survey
BIA TCRP Program
BLM Information Access Center (IAC) Customer Comment Card
BSEE Domestic and International Standards Workshop Survey
Bureau of Land Management - Wild Horse and Burro Program Customer Comment Card
Data Rescue and Preservation Workshop – Post Survey
Double-crested Cormorant Information Sharing Interviews
Eastern Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge Complex Hunter Survey
Ecosystems Program Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey
Emperor Goose Spring Subsistence Harvest Survey
Evaluation of Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution (ECCR) Services and Training by the DOI Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR)
Evaluation of Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution (ECCR) Services and Training by the DOI Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR)
Evaluation of Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution (ECCR) Services and Training by the DOI Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR)
Evaluation of Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution (ECCR) Services and Training by the DOI Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR)
Evaluation of Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution (ECCR) Services and Training by the DOI Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR)
Evaluation of Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution (ECCR) Services and Training by the DOI Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR)
Evaluation of Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution (ECCR) Services and Training by the DOI Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR)
Evaluation of Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution (ECCR) Services and Training by the DOI Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR)
Evaluation of Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution (ECCR) Services and Training by the DOI Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR)
Evaluation of Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution (ECCR) Services and Training by the DOI Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution (CADR)
Evaluation of NCCSC and SCCSC Co-Produced Science
FWS.Gov Redesign: Discovery & Requirements Gathering
FWS.Gov Website Redesign: Navigation Model Testing
Falconry Database Usability Testing
Feedback Survey for BOEM 2017-2022 Oil and Gas Leasing Program Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Meetings
Feedback from USGS Email Customers
Feedback from USGS Phone Customers
Focus groups as part of the initiative to Understand and Connect Americans and Nature
Focus groups to evaluate landowner preferences for Farm Bill Conservation Program service
Formative Evaluation of Exhibits for Kenai Fjords National Park Visitor Center
Formative Evaluation of Interpretive Design and Restoration for the Carter G. Woodson Home using Focus Groups
Formative Evaluation of Interpretive Design and Restoration for the Carter G. Woodson Home using On-site Surveys
Formative evaluation of exhibits for Governors Island National Monument/Fort Jay
Formative evaluation of proposed exhibits at the Valley Forge National Historical Park Visitor Center
Fuel Geyser Incident Reporting Form
Hands-on Salvage Training Program Survey
Hawksbill Sea Turtle Demand Reduction Campaign in the Dominican Republic (as part of JetBlue – USFWS Partnership)
Information Submission Website: Double-crested Cormorant and Free-Swimming Fish Data, Reports, and Comments
John Heinz National Wildlife Refuge – Transportation Feedback Form
Land Buy-Back Program Landowner Participation Survey
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives Performance Evaluation
Listening Sessions with FWS Partners for updating Migratory Bird Program's Strategic Plan
NHDPlus High Resolution QC Interest Form
NPS Pre-award phase satisfaction survey
National Cache Medial Supply Kit Assessment
National Park Service Internship Program Qualitative Assessment
National Park Service Office of Heritage Partnerships Program Customer Satisfaction Survey
National Science Foundation Ice Core Facility Tour Survey Form
Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge - Environmental Education Feedback Form
Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge - Public Program Feedback Form
Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge - Visitor Center Feedback Form
New England Water Science Center Network Prioritization
Non-Federal Landsat User Requirements
North Central Climate Science Center Quality of Service Survey
OST Beneficiary Satisfaction Survey
Office of Public Health Online Customer Satisfaction Survey
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Program (PNAMP)
Partner Assessments for the Urban Wildlife Conservation Program and Urban Bird treaty Cities
Piping Plover Shorebird Communications Needs Survey
Pre- and Post-Assessment of Alaska's Urban Youth and their Experiences with Fishing
Pre- and Post-Assessment of Youth's Experiences in SoCal Urban Wildlife Refuge Project Programs
Rescue and Preservation of GeoscientificData and Materials Workshop
Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) Survey
Suggestions for Climate Change Response Program Toolkit
None
None
Survey of business travelers between US and China as part of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service demand reduction efforts.
Telephone Survey of Black Vulture – Livestock Interaction Meeting Participants
Telephone Survey of Black Vulture – Livestock South Carolina Roundtable Participants
The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Control's Technical Training Program Course Effectiveness Evaluations
N/A, N/A
Participant Survey
,
Supervisor Survey
Tribal Energy Development Capacity (TEDC) Grant Program Survey
USGS Landsat Elicitation
USGS Science Application for Risk Reduction Workshop Feedback
USGS-- Feedback from Web Chat Customers
Usability Study Focus Group – Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Web-tools
Usability Study Survey – Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Web-tools
Usability Testing of Online Migratory Bird Harvest Survey Trial Deployment
Web comment form for soliciting feedback on the Firefighter Type 2 (FFT2) Incident Position Description (IPD).
Web comment form for soliciting feedback on the Incident Commander Type 4 (ICT4) Incident Position Description (IPD).
Web comment form for soliciting feedback on the Seat Manager (SEMG) Incident Position Description (IPD).
Web comment form for soliciting feedback on the Single Engine Air Tanker Manager (SEMG) Incident Position Description (IPD).
Web comment form for soliciting feedback on wildland fire position information.
Web-Based Survey with FWS Partners for Updating Migratory Bird Program's Strategic Plan
Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Programs Communications Phone Interview
Workshop Survey – "BSEE International Standards Workshop"
ICR Summary of Burden
Total Approved
Previously Approved
Change Due to New Statute
Change Due to Agency Discretion
Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate
Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses
52,500
483,000
0
-430,500
0
0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)
11,850
87,000
0
-75,150
0
0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
No
Burden Increase Due to:
Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion:
Yes
Burden Reduction Due to:
Miscellaneous Actions
Short Statement:
The reduction in the estimated number of responses and time burden is based on the agency's activity under this approval over the past three years and its projected activity over the next three years.
Annual Cost to Federal Government:
$123,536
Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?
Yes
Part B of Supporting Statement
Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002?
No
Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]?
No
Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]?
No
Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)?
No
Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response?
Uncollected
Agency Contact:
Don Bieniewicz 202 208-4915 Donald_Bieniewicz@ios.doi.gov
Common Form ICR:
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;
(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;
(c) It reduces burden on small entities;
(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;
(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;
(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;
(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.
(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and
(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
Certification Date:
06/29/2015